Advanced search
Publication Cover
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Volume 22, 2017 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
527
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
New Developments

Development and conceptual validation of a questionnaire to help contraceptive choice: CHLOE (Contraception: HeLping for wOmen’s choicE)

Christian Georges Jamina 169, Boulevard Haussmann, Paris, France; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Gunther Häuslerb Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-0243View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Paloma Lobo Abascalc Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Infanta Sofía University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; View further author information
,
Christian Fialad Gynmed Ambulatorium, Vienna, Austria; ;e Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6451-7349View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Luis Ignacio Lete Lasaf Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; View further author information
,
Rossella Elena Nappig Research Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Gynaecological Endocrinology and Menopause, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5216-9882View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Marie-Christine Michelettih Teva Europe Women’s Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; View further author information
,
Ana Fernández-Doradoi Adelphi, Barcelona, Spain; View further author information
,
Axelle Pintiauxj Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; View further author information
&
Natalie Chabbert-Buffetk Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, APHP Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, FranceORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-4154View further author information
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 286-290 | Received 07 Jun 2017, Accepted 03 Aug 2017, Published online: 07 Sep 2017

References

  • Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:301–314.
  • Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell K, Nelson AL, et al., editors. Contraceptive technology. 20th rev ed. New York (NY): Ardent Media; 2011.
  • Dehlendorf C, Kimport K, Levy K, et al. A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:233–240.
  • World Health Organization. Chapter 3: Not every pregnancy is welcome. In: The world health report 2005 – make every mother and child count. Available from: www.who.int/whr/2005/chapter3/en/index3.html (accessed March 2017).
  • Wyatt KD, Anderson RT, Creedon D, et al. Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids. BMC Women’s Health. 2014;14:28.
  • Lauring JR, Lehman EB, Deimling TA, et al. Combined hormonal contraception use in reproductive-age women with contraindications to estrogen use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:330.e1–337.
  • Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, et al. Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception. 2013;88:250–256.
  • Guendelman S, Denny C, Mauldon J, et al. Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:233–239.
  • Oppelt PG, Denny C, Mauldon J, et al. Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1483–1491.
  • Bitzer J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Roumen F, et al. The CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012;17:65–78.
  • Elmore N, Burt J, Abel G, et al. Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:e896–e903.
  • Lemon TI, Smith RH. Consultation content not consultation length improves patient satisfaction. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2014;3:333–339.
  • Wilson A, Childs S. The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:1012–1020.
  • Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003267.
  • French RS, Wellings K, Cowan FM. How can we help people to choose a method of contraception? The case for contraceptive decision aids. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009;35:219–220.
  • Carvajal DN, Gioia D, Mudafort ER, et al. How can primary care physicians best support contraceptive decision making? A qualitative study exploring the perspectives of Baltimore Latinas. Women’s Health Issues. 2017;27:158–166.
  • RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, et al. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29:76–83.
  • Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:89–92.
  • Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1359–1369.
  • Glasier A, Scorer J, Bigrigg A. Attitudes of women in Scotland to contraception: a qualitative study to explore the acceptability of long-acting methods. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008;34:213–217.
  • Forrest JD. U.S. women’s perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51:S30–S34.
  • French RS, Cowan FM, Wellings K, et al. The development of a multi-criteria decision analysis aid to help with contraceptive choices: my contraception tool. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;40:96–101.
  • Egarter C, Frey Tirri B, Bitzer J, et al. Women’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling. BMC Women’s Health. 2013;13:9.
  • Madden T, Secura GM, Nease RF, et al. The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:46.e1–e6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.