328
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Clinical experience with a novel anchored, frameless copper-releasing contraceptive device for intra-caesarean insertion

, , &
Pages 255-259 | Received 02 Mar 2018, Accepted 16 Jun 2018, Published online: 01 Oct 2018

References

  • McDonald EA, Brown SJ. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? Bjog. 2013;120:823–830.
  • Goldthwaite LM, Sheeder J, Hyer J. Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:674.e1–674.e8.
  • Çelen S, Sucak A, Yildiz Y, et al. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section. Contraception. 2011;84:240–243.
  • Ragab A, Hamed HO, Alsammani MA, et al. Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130:174–178.
  • Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, et al. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1014–1020.
  • Swati G, Shashiprateek M, Renuka S, et al. Association of the position of the Copper T 380A as determined by the ultrasonography following its insertion in the immediate postpartum period with the subsequent complications: an observational study. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64:349–353.
  • Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1003–1006.
  • Wildemeersch D, Goldstuck ND, Hasskamp T. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion. Dev Period Med. 2016;20:7–15.
  • Zhang H, Fang G, Zhou C. Study on GyneFix PP IUD insertion during caesarean section. Chin J Fam Plann. 2004;12:481–482.
  • Unal C, Eser A, Tozkir E, Wildemeersch D. Comparison of expulsions following intracesarean placement of an innovative frameless copper-releasing IUD (Gyn-CS®) versus the TCu380A: A randomized trial. Contraception. 2018;98:135–140.
  • Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, et al. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:131–137.
  • Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, et al. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1079–1087.
  • Glazer AB1, Wolf A, Gorby N. Postpartum contraception: needs vs. reality. Contraception. 2011;83:238–241.
  • Mattinson A, Mansour D. Female sterilization: is it what women really want? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003;29:136–139.
  • Wildemeersch D, Pett A, Jandi S. The anchor of the frameless intrauterine device does not migrate over time: an analysis in over 300 women. J Contracept. 2014;5:91–96.
  • Cao X, Zhang W, Gao G, et al. Randomized comparative trial in parous women of the frameless GyneFix and the TCu380A intrauterine devices: long-term experience in a Chinese family planning clinic. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000;5:135–140.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.