Use of contraception and attitudes towards contraceptive use in Swedish women: an internet-based nationwide survey

References

• Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–e1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exelgyn. Abortion Statistics, Abortion rates per 1,000 women aged 15–49. 2018. [updated February 2020; cited 2021 December 7th]. Available from: https://abort-report.eu/europe/
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Abortion statistics in Sweden 2020. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2021. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikamnen/aborter/
   Google Scholar
• Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1998–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose SB, Lawton BA. Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):37.e1–37.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron ST, Glasier A, Chen ZE, et al. Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy. Bjog. 2012;119(9):1074–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Induced abortions in the Nordic countries 2019. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2021. Available from: https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/141157/Aborter_i_Norden_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Emtell Iwarsson K, Envall N, Bizjak I, et al. Increasing uptake of long-acting reversible contraception with structured contraceptive counselling: cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial). BJOG. 2021;128(9):1546–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Roumen F, et al. The CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012;17(1):65–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp Kallner H, Thunell L, Brynhildsen J, et al. Use of contraception and attitudes towards contraceptive use in Swedish Women - A Nationwide Survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrom A, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H. Trends in use and attitudes towards contraception in Sweden: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(2):154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala C, Schweiger P. Österreichischer Verhütungsreport 2019. 2012. September, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Statistikdatabasen 2021. [cited 2022 June 16th]. Available from: statistikdatabasen.scb.se
   Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;120(6):1291–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Adolescent pregnancy and its outcomes across countries. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2015. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adolescent-pregnancy-and-its-outcomes-across-countries
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstock JR, Peipert JF, Madden T, et al. Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1298–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Pliskin E. Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016. F S Rep. 2020;1(2):83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hognert H, Skjeldestad FE, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Ecological study on the use of hormonal contraception, abortions and births among teenagers in the Nordic countries. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e022473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Bohet A, Trussell J, et al. Estimates of unintended pregnancy rates over the last decade in France as a function of contraceptive behaviors. Contraception. 2014;89(4):314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajos N, Leridon H, Goulard H, et al. Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall N, Emtell Iwarsson K, Bizjak I, et al. Evaluation of satisfaction with a model of structured contraceptive counseling: results from the LOWE trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(11):2044–2052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emtell Iwarsson K, Larsson EC, Bizjak I, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception and satisfaction with structured contraceptive counselling among non-migrant, foreign-born migrant and second-generation migrant women: evidence from a cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial) in Sweden. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022;48(2):128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza D, Watson CJ, Taft A, et al. Increasing long-acting reversible contraceptives: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4s):S921.e1–S921.e13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taft A, Watson CJ, McCarthy E, et al. Sustainable and effective methods to increase long‐acting reversible contraception uptake from the ACCORd general practice trial. Aus NZ J of Public Health. 2022. DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.13242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinger J, Minh TD, Buttmann N, et al. Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large U.S. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm T, Lamvu G, Carrillo J, et al. Continuous vs. cyclic combined hormonal contraceptives for treatment of dysmenorrhea: a systematic review. Contracept X. 2019;1:100002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelman A, Micks E, Gallo MF, et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;29(7):CD004695.
   Google Scholar