International actors as critics of domestic freedoms: the role of expertise and benefits

References

• Abrahams, A., & Leber, A. (2020). Framing a murder: Twitter influencers and the Jamal Khashoggi incident. Mediterranean Politics, 26(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2019.1697089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andı, S., Aytaç, E., & Çarkoğlu, A. (2020). Internet and social media use and political knowledge: Evidence from Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 25(5), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2019.1635816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Loser’s consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, M., & Acikmese, S. (2007). Europeanization through EU conditionality: Understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans Online, 9(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701689944
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Haohan Chen, M. B., Hunzaker, F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/37/9216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benstead, L., Kao, K., & Lust, E. (2020). Does it matter what observers say? The impact of international election monitoring on legitimacy. Mediterranean Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1730601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benstead, L. J. (2019). Differentiation and diffusion: Shifting public opinion attitudes toward foreign policy in North Africa. The Journal of North African Studies, 24(4), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2018.1525007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, G., Imai, K., & Lyall, J. (2014). Comparing and combining list and endorsement experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, W., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2011). Statistical analysis of endorsement experiments: Measuring support for militant groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis, 19(4), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S., & Jamal, A. (2015). Anti-Americanism, authoritarian politics, and attitudes about women’s representation: Evidence from a survey experiment in Jordan. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12139
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S., & Prather, L. (2020). Foreign meddling and mass attitudes toward international economic engagement. International Organization, 74(3), 584–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S., & Prather, S. L. (2018). Who’s there? Election observer identity and the local credibility of elections. International Organization, 72(3), 659–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu, F., & Garcia-Ponce, O. (2015). Partisan losers’ effects: Perceptions of electoral integrity in Mexico. Electoral Studies, 39(0261-3794), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoglu, A. (2003). Who wants full membership? Characteristics of Turkish public support for EU membership. Turkish Studies, 4(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005717
   Google Scholar
• Corstange, D., & Marinov, N. (2012). Taking sides in other people’s elections: The polarizing effect of foreign intervention. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00583.x
   Google Scholar
• Daxecker, U., & Schneider, G. (2014). Election monitoring. In P. Norris, R. Frank, & F. M. I Coma (Eds.), Advancing electoral integrity (pp. xx–xxx). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Draege, J. B. (2021). Parliamentary discussions in authoritarian contexts: Introducing a dataset on party responses to Turkey’s Gezi protests. Mediterranean Politics, 26(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2019.1681714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., & Green, D. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Groemping, M. (2017). Domestic election monitoring and advocacy: An emerging research Agenda. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2017.1401776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., Hyde, S., & Wellman, B. 2015. “Election quality and public confidence in political institutions: Revisiting the orange revolution.” Manuscript, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, S. D. (2008). Observing norms: Explaining the causes and consequences of internationally monitored elections [Ph. D. Thesis]. Department of Political Science, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchley, N. (2021). Fraud in the 2018 Egyptian presidential election? Mediterranean Politics, 26(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2019.1673634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köse, T., Özcan, M., & Karakoç, E. (2016). A comparative analysis of soft power in the MENA region: The impact of ethnic, sectarian, and religious identity on soft power in Iraq and Egypt. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2014). Improving governance from the outside in. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-120611-231838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, Y., & Voeten, E. (2012). Precedent in international courts: A network analysis of case citations by the European court of human rights. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000433
   Google Scholar
• Lust, E. (2011). Missing the third wave: Islam, institutions, and democracy in the Middle East. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-011-9086-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoud, T. (2008). Islamist parties and democracy: Are they democrats? Does it matter? Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molz, G., & Stiller, M. (2021). Attitudes and opinions about refugees in germany–correlates with conspiracy and political mindsets. Current Psychology, 40, 2201–2210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Sika, N. (2021). Euro-Mediterranean partnership and youth policies in the MENA: Why policy discourse travels but implementation doesn’t. Mediterranean Politics, 26(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1749816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, E., Masoud, T., & Jamal, A. A. (2018). Arab responses to western hegemony: Experimental evidence from Egypt. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(2), 254–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716648738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, T. (2010). A post-communist transition in two acts: The 1996-7 antigovernment struggle in Bulgaria as a bridge between the 1989-92 and 1996-2007 democratization waves in Eastern Europe. In K. Stoner-Weiss, V. Bunce, & M. McFaul (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the post-communist world (pp. 107–133). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). With a little help from my friends: Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. (2017). Political orientation, information and perceptions of election fraud: Evidence from Russia. British Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org
   Google Scholar
• Rozenas, A. (2014). Electoral transparency and manipulation technologies in non-democratic elections. APSA 2014 Conference Paper, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Taniyici, Ş. (2010). Europeanization of political elite discourses in Turkey: A content analysis of parliamentary debates 1994–2002. Turkish Studies, 11(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2010.483853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., & Weeks, J. (2020). Public opinion and foreign electoral intervention. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeğen, M. (2007). Turkish nationalism and the Kurdish question. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(1), 119–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870601006603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, H. (2011). Euroscepticism in Turkey: Parties, elites, and public opinion. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608741003594353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar