Interventions to support contraceptive choice and use: a global systematic map of systematic reviews

References

• Chant S. Population and development: the demographic transition. Prog Dev Stud. 2011;11(3):253–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• un.org [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2020 Jan 30 [cited 2021 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/World_Fertility_and_Family_Planning_2020_Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• un.org [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2019 Dec 31 [cited 2021 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, et al. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1642–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un.org [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2019 Dec 31 [cited 2021 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/familyPlanning_DataBooklet_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Starbird E, Norton M, Marcus R. Investing in family planning: key to achieving the sustainable development goals. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):191–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• unfpa.org [Internet]. New York: UNFPA; 2019. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/UNFPA_HERA_5-6-1_CLEAN_02_March1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• guttmacher.org [Internet]. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/unmet-need-for-contraception-in-developing-countries
   Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, et al. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1810–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family planning: accelerating the way ahead. Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. Europe: [cited 2022 Jun23]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/322275/Action-plan-sexual-reproductive-health.pdf
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza P, Bailey JV, Stephenson J, et al. Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(5):364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson D, Russell K, Becker L, et al. The evolution of a new publication type: steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(3-4):198–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goren DG, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm (Sweden): institute for Futures Studies; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AL, Lemos A, Figueiroa JN, et al. Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Nirantharakumar K, Truchanowicz EG, et al. Motivational interviews to improve contraceptive use in populations at high risk of unintended pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;191:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos MK, Bartholomew NE, Lohr KN. Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda. Contraception. 2003;67(2):115–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith ME, Aicken CR, Saxena S, et al. Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;14(3):CD008896.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD004317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Steiner M, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;30(4):CD006964.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam RW, Hendry M, Booth A, et al. Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riedel EMC, Turner DT, Kobeissi LH, et al. The impact of psychosocial interventions on condom and contraceptive use in LMICs: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Glob Public Health. 2020;15(8):1182–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen BN, Rivera MI, Ahrens KA, et al. Clinic-based programs to prevent repeat teen pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):736–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart H, McCall SJ, McPherson C, et al. Effectiveness of peri-abortion counselling in preventing subsequent unplanned pregnancy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016;42(1):59–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez LM, Stockton LL, Chen M, et al. Behavioral interventions for improving dual-method contraceptive use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;30(3):CD010915.
   Google Scholar
• Mack N, Crawford TJ, Guise JM, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CD004317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hindin MJ, Kalamar AM, Thompson TA, et al. Interventions to prevent unintended and repeat pregnancy among young people in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the published and gray literature. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(3 Suppl):S8–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro FL, Benova L, Owolabi OO, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn’t? BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46(4):254–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata LB, Tregear SJ, Curtis KM, et al. Impact of contraceptive counseling in clinical settings: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2 Suppl 1):S31–S45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Willan A, et al. Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2002;324(7351):1426–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett SE, Assefi NP. School-based teenage pregnancy prevention programs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36(1):72–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, et al. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD005215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blank L, Baxter SK, Payne N, et al. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the effectiveness of contraceptive service interventions for young people, delivered in health care settings. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(6):1102–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Chen M, et al. School-based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):CD012249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason-Jones AJ, Crisp C, Momberg M, et al. A systematic review of the role of school-based healthcare in adolescent sexual, reproductive, and mental health. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen J, Carroll C, Cooke J, et al. School-linked sexual health services for young people (SSHYP): a survey and systematic review concerning current models, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and research opportunities. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(30):1–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CR, Free C. Evaluations of the peer‐led approach in adolescent sexual health education: a systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(3):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolli MV. Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention, adolescent pregnancy prevention and sexual health promotion for young people: a systematic review of European studies. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(5):904–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows B, Bulaya C, Inambwae S, et al. Family planning vouchers in low and Middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):357–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korachais C, Macouillard E, Meessen B. How user fees influence contraception in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):341–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacklock C, MacPepple E, Kunutsor S, et al. Paying for performance to improve the delivery and uptake of family planning in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):309–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan ME, Hazra A, Kant A, et al. Conditional and unconditional cash transfers to improve use of contraception in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karra M, Canning D, Hu J, et al. Community‐based financing of family planning in developing countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):325–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belaid L, Dumont A, Chaillet N, et al. Effectiveness of demand generation interventions on use of modern contraceptives in low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(10):1240–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau F, Da Silva Godineau SM, De Casabianca C, et al. State of knowledge on smartphone applications concerning contraception: a systematic review. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(2):83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith C, Gold J, Ngo TD, et al. Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving contraception use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(6):CD011159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zapata LB, Pazol K, Rollison JM, et al. Family planning reminder systems: an updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):716–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung B, Mitchell JW, Braun KL. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for improving contraceptive use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(4):813–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, et al. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulu EM, Sukwa T. Impact of mHealth on contraceptive use among women and men of reproductive age in low- and Middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25(10):1182–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazol K, Zapata LB, Dehlendorf C, et al. Impact of contraceptive education on knowledge and decision making: an updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):703–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Grey TW, Hiller JE, et al. Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD001863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewart CM, Serpico J, Steiner MJ, et al. Electronic interventions for changing knowledge, attitudes or practices regarding contraception: a systematic review. Contraception. 2019;100(1):10–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Grey TW, Tolley EE, et al. Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3(3):CD012025. (3):
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma AE, Frederiksen BN, Malcolm NM, et al. Community education and engagement in family planning: updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):747–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakhisi AS, Allotey P, Dhillon N, et al. The effectiveness of social marketing in reduction of teenage pregnancies: a review of studies in developed countries. Soc Mar Q. 2011;17(1):56–90.
   Google Scholar
• Carter MW, Tregear ML, Moskosky SB. Community education for family planning in the U.S.: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:S107–S115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawad A, Jawad I, Alwan NA. Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD012521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby D. The impact of programs to increase contraceptive use among adult women: a review of experimental and quasi‐experimental studies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(1):34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain AW, Loyola Briceno AC, Pazol K, et al. Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: a systematic review update. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):725–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding JF, Knab J, Zief S, et al. A systematic review of programs to promote aspects of teen parents’ self-sufficiency: supporting educational outcomes and healthy birth spacing. Matern Child Health J. 2020;24(Suppl 2):84–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott VK, Gottschalk LB, Wright KQ, et al. Community health workers’ provision of family planning services in low‐and middle‐income countries: a systematic review of effectiveness. Stud Fam Plann. 2015;46(3):241–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Chandra-Mouli V, Jain K, et al. Community based reproductive health interventions for young married couples in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(15):1037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desrosiers A, Betancourt T, Kergoat Y, et al. A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar