Contraception: what is the resistance all about?

References

• Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, et al. Global regional and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesiam hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(4):e380–e389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(1):24–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84(5):478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vital Signs: teen pregnancy – United States, 1991–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(13):414–420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finer L, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellings K, Jones KG, Mercer CH, et al. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Lancet. 2013;382(9907):1807–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakha F, Glasier A. Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1782–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajos N, Leridon H, Goulard H, et al. The COCON Group. Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajos N, Leridon H, Job-Spira N. La contraception et le recours à l'avortement en France dans les années 2000: présentation et premiers résultats de l'enquête Cocon: introduction au dossier. Popul Dev Rev. 2004;59(3):409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Office fédéral de la statistique. Interruptions de grossesse. [Online] [cited 2020 Sep 15]. Available from https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etatsante/reproductive/interruptions-grossesses.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer Serret L, Pairò MS. The place of abortion in the pregnancy decision-making process in young adult women in Catalonia, Spain. Sociol Health Illn. 2018;40(6):1087–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office Fédérale des statistique. Statistique des interruptions de grossesse 2014; [cited 2019 March 31].
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive. Contraception Atlas. [cited 2019 Mar 31]. Available from https://www.contraceptioninfo.eu/sites/contraceptioninfo.eu/files/map_cci-english_english_v9-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office Fédérale de la statistique. Interruptions de grossesse; [cited 2019 May 31]. Available from https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etat-sante/reproductive/interruptions-grossesses.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schünmann C, Glasier A. Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion. Contraception. 2006;73(5):520–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles MS, Makino KK, Stanwood NL. Contraceptive experiences among adolescents who experience unintended birth. Contraception. 2011;84(6):578–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinter B. Continuation and compliance of contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002;7(3):178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundby J, Svanemyr J, Maehre T. Avoiding unwanted pregnancy-the role of communication, information and knowledge in the use of contraception among young Norwegian women. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38(1):11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanzer K. [Psychosomatic aspects of oral contraception]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991;51(12):955–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Valleur J, Wysocki S. Selection of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy: patient communication and counseling issues. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(2 Suppl):S57–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Bohet A. Frequency and correlates of unintended pregnancy risk perceptions. Contraception. 2016;94(2):152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homco JB, Peipert JF, Secura GM, et al. Reasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion services. Contraception. 2009;80(6):569–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz EB, Lohr PA, Gold MA, et al. Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women. Contraception. 2007;75(4):305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JA, Popkin RA, Santelli JS. Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;44(4):236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo S, Askelson NM, Spies EL, et al. Ambivalence, communication and past use: understanding what influences women’s intentions to use contraceptives. Psychol Health Med. 2012;17(3):356–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JA, Hirsch JS, Trussell J. Pleasure, prophylaxis and procreation: a qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(3):130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost JJ, Singh S, Finer LB. Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39(2):90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JA, Wang Y. Which young adults are more likely to use withdrawal? The importance of pregnancy attitudes and pleasure. Contraception. 2015;91(4):320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens-Simon C, Sheeder J, Harter S. Teen contraceptive decisions: childbearing intentions are the tip of the iceberg. Women Health. 2005;42(1):55–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layte R, McGee H, Rundle K, et al. Does ambivalence about becoming pregnant explain social class differentials in use of contraception? Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(5):477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RK. Change and consistency in US women’s pregnancy attitudes and associations with contraceptive use. Contraception. 2017;95(5):485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson EJ, Collier C, Hayes L, et al. Family planning and contraceptive decision-making by economically disadvantaged, African-American women. Contraception. 2013;88(2):289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs JN, Creinin M. Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies. Contraception. 2003;68(5):373–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo SH, Guzzo KB, Hayford SR. Understanding the complexity of ambivalence toward pregnancy: does it predict inconsistent use of contraception? Biodemography Soc Biol. 2014;60(1):49–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendall MS, Harrison EY, Caudillo ML. Intentionally or ambivalently risking a short interpregnancy interval: reproductive-readiness factors in women’s postpartum non-use of contraception. Demography. 2020;57(3):821–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom B, Ferrara M, DeMaria AL, et al. Integrating pregnancy ambivalence and effectiveness in contraceptive choice. Health Commun. 2017;32(7):820–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall C, Afable-Munsuz A, Speizer I, et al. Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans-results of qualitative research. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(2):297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WB. Why some women fail to use their contraceptive method: a psychological investigation. Fam Plan Perspect. 1986;18(1):27–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Askelson NM, Losch ME, Thomas LJ, et al. “Baby? Baby Not?”: exploring women’s narratives about ambivalence towards an unintended pregnancy. Women Health. 2015;55(7):842–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Schwarz EB. Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41(4):238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi-Demicheli F, Perrin E, Bianchi PG, et al. Contraceptive practice before and after termination of pregnancy: a prospective study. Contraception. 2003;67(2):107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond-Smith N, Moreau C, Bishai DM. Reducing unintended pregnancies: a microsimulation of contraceptive switching, discontinuation, and failure patterns in France. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(4):429–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo S, Askelson NA, Spies EL, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancies and improving contraceptive use among young adult women in a rural, Midwestern state: health promotion implications. Women Health. 2010;50(3):279–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Social Pyschol. 1998;28(15):1429–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost JJ, Duberstein Lindberg L, Finer LB. Young adults’ contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;44(2):107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar