597
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Long-term risk of hysterectomy and ectopic pregnancy among Vietnamese women using the quinacrine hydrochloride pellet system vs. intrauterine devices or tubal ligation for contraception

, , , &
Pages 105-115 | Received 17 Sep 2017, Accepted 03 Mar 2018, Published online: 23 Apr 2018

References

  • Institute for Development Training. Female voluntary non-surgical sterilization: the quinacrine method. Module 12 of Training Course in Women’s Health. Chapel Hill (NC): IDT; 1996.
  • Growe RG, Luster MI, Fall PA, et al. Quinacrine-induced occlusive fibrosis in the human fallopian tube is due to a unique inflammatory response and modification of repair mechanisms. J Reprod Immunol. 2013;97:159–166.
  • Oanh TTM, Tien TV, Luong DH, et al. Assessing provincial health systems in Vietnam: lessons from two provinces. Bethesda (MD): Abt Associates Inc.; 2009.
  • Cancel AM, Dillberger JE, Kelly CM, et al. A lifetime cancer bioassay of quinacrine administered into the uterine horns of female rats. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;56:156–165.
  • Haseman JK, Growe RG, Zeiger E, et al. A critical examination of the mode of action of quinacrine in the reproductive tract in a 2-year rat cancer bioassay and its implications for human clinical use. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;71:371–378.
  • Jones JK, Tave A, Pezzullo JC, et al. Long-term risk of reproductive cancer among Vietnamese women using the quinacrine hydrochloride pellet system vs. intrauterine devices or tubal ligation for contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22:123–130.
  • Hieu DT, Tan TT, Tan DN, et al. 31,781 cases of non-surgical female sterilisation with quinacrine pellets in Vietnam. Lancet. 1993;342:213–217.
  • Sokal DC, Hieu DT, Weiner DH, et al. Long-term follow-up after quinacrine sterilization in Vietnam. Part II: interim safety analysis. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1092–1101.
  • Hieu DT, Luong TT. The rate of ectopic pregnancy for 24,589 quinacrine sterilization (QS) users compared to users of other methods and no method in 4 provinces in Vietnam, 1994–1996. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(2):S35–S43.
  • Sokal DC, Hieu DT, Loan ND, et al. Safety of quinacrine contraceptive pellets: results from 10-year follow-up in Vietnam. Contraception. 2008;78:66–72.
  • Feldblum PJ, Wheeless A, Trujillo V, et al. Pelvic surgery and hospitalization among Chilean women after nonsurgical sterilization with quinacrine pellets between 1977 and 1989. Contraception. 2012; 86:106–109.
  • Anh DN, Tacoli C, Thanh HX, Migration in Vietnam, A review of information on current trends and patterns, and their policy implications. Paper presented at: Regional Conference on Migration, Development and Pro-Poor Policy Choices in Asia. 2003 June 22–24; Dhaka, Bangladesh. [cited 2017 July 26]; Available from: http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0903/Dhaka_CP_7.pdf
  • Westman J, Hampel H, Bradley T. Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment. J Med Genet. 2000;37:354–360.
  • Peipert JF, Gutmann J. Oral contraceptive risk assessment: a survey of 247 educated women. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:112–117.
  • Michels KB, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Manson JE, et al. Prospective assessment of breastfeeding and breast cancer incidence among 89,887 women. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51:468–469.
  • Shlay JC, Dunn T, Byers T, et al. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2–3 using risk assessment and human papillomavirus testing in women with atypia on papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56:87–88.
  • Kindermann G, Maassen V, Kuhn W. Laparoscopic management of ovarian tumors subsequently diagnosed as malignant: a survey from 127 German departments of obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53:212–213.
  • Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S. Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:239–245.
  • Hughes KS, Roche C, Campbell CT, et al. Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire. Breast J. 2003;9:19–25.
  • McWilliams RR, Rabe KG, Olswold C, et al. Risk of malignancy in first-degree relatives of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104:388–394.
  • Hall IJ, Burke W, Coughlin S, et al. Population-based estimates of the prevalence of family history of cancer among women. Community Genet. 2001;4:134–142.
  • Euhus DM, Leitch AM, Huth JF, et al. Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic. Breast J. 2002;8:23–27.
  • Lee JS, John EM, McGuire V, et al. Breast and ovarian cancer in relatives of cancer patients, with and without BRCA mutations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:359–363.
  • Rauscher GH, Sandler DP, Poole C, et al. Family history of cancer and incidence of acute leukemia in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:517–526.
  • Walter FM, Emery J. ‘Coming down the line’ – patients’ understanding of their family history of common chronic disease. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:405–414.
  • Lamon JM. Cancer surveillance. Who stands to benefit? Postgrad Med. 1985;78:55–8, 63–70.
  • Spangler E, Zeigler-Johnson CM, Malkowicz SB, et al. Association of prostate cancer family history with histopathological and clinical characteristics of prostate tumors. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:471–474.
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.
  • D’Agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281.
  • Aziz S. Indication of emergency hysterectomy in Pakistani patients. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pakistan. 2017;7:45–49.
  • Heinonen PK, Helin R, Nieminen K. Long-term impact and risk factors for hysterectomy after hysteroscopic surgery for menorrhagia. Gynecol Surg. 2006;3:265–269.
  • Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86:36–43.
  • Li C, Zhao WH, Meng CX, et al. Contraceptive use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115031.
  • Tahmina S, Daniel M, Solomon P. Clinical analysis of ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary care centre in southern India: a six-year retrospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:QC13–QC16.
  • Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46:521–527.
  • Templeton AA, Cole S. Hysterectomy following sterilization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;89:845–848.
  • Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, et al. Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. collaborative review of sterilization. The U.S. collaborative review of sterilization working group. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:241–246.
  • Hieu DT, Van HT, Donaldson PJ, et al. The pattern of IUD use in Vietnam. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1995;21:6–10.