References
- The Constitution (Amendment) Bill. (Insertion of new article 47A), Rajya Sabha; 2020.
- SCC. The SCC Online Blog [Internet]. EBC Publishing; 2020. Available from: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2020/02/11/the-constitution-amendment-bill-2020-introduced-in-rajya-sabha-bill-to-encourage-two-child-policy/
- MOHFW. Annual Report 2018–19. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2020.
- UN. World contraceptive use New York: United Nations, Department of Economic & Social Affairs; 2019. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/contraception/wcu2019.asp
- SyamRoy B. India’s journey towards sustainable population. Cham: Springer; 2017.
- Dhar A. Gendered approach to sterilisation. The Hindu. 1 January 2015. Available from: https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/policy-and-issues/gendered-approach-to-sterilisation/article6742284.ece
- Muttreja P, Banerjee A, Apte K, et al. Robbed of choice and dignity: Indian women dead after mass sterilisation. New Delhi: Population Foundation of India; 2014.
- Krishnakumar S. Pioneering experiment in massive vasectomy camps. Stud Fam Plann. 1972;3:177–185.
- Padmadas SS. Inside India’s sterilisation camps: the conversation; 2014. Available from: http://theconversation.com/inside-indias-sterilisation-camps-34208
- Masih M, Barpanda S, Wynne Z. Mistreatment and coercion: unethical sterilization in India. New Delhi: Socio-Legal Information Center; 2018.
- Ashok KM. Are you framing national health policy or not: SC asks Centre: Live Law.in; 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 29]. Available from: www.livelaw.in/framing-national-health-policy-not-sc-asks-centre/
- Veatch RM. Government population incentives: ethical issues at stake. Studies in Fam Plan. 1977;8:100–108.
- Rowlands S, Wale J. Sterilisations at delivery or after childbirth: addressing continuing abuses in the consent process. Global Public Health. 2019;14(8):1153–1166.
- Luksaite E. The intimate state: female sterilisation, reproductive agency and operable bodies in rural North India: Brunel University, London; 2016.
- Sifris R. The involuntary sterilisation of marginalised women: power, discrimination and intersectionality. Griffith Law Rev. 2016;25:45–70.
- Thakor VH, Patel VM. The Gujarat massive vasectomy campaign. Stud Fam Plann. 1972;3:186–192.
- Manson NC, O’Neill O. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
- Cooper B. Intersectionality. In: Disch L, Hawkesworth M, editors. The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 385–406.
- Minkler M. “Thinking the unthinkable”: the prospect of compulsory sterilization in India. Int J Health Serv. 1977;7:237–248.
- Chayanika. Maharashtra state population policy. Indian J Med Ethics. 2001;IX:22–23.
- Solinger T, Nakachi M. Reproductive states: global perspectives on the invention and implementation of population policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
- Ashcroft R. Incentives, nudges and the burden of proof in ethical argument. J Med Ethics. 2017;43:137.
- Sunstein CR. Choosing not to choose: understanding the value of choice. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2015.
- Hertwig R. Beyond nudging: how to boost medical decision making. Keynote. 16th Biennial European Conference of the Society for Medical Decision Making; 13 December; London; 2016.
- Grüne-Yanoff T, Hertwig R. Nudge versus boost: how coherent are policy and theory? Minds Machines. 2016;26:149–183.
- Cleland J, Mauldin WP. The promotion of family planning by financial payments: the case of Bangladesh. Studies in Fam Plan. 1991;22:1–18.
- Doane D. Is India’s sterilisation programme barbaric and anti-women? Guardian. 12 November 2014. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/nov/12/indias-sterilisation-drive-is-barbaric-and-disproportionately-targeted-at-women
- MOHFW. Annual Report 2017–18. New Delhi: Department of Health & Family Welfare; 2019.
- Vicziany M. Coercion in a Soft State: the family planning program of India: part 2: the sources of coercion. Pacific Affairs. 1982;55:237–592.
- Bellows NM, Askey I, Bellows B. Review of performance-based incentives in community-based family planning programmes. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41:146–151.
- Mishral M. Bring 500 for sterilization, take home a Nano Gurgaon; 2013 [cited 2018 Feb 8]. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhopal/Bring-500-for-sterilization-take-home-a-Nano/articleshow/19013834.cms
- Bader S. Is incentive-based pay for India’s commmunity health workers working? Devex; 2017. Available from: https://www.devex.com/news/is-incentive-based-pay-for-india-s-community-health-workers-working-90502
- Brault MA, Schensul SL, Singh R, et al. Multilevel perspectives on female sterilization in low-income communities in Mumbai, India. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1550–1560.
- HRW. India: target-driven sterilisation harming women. Human Rights Watch; 2012 [cited 2018 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/07/12/india-target-driven-sterilization-harming-women
- FIGO. Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology. London: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2015. Available from: http://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/wg-publications/ethics/FIGO%20Ethical%20Issues%202015.pdf4893.pdf
- UN. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. New York: United Nations; 1979.
- UN. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo, 5–13 September 1994). New York: United Nations; 1994.
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
- Rowlands S, Ingham R. Long-acting reversible contraception: conflicting perspectives of advocates and potential users. BJOG. 2017;124:1474–1476.