Does change in the shape of intrauterine contraceptive device Cu 375 and Cu T 380A affect the expulsion after post-partum insertion – a prospective randomized control trial

References

• Indian National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). 16 [FR339]. 2015 https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers - Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. 2007. https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/guidelines/nrhm-guidelines/family-planning/medical_officer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cwiak C, Cordes S. Postpartum intrauterine device placement: a patient-friendly option. Contracept Reprod Med. 2018;3:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Contraceptive use by method 2019_databooklet by United Nations. 2019. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sonalkar S, Kapp N. Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: a systematic review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20(1):4–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Beltagy NS, Darwish EA, Kasem MS, et al. Comparison between cupper T380 IUD and multiload 375 IUD in early post partum insertion. Middle East Fert Soc J. 2011;16(2):143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK, Jeng G, et al. Intrauterine device expulsion after postpartum placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):895–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney EP, Sonalkar S, McAllister A, et al. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):183.e1-183–e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucak A, Ozcan S, Çelen Ş, et al. Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reprod Health. 2014;11:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara Ricalde R, Menocal Tobías G, Ramos Pérez C, et al. Estudio comparativo al azar entre los dispositivos intrauterinos multiload Cu375 y TCu 380A, colocados durante el posparto [random comparative study between intrauterine device multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006;74(6):306–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merki-Feld GS, Schwarz D, Imthurn B, et al. Partial and complete expulsion of the multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137(1):92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Kumar M, Aggarwal P, et al. A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion and continuation rates of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in indian women at a premier hospital in new delhi, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(9):3992–4001.
   Google Scholar
• From the World Health Organization- A Global Handbook of Family Planning 2018. https://www.fphandbook.org/world-health-organization
   Google Scholar
• Ragab A, Hamed HO, Alsammani MA, et al. Expulsion of Nova-T380, multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(2):174–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthwaite LM, Sheeder J, Hyer J, et al. Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):674.e1-674–e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta AU, Patel B. A follow up study of 100 clients of PPIUCD insertion. Gujrat Medical Journal. 2019;74(1):39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam R, N A, S K, et al. Overview of immediate PPIUCD application in bundelkhand region. jemds. 2014;3(36):9518–9526.
   Google Scholar
• Geda YF, Nejaga SM, Belete MA, et al. Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device utilization and influencing factors in Addis Ababa public hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Contracept Reprod Med. 2021;6(1):4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xess S, Sharma M, Rajoria L, et al. A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion, removal and continuation of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in Indian women. Internat J Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2018;2(1):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jakhar R, Singhal G. Safety and efficacy of intra-caesarean IUCD: a prospective study at a tertiary care Centre. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(4):325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain N, Choudhari HK. A prospective study of acceptability, safety and demographic profile for post placental intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(7):2674–2685.
   Google Scholar
• Jairaj S, Dayyala S. A cross sectional study on acceptability and safety of IUCD among postpartum mothers at tertiary care hospital, Telangana. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):LC01–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maluchuru DS, Aruna DV, Prabhavathi DN. Post-Partum – intrauterine device insertion 2yr experience at a tertiary care center in guntur medical college/govt. General hospital, Guntur. IOSR J Dental Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS). 2015;14(3):56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, et al. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;5:CD003036.
   Google Scholar
• Lerma K, Bhamrah R, Singh S, et al. Importance of the delivery-to-insertion interval in immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a secondary analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149(2):154–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav V, Balasubramaniam S, Das S, et al. Comparison of outcomes at 6 weeks following postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions by doctors and nurses in India: a case-control study. Contraception. 2016;93(4):347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petta CA, Faúndes D, Pimentel E, et al. The use of vaginal ultrasound to identify copper T IUDs at high risk of expulsion. Contraception. 1996;54(5):287–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Rosello J. Spontaneous upward movement of lowly placed T-shaped IUDs. Contraception. 2005;72(6):430–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Das V, Agarwal A, et al. A dedicated postpartum intrauterine device inserter: pilot experience and proof of concept. Global Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(1):132–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FSRH Clinical Guideline: Intrauterine Contraception 2015. https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/ceuguidanceintrauterinecontraception/
   Google Scholar
• Dias T, Abeykoon S, Kumarasiri S, et al. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(1):104–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muganyizi PS, Kimario G, Ponsian P, et al. Clinical outcomes of postpartum intrauterine devices inserted by midwives in tanzania. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 1):38–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Albuquerque CU, Rios CEGF, Figueiredo ET, et al. Continuation and satisfaction with intrauterine copper device inserted during caesarean delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021;26(6):486–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintomide H, Brima N, Mansour DJ, et al. Copper IUD continuation, unwanted effects and cost consequences at 1 year in users aged under 30 - a secondary analysis of the EURAS-IUD study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021;26(3):175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averbach SH, Ermias Y, Jeng G, et al. Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroğlu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006;74(5):376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates M, Styles D, Janes J, et al. Identifying barriers to post-placental intrauterine device placement: male partners’ views. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020;25(2):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divya D, Dewan R. Clinical outcome of post placental copper T380A and copper 375 IUCD insertion in women delivering by caesarean section. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(9):3731.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Singh S. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) in vaginal and caesarean section deliveries: a hospital based study. MAMC J Med Sci. 2020;6(3):199.
   Google Scholar