Short- and long-term effect of contraceptive methods on fecundity

References

• Wise LA, Mikkelsen EM, Rothman KJ. A prospective cohort study of menstrual characteristics and time to pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:701–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, et al. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:577–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen EM, Riis AH, Wise LA, et al. Pre-gravid oral contraceptive use and time to pregnancy: a Danish prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1398–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, et al. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1959–1966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, et al. An internet-based prospective study of body size and time-to-pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:253–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapra KJ, McLain AC, Maisog JM, et al. Clustering of retrospectively reported and prospectively observed time-to-pregnancy. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25:959–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselink AK, Wise LA, Hatch EE, et al. Menstrual cycle characteristics and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26:482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe M, Key J, Best N, et al. Studying time to pregnancy by use of a retrospective design. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin RG, Rothman KJ, Hatch EE, et al. Maternal recall error in retrospectively-reported time-to-pregnancy: an assessment and bias analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29:576–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde JP, Joffe M, Sallm??n M, et al. Validity issues relating to time-to-pregnancy studies of fertility. Epidemiology. 2006;17:347–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sozou PD, Hartshorne GM. Time to pregnancy: a computational method for using the duration of non-conception for predicting conception. PLOS One. 2012;7:e46544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry L. Some data on natural fertility. Eugen Q. 1961;8:81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Wilson C. Sterility in a population with natural fertility. Popul. Stud. 1985;39:269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Dunson D, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2001;17:1399–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Body mass index and ovulatory infertility. Epidemiology. 1994;5:247–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, et al. Physical activity, body mass index and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology. 2002;13:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise LA, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Body size and time-to-pregnancy in black women. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2856–2864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesink Law DC, Maclehose RF, Longnecker MP. Obesity and time to pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen TK, Scheike T, Keiding N, et al. Fecundability in relation to body mass and menstrual cycle patterns. Epidemiology. 1999;10:422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin T, Bergh T, Berglund L, et al. Menstrual cycle length is an age-independent marker of female fertility: results from 6271 treatment cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1656–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis KM, Savitz DA, Arbuckle TE. Effects of cigarette smoking, caffeine consumption, and alcohol intake on fecundability. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen EM, Riis AH, Wise LA, et al. Alcohol consumption and fecundability: prospective Danish cohort study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axmon A, Rylander L, Albin M, et al. Factors affecting time to pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1279–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MA, Killick SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:384–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan B, Nahum R, Yairi Y, et al. Use of various contraceptive methods and time of conception in a community-based population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:72–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn S, Schoenbaum SC, Monson RR, et al. Delay in conception for former 'pill' users. JAMA. 1982;247:629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessey MP, Wright NH, McPherson K, et al. Fertility after stopping different methods of contraception. Br Med J. 1978;1:265–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart KT, Schreiber CA. Return to fertility following discontinuation of oral contraceptives. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Gemzell Danielsson K, Inki P, et al. Fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a comprehensive review of the literature. Contraception. 2011;84:465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin C, Gemzell Danielsson K, Bixo M, et al. Combined oral contraceptive use is associated with both improvement and worsening of mood in the different phases of the treatment cycle – a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;76:135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zethraeus N, Dreber A, Ranehill E, et al. Combined oral contraceptives and sexual function in women – a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:4046–4053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zethraeus N, Dreber A, Ranehill E, et al. A first-choice combined oral contraceptive influences general well-being in healthy women: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1238–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovlund CW, Mørch LS, Kessing LV, et al. Association of hormonal contraception with depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:1154–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen A, Meier A, Panis K, et al. 'Fertility awareness-based methods' and subfertility: a systematic review. Facts Views Vis Ob Gyn. 2014;6:113–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarpa B, Dunson D, Giacchi E. Bayesian selection of optimal rules for timing intercourse to conceive by using calendar and mucus. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:915–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu Q, Fehring R. Efficacy of achieving pregnancy with fertility-focused intercourse. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2014;39:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation – effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1517–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank-Herrmann P, Jacobs C, Jenetzky E, et al. Natural conception rates in subfertile couples following fertility awareness training. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund Scherwitzl E, Lindén Hirschberg A, Scherwitzl R. Identification and prediction of the fertile window using NaturalCycles. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20:403–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunson D, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, et al. Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1835–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ. 2000;321:1259–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behre HM, Kuhlage J, Gaβner C, et al. Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2478–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund Scherwitzl E, Gemzell Danielsson K, Sellberg JA, et al. Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc.1958;53:457–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B Method. 1972;34:187–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Stern J. Long-acting, more effective copper T IUDs: a summary of U.S. experience, 1970-75. Stud Fam Plann. 1979;10:263–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, et al. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 2008;77:10–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo M, Jennings V, Nikula M, et al. Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:885–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo M, Jennings V, Sinai I. Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method. Contraception. 2002;65:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank-Herrmann P, Heil J, Gnoth C, et al. The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1310–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar