Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study

References

• Pinter B. Medico-legal aspects of abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002;7:15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network. Abortion Legislation in Europe 2012. Available from: http://www.ippfen.org/sites/default/files/Final_Abortionlegislation_September2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berer M. A critical appraisal of laws on second trimester abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16:3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr PA. Surgical abortion in the second trimester. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16:151–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M. Conscientious objection and the Council of Europe: the right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care. Med Law Rev. 2011;19:467–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ, Dickens BM. The growing abuse of conscientious objection. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8:337–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights. Opinion No. 4-2005 The Right to Conscientious Objection and the Conclusion by EU Member States of Concordats With the Holy See 2005. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/cfr_cdfopinion4_2005_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Habiba M, Da Fre M, Taylor DJ, et al. Late termination of pregnancy: a comparison of obstetricians' experience in eight European countries. BJOG. 2009;116:1340–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo SMJ. Physicians and abortion: provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground – the cases of Brazil and Poland. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21:S32–S36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo S. Interruption volontaire de grossesse et clause de conscience en Italie et en Espagne, entre droits des femmes et « droits » du fœtus/patient [Abortion and the conscience clause in Italy and Spain: between women's rights and “rights” of the fetus/patient]. Rev Soc Santé. 2015;38:107–130. French.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo S. A fragmented landscape: abortion governance and associated protest logics in Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, et al. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdts C, DePiñeres T, Hajri S, et al. Denial of abortion in legal settings. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;41:161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006;368:1908–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Department of Health. Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2014 [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Jun 9]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bo M, Zotti CM, Charrier L. Conscientious objection and waiting time for voluntary abortion in Italy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20:272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerva F. Conscientious objection in Italy. J Med Ethics. 2015;41:170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republica Italiana Ministero della Salute. Relazione del Ministero della Salute sull’attuazione della legge contenente norme per la tutela della tutela sociale della maternità e per l’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza 2015 [Ministry of Health Report on the implementation of the law containing provisions for the defense of the social protection of maternity and voluntary interruption of pregnancy]. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2428_allegato.pdf. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo S. Good doctors do not object: obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on conscientious objection to abortion care and their engagement with pro-abortion rights protests in Italy. In: De Zordo S, Mishtal J, Anton L, editors. A fragmented landscape: abortion governance and associated protest logics in Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sethna C, Doull M. Accidental tourists: Canadian women, abortion tourism, and travel. Womens Stud. 2012;41:457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethna C, Palmer B, Ackerman K, et al. Choice, interrupted: travel and inequality of access to abortion services since the 1960s. Labour-Travail. 2013;71:29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Jerman J. How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22:706–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman D, Garcia SG, Kingston J, et al. Mexican women seeking safe abortion services in San Diego, California. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33:1060–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickson C, Shelley J, Smith A. Use of interstate services for the termination of pregnancy in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002;26:421–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francome C. Irish women who seek abortions in England. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:265–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best A. Abortion rights along the Irish-English border and the liminality of women’s experiences. Dialect Anthropol. 2005;29:423–437.
   Google Scholar
• Irish Family Planning Association. The Irish journey: women’s stories of abortion. Dublin: Irish Family Planning Association; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter A. Ireland's hidden diaspora: the ‘abortion trail’ and the making of a London-Irish underground, 1980–2000. London: IASC; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ingham R, Lee E, Clements SJ, et al. Reasons for second trimester abortions in England and Wales. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, et al. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception. 2006;74:334–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, et al. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo MF, Nghia NC. Real life is different: a qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester in Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1812–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom of Bahrain Central Informatics Organisation. Bahrain Open Data Portal. Available from: http://www.data.gov.bh/en/ResourceCenter.
   Google Scholar
• Sultanate of Oman. National Centre for Statistics and Information 2015. Available from: https://www.ncsi.gov.om/Pages/NCSI.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Hessini L. Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15:75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishtal J. Reproductive governance in the new Europe: competing visions of morality, sovereignty, and supranational policy. Anthropol J Eur Cult. 2014;23:59–76.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare 2011. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011L0024&from=EN.
   Google Scholar