Are there unmet needs in contraceptive counselling and choice? Findings of the European TANCO Study

References

• Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:659–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Kimport K, Levy K, et al. A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt KD, Anderson RT, Creedon D, et al. Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids. BMC Women’s Health. 2014;14:28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients’ and providers’ information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception. 2014;90:280–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:115.e1–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1105–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Henry N, Hassan F, et al. Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2013;87:154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monea E, Thomas A. Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43:88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgisson NE, Zhao Q, Secura GM, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24:349–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee Opinion no 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1424–1428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (Part 3 of 4): chapter 7 – intrauterine contraception. JOGC. 2016;38:182–222.
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Intrauterine Contraception. FSRH, [2007, updated 2015 Oct; cited 2017 Nov 23]. Available at: www.fsrh.org/pdfs/CEUGuidanceIntrauterineContraception.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Black KI, Lotke P, Lira J, et al. Global survey of healthcare practitioners’ beliefs and practices around intrauterine contraceptive method use in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2013;88:650–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstuck ND. Reducing barriers to the use of intrauterine contraceptive device as a long acting reversible contraceptive. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;4:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ihongbe TO, Mashow SW. Changes in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. nulliparous women: results from the 2006–2010, 2011–2013, and 2013–2015 National Survey of Family Growth. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017;27:245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppelt PG, Baier F, Fahlbusch C, et al. What do patients want to know about contraception and which method would they prefer?. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1483–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiedel J, Harper CC, Shiedls WC. Editorial. The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2008;78:197–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour D. International survey to assess women’s attitudes regarding choice of daily versus nondaily female hormonal contraception. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:367–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Combined hormonal contraception and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepert J, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1291–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011;83:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata LB, Steenlands MW, Brahmi D, et al. Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87:685–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egarter C, Frey Tirri B, Bitzer J, et al. Women’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling. BMC Women’s Health. 2013;13:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merki-Feld GS, Gruber IML. Broad counseling for adolescents about combined hormonal contraceptive methods: The CHOICE study. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54:404–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemzell-Danielsson K, Cho S, Inki P, et al. Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling – results of an international survey in 10 countries. Contraception. 2012;86:631–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Pion C, Jennings V. Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America. Reprod Health. 2013;10:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarewski A, von Stenglin A, Rybowski S. Women's attitudes towards monthly bleeding: results of a global population-based survey. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2012;17:270–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merki-Feld GS, Breitschmid N, Seifert B, et al. A survey on Swiss women's preferred menstrual/withdrawal bleeding pattern over different phases of reproductive life and with use of hormonal contraception. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2014;19:266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhammer DL, Fraser C, Wigginton B, et al. What do young Australian women want (when talking to doctors about contraception)? BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhling KJ, Klovekorn L, Daniels B, et al. Contraceptive counselling and self-prescription of contraceptives of German gynaecologists: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2014;19:448–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation. Barometer of women’s access to modern contraceptive choice in 10 European Countries [June 2013; cited 2017 Nov 23]. Available from: http://www.ippfen.org/resource/barometer-womens-access-modern-contraceptive-choice-16-eu-countries-call-action.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs JN, Creinin MD. Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies. Contraception. 2003;68:373–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos MK, Bartholomew NE, Lohr KN. Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda. Contraception. 2003;67:115–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar