References
- Public Health England. Sexually transmitted infections and screening for Chlamydia in England, 2017. Health Protection report. London: Public Health England; 2018a. [cited 2020 March 25]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections-stis-annual-data-tables
- Public Health England. Health matters: reproductive health and pregnancy planning. London: Public Health England; (2018b). [cited 2020 March 25]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-reproductive-health-and-pregnancy-planning/health-matters-reproductive-health-and-pregnancy-planning
- Development Economics. Unprotected nation: the financial and economic impacts of restricted contraceptive and sexual health services. London: Society of Sexual health Advisors; 2013. [cited 2020 March 23]. Available from: http://ssha.info/wp-content/uploads/Unprotected-Nation.pdf
- Wong, T, Singh, A, Mann, J, et al. Gender differences in bacterial STIs in Canada. BMC women's health. 2004;4(1):S26.
- Kimport K. More than a physical burden: women’s mental and emotional work in preventing pregnancy. J Sex Res. 2018;55(9):1096–1105.
- Webster R, Michie S, Estcourt C, et al. Increasing condom use in heterosexual men: development of a theory-based interactive digital intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(3):418–427.
- East L, Jackson D, O’Brien L, et al. Condom negotiation: experiences of sexually active young women. J Adv Nurs. 2011;1:77–85.
- Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(3):171–175.
- Parks C, Peipert JF. Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):681–688.
- Blanc AK. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(3):189–213.
- Gallo MF, Kilbourne-Brook M, Coffey PS. A review of the effectiveness and acceptability of the female condom for dual protection. Sex Health. 2012;9(1):18–26.
- Health Link BC. Barrier methods of birth control. [cited 2020 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/health-topics/zm2456
- Leeper MA, Conrardy M. Preliminary evaluation of REALITY, a condom for women to wear. Adv Contracept. 1989;5(4):229–235.
- Peters A, Jansen W, van Driel F. The female condom: the international denial of a strong potential. Reprod Health Matter. 2010;18(35):171–128.
- Mantell JE, West BS, Sue K, et al. Health care providers: A missing link in understanding acceptability of the female condom. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23(1):65–77.
- Ananga MK, Kugbey N, Akporlu M, et al. Knowledge, acceptance and utilisation of the female condom among women of reproductive age in Ghana. Contracept Reprod Med. 2017;2:189.
- Bowling J, Dodge B, Bindra N, et al. Female condom acceptability in urban India: examining the role of sexual pleasure. J Health Psychol. 2018;23(2):218–228.
- Lamvu G, Steiner MJ, Condon S, et al. Consistency between most important reasons for using contraception and current method used: the influence of health care providers. Contraception. 2006;73(4):399–403.
- Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Method Res. 1981;10(2):141–163.
- Noy C. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Method. 2008;11(4):327–344.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Cecil H, Perry MJ, Seal DW, et al. The female condom: what we have learned thus far. AIDS Behav. 1998;2(3):15–56.
- Mantell JE, Scheepers E, Karim QA. Introducing the female condom through the public health sector: experiences from South Africa. AIDS Care. 2000;12(5):589–601.
- Beksinska ME, Rees VH, McIntyre JA, et al. Acceptability of the female condom in different groups of women in South Africa- a multicentred study to inform the national female condom introductory strategy. S Afr Med J. 2001;91(8):672.
- Wang Y, Liao SS, Weeks MR, et al. Acceptability of hypothetical microbicides among women in sex establishments in rural areas in Southern China. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(1):102.
- Hoffman S, Mantell J, Exner T, et al. The future of the female condom. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(3):120–126.
- Witte SS, El‐Bassel N, Gilbert L, et al. Promoting female condom use to heterosexual couples: findings from a randomized clinical trial. Perspect Sex Repro H. 2006;38(3):148–154.
- Fernández ML, Garrido JM, Castro YR, et al. Assessing female condom acceptability among heterosexual Spanish couples. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(3):255–263.
- Kulczycki A, Kim DJ, Duerr A, et al. The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial. Perspect Sex Repro H. 2004;36(3):114–119.
- Hoffman S, Exner TM, Leu CS, et al. Female-condom use in a gender-specific family planning clinic trial. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(11):1897–1903.
- Sapire KE. The female condom (Femidom)-a study of user acceptability. S Afr Med J. 1995;85(10):1081–1084.
- Artz L, Macaluso M, Brill I, et al. Hook 3rd EW. Effectiveness of an intervention promoting the female condom to patients at sexually transmitted disease clinics. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(2):237.
- Public Health England. Condom distribution schemes in England 2015/2016: a survey of English sexual health commissioners. London: Public Health England; 2017. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666306/Condom_Distribution_Schemes_in_England_2015.pdf
- Agha S, Van Rossem R. Impact of mass media campaigns on intentions to use the female condom in Tanzania. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 2002;28(3):255–258.
- Moore L, Beksinska M, Rumphs A, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and behaviors associated with female condoms in developing countries: a scoping review. Open Access J Contracept. 2015;6:125.