The networked leader: understanding peer influence in a system wide leadership team

References

• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Arifovic, J., B. C. Eaton, and G. Walker. 2015. “The Coevolution of Beliefs and Networks.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 120: 46–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1995. “Exercise of Personal and Collective Efficacy in Changing Societies.” In Self-efficacy in Changing Societies, edited by A. Bandura, 1–45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battersby, S. L., and B. Verdi. 2015. “The Culture of Professional Learning Communities and Connections to Improve Teacher Efficacy and Support Student Learning.” Arts Education Policy Review 116 (1): 22–29. doi: 10.1080/10632913.2015.970096
   Google Scholar
• Baumard, P., and W. H. Starbuck. 2005. “Learning From Failures: Why it may not Happen.” Long Range Planning 38 (3): 281–298. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. 2002. Netdraw Network Visualization. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., and B. Schneider. 2002. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. UK: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervone, H. F. 2008. “Breaking out of Sacred Cow Culture: The Relationship of Professional Advice Networks to Receptivity to Innovation in Academic Librarians.” In Advances in Library Administration and Organization, edited by D. Williams and J. Golden, 71–149. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., and J. L. Russell. 2008. “District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks.” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 (3): 203–235. doi: 10.3102/0162373708321829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., J. Russell, J. Heath Kaufman, and M. Kay Stein. 2012. “Supporting Sustainability: Teachers’ Advice Networks and Ambitious Instructional Reform.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 137–182. doi: 10.1086/667699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, V., T. F. Cook, and S. Conley. 2006. “Organizational Learning in Schools and School Systems: Improving Learning, Teaching, and Leading.” Theory Into Practice 45 (2): 107–116. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium on Chicago School Research. 2003. Public use Data set: 2003 Survey of Students and Teachers User’s Manual. Chicago, IL: The Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. 2000. “Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development.” Annual Review of Psychology 51 (1): 665–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, L. C., A. Girardi, and R. J. Coplan. 2006. “Links Between Empathy, Social Behavior, and Social Understanding in Early Childhood.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 21 (3): 347–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnigan, K. S., and A. J. Daly. 2012. “Mind the gap: Organizational Learning and Improvement in an Underperforming Urban System.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 41–71. doi: 10.1086/667700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, H., and M. M. Buehl. 2012. “Spring Cleaning for the “Messy” Construct of Teachers’ Beliefs: What are They? Which Have Been Examined? What can They Tell us?” In Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol 2. Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, edited by K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan, 471–499. New York: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. A., Y.-J. Lo, and M. Sun. 2014. “Social Network Analysis of the Influences of Educational Reforms on Teachers’ Practices and Interactions.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17 (5): 117–134. doi: 10.1007/s11618-014-0554-x
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K., Y. Zhao, and K. Borman. 2004. “Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations Within Organizations: The Case of Computer Technology in Schools.” Sociology of Education 77 (2): 148–171. doi: 10.1177/003804070407700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2014. The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A., A. C. Edmondson, and F. Gino. 2008. “Is Yours a Learning Organization?” Harvard Business Review 863: 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R., and S. Cypress. 2009. “Instructional Leadership: A Model for Change in Alternative Middle Schools.” Middle Grades Research Journal 43: 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., M. Sytch, and A. Tatarynowicz. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure.” Organization Science 23 (2): 449–471. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., and S. Greenberg. 2004. “The Importance of Awareness for Team Cognition in Distributed Collaboration.” In Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance, edited by E. Salas, and S. M. Fiore, 177–201. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. 2002. “Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of new Media.” The Information Society 18 (5): 385–401. doi: 10.1080/01972240290108195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, S. J., and L. V. Coote. 2014. “Organizational Culture, Innovation, and Performance: A Test of Schein's Model.” Journal of Business Research 67 (8): 1609–1621. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hombrados-Mendieta, I., and F. Cosano-Rivas. 2013. “Burnout, Workplace Support, job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction among Social Workers in Spain: A Structural Equation Model.” International Social Work 56 (2): 228–246. doi: 10.1177/0020872811421620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M., J. P. Spillane, P. Jakopovic, and R. M. Heaton. 2013. “Infrastructure Redesign and Instructional Reform in Mathematics: Formal Structure and Teacher Leadership.” The Elementary School Journal 114 (2): 200–224. doi: 10.1086/671935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M.2004. Learning Together, Leading Together: Changing Schools Through Professional Learning Communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horng, E., and S. Loeb. 2010. “New Thinking About Instructional Leadership.” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (3): 66–69. doi: 10.1177/003172171009200319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. C., J. B. Unger, D. Soto, K. Fujimoto, M. A. Pentz, M. Jordan-Marsh, and T. W. Valente. 2014. “Peer Influences: the Impact of Online and Offline Friendship Networks on Adolescent Smoking and Alcohol use.” Journal of Adolescent Health 54 (5): 508–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., G. Marietta, M. C. Higgins, K. L. Mapp, and A. Grossman. 2015. Achieving Coherence in District Improvement: Managing the Relationship Between the Central Office and Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juvonen, J. 2007. “Reforming Middle Schools: Focus on Continuity, Social Connectedness, and Engagement.” Educational Psychologist 42 (4): 197–208. doi: 10.1080/00461520701621046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandemir, D., and N. Acur. 2012. “Examining Proactive Strategic Decision-Making Flexibility in new Product Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (4): 608–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., and W. Tsai. 2003. Social Networks and Organizations. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. 1999. “Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions.” Annual Review of Psychology 50: 569–598. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., D. J. Bergman, R. Flores, K. Mason, and A. R. Jack. 2014. “Microblogging About Teaching: Nurturing Participatory Cultures Through Collaborative Online Reflection with pre-Service Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 40: 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. 2005. Educational Leadership. A Review of the Research. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success LSS, The Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., C. Day, P. Sammons, A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2006. Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., L. Leonard, and L. Sharratt. 1998. “Conditions Fostering Organizational Learning in Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 34 (2): 243–276. doi: 10.1177/0013161X98034002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A. 2000. “Networks as Learning Communities: Shaping the Future of Teacher Development.” Journal of Teacher Education 51 (3): 221–227. doi: 10.1177/0022487100051003010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., and L. Miller. 2016. “Learning Communities: Harness the Energy of Collaboration.” The Learning Professional 37 (1): 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, Y.-H. 2016. “Tied to the Common Core: Exploring the Characteristics of Reform Advice Relationships of Educational Leaders.” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (5): 793–840. doi: 10.1177/0013161X16664116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, Y.-H., and A. J. Daly. 2018. “Investigating Leader Self-Efficacy Through Policy Engagement and Social Network Position.” Educational Policy. doi: 10.1177/0895904818773904
   Google Scholar
• Liou, Y.-H., and A. J. Daly. 2019. “The Lead Igniter: A Longitudinal Examination of Influence and Energy Through Networks, Efficacy, and Climate.” Educational Administration Quarterly 55 (3): 363–403. doi: 10.1177/0013161X18799464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, Y.-H., N. M. Moolenaar, and A. J. Daly. 2016. “Developing and Assessing Educator Beliefs About the Common Core.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 28 (4): 377–404. doi: 10.1007/s11092-015-9227-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., G. L. Herman, J. H. Tomkin, J. P. Mestre, and M. West. 2018. “Spreading Teaching Innovations in Social Networks: The Bridging Role of Mentors.” Journal for STEM Education Research 1 (1-2): 60–84. doi: 10.1007/s41979-018-0002-6
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, W., H. Silins, and K. A. Leithwood. 2004. Educational Leadership for Organisational Learning and Improved Student Outcomes. Vol. 3. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.” Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 242–266. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, A. 2012. Collaboration is key when planning Common Core implementation. Core Connection, May 9. ASCD. http://www.ascd.org/common-core/core-connection/050912-oakes-lexington.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Improving School Leadership volume 1: Policy and Practice. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. Leadership for 21st Century Learning: Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. What Makes a School a Learning Organisation? A Guide for Policy Makers, School Leaders and Teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., M. R. Riel, A. Krause, and K. A. Frank. 2009. “Analyzing Teachers’ Professional Interactions in a School as Social Capital: A Social Network Approach.” Teachers College Record 1111: 124–163.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., M. Sun, K. A. Frank, and H. A. Gallagher. 2012. “Using Social Network Analysis to Study how Collegial Interactions can Augment Teacher Learning From External Professional Development.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 103–136. doi: 10.1086/667756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J., K. Pyhältö, T. Soini, and K. Salmela-Aro. 2013. “Reducing Teacher Burnout: A Socio-Contextual Approach.” Teaching and Teacher Education 35: 62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, V., and J. P. Spillane. 2009. “Using Social Network Methods to Study School Leadership.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 32 (2): 185–207. doi: 10.1080/17437270902946660
   Google Scholar
• Porac, J. F., H. Thomas, F. Wilson, D. Paton, and A. Kanfer. 1995. “Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 203–227. doi: 10.2307/2393636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, S. D., and F. B. De Waal. 2002. “Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K. 2014. “Face-to-face Versus Virtual Teams: What Have we Really Learned?” The Psychologist-Manager Journal 17 (1): 2–29. doi: 10.1037/mgr0000009
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G. 2016. “Principals’ Conceptions of Instructional Leadership and Their Informal Social Networks: An Exploration of the Mechanisms of the Mesolevel.” American Journal of Education 122 (3): 433–464. doi: 10.1086/685851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, M. D. 2016. “It’s the Quality not the Quantity of Ties That Matters.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (2): 227–262. doi: 10.3102/0002831216629207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtfeld, C., D. Mascia, F. Pallotti, and A. Lomi. 2016. “Assimilation and Differentiation: A Multilevel Perspective on Organizational and Network Change.” Social Networks 44: 363–374. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., and K. S. Louis. 2007. Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, L., and T. Westover. 2015. “In the Driver's Seat.” The Learning Professional 363: 24.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., P. Sirinides, and H. May. 2010. “How Principals and Peers Influence Teaching and Learning.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (1): 31–56. doi: 10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W. 2017. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T. 2012. “Professional Learning Networks Designed for Teacher Learning.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 28 (4): 133–138. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and C. Gareis. 2004. “Principals’ Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct.” Journal of Educational Administration 42: 573–585. doi: 10.1108/09578230410554070
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, F. C., and F. Y. Kuo. 2014. “A Study of Social Participation and Knowledge Sharing in the Teachers’ Online Professional Community of Practice.” Computers and Education 72: 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2018. Effective School Leadership for the 21st Century: Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. Bangkok, Thailand: The UNESCO Bangkok Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., and K. Duke. 2004. “What do we Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From two Decades of Scholarship.” Review of Educational Research 74 (3): 255–316. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar