Collaborative inquiry networks: the challenge to promote network leadership capacities in Chile

References

• Ahumada, L., A. Lagos, M. Pino, and A. González. 2019. Informe de evaluación sobre el funcionamiento de las Redes de Mejoramiento Escolar del Ministerio de Educación. Informe Técnico N° 1. LIDERES EDUCATIVOS. Centro de Liderazgo para la Mejora Escolar: Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., A. Dyson, A. Goldrick, and M. West. 2016. “Using Collaborative Inquiry to Foster Equity Within School Systems: Opportunities and Barriers.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 27 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.939591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, P. W., and M. Ainscow. 2018. “School-to-School Support Within a Competitive Education System: Views from the Inside.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 29 (4): 614–633. doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1499534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azorín, C. M., and D. Muijs. 2017. “Networks and Collaboration in Spanish Education Policy.” Educational Research 59 (3): 273–296. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2017.1341817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellei, C. 2015. El gran experimento: Mercado y privatización de la educación chilena. Santiago, Chile: Lom ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Berebitsky, D., and S. J. Salloum. 2017. “The relationship between collective efficacy and teachers’ social networks in urban middle schools.” AERA Open 3 (4): 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2332858417743927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and J. Flood. 2019. Formalise, Prioritise and Mobilise: How School Leaders Secure the Benefits of Professional Learning Networks. Bingley, UK: Emerald Professional Learning Network Series.
   Google Scholar
• Cáceres, P. 2003. “Análisis cualitativo de contenido. Una alternativa metodológica alcanzable.” Psicoperspectivas 2: 53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. 2018. “Realizing Professional Capital by, for, and with the Learning Profession: Lessons from Canada.” In Future Directions of Educational Change: Social Justice, Professional Capital, and Systems Change, edited by H. J. Malone, S. Rincón-Gallardo, and K. Kew, 117–134. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., H. Chestnutt, N. Friel, S. Hall, and K. Lowden. 2016a. “Professional Capital and Collaborative Inquiry Networks for Educational Equity and Improvement?” Journal of Professional Capital and Community 1 (3): 178–197. doi: 10.1108/JPCC-03-2016-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., G. Lindsay, D. Muijs, A. Harris, E. Arweck, and J. Goodall. 2010. “Governance, Leadership, and Management in Federations of Schools.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 53–74. doi: 10.1080/09243450903569734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., K. Lowden, H. Chestnutt, S. Hall, S. McKinney, and N. and Friel. 2016b. The School Improvement Partnership Programme: Sustaining Collaboration and Inquiry to Tackle Educational Inequity. Project Report. Education Scotland, Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., and D. Muijs. 2013. “Does School-to-School Collaboration Promote School Improvement? A Study of the Impact of School Federations on Student Outcomes.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (3): 351–393. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.840319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2008. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, LA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., A. C. Timmermans, and M. P. C. van der Werf. 2018. “The Effects of Teacher Expectation Interventions on Teachers’ Expectations and Student Achievement: Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research and Evaluation 24 (3-5): 180–200. doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1550834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., J. Shulha, U. Luhanga, L. Shulha, T. Christou, and D. Klinger. 2015. “Collaborative Inquiry as a Professional Learning Structure for Educators: a Scoping Review.” Professional Development in Education 41 (4): 640–670. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.933120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Gibson, J., M. Civís-Zaragoza, and J. Guàrdia-Olmos. 2014. “Strengthening Education Through Collaborative Networks: Leading the Cultural Change.” School Leadership & Management 34 (2): 179–200. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2013.856296
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M., and J. Perryman. 2018. “Accountability of School Networks: Who Is Accountable to Whom and for What?” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (6): 942–959. doi: 10.1177/1741143217717272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2018. The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Galdames, S., and A. Gonzalez. 2016. “The Relationship Between Leadership Preparation and the Level of Teachers’ Interest in Assuming a Principalship in Chile.” School Leadership & Management 36 (4): 435–451. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2016.1209178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser Barney, G., and L. Strauss Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Adline de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• González, A., M. Pino-Yancovic, and L. Ahumada-Figueroa. 2017. Transitar desde el mejoramiento escolar al mejoramiento sistémico: Oportunidades y desafíos de las redes escolares en Chile. Nota Técnica N°2-2017, LIDERES EDUCATIVOS, Centro de Liderazgo para la Mejora Escolar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso: Valparaíso, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D. 2018. “School Middle Leaders in Australia, Chile and Singapore.” School Leadership & Management 39 (3-4): 278–296. doi:10.1080/13632434.2018.1512485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M., and C. Chapman. 2009. Leading School-Based Networks. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and M. Jones. 2017. “Leading in Context: Putting International Comparisons Into Perspective.” School Leadership & Management 37 (5): 431–433. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1368864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubers, M. D., and C. L. Poortman. 2018. “Establishing Sustainable School Improvement Through Professional Learning Networks.” In Networks for Learning: Effective Collaboration for Teacher, School and System Improvement, edited by C. Brown and C. L. Poortman, 194–204. London, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S., and L. Earl. 2010. “Learning About Networked Learning Communities.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 27–51. doi: 10.1080/09243450903569718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., K. Seashore-Louis, and S. Anderson. 2012. “Local Education Authorities and Student Learning: The Effects of Policies and Practices.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (2): 133–158. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2011.652125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. 2018. “Characteristics of Effective Leadership Networks: a Replication and Extension.” School Leadership & Management 39 (2): 1364–2626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and V. N. Azah. 2016. “Characteristics of Effective Leadership Networks.” Journal of Educational Administration 54 (4): 409–433. doi:10.1108/JEA-08-2015-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2019. “Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership Revisited.” School Leadership & Management, 1364–2626. doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. 2016. Orientaciones para el apoyo técnico-pedagógico al sistema escolar. Santiago, Chile: División de Educación General.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. 2017. Plan de mejoramiento educativo 2017. Santiago, Chile: División de Educación General.
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, C., M. Pino, J. Campos-Martinez, R. Domínguez, and C. Carreño. 2014. “Master Teachers as Professional Developers: Managing Conflicting Versions of Professionalism.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42 (2): 275–292. doi: 10.1177/1741143213502191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., M. West, and M. Ainscow. 2010. “Why Network? Theoretical Perspectives on Networking.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 5–26. doi: 10.1080/09243450903569692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peurach, D. J., J. L. Glazer, and S. Winchell Lenhoff. 2016. “The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks.” Educational Policy 30 (4): 606–648. doi: 10.1177/0895904814557592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino-Yancovic, M. 2015. “Parents’ Defense of Their Children’s Right to Education: Resistance Experiences Against Public School Closings in Chile.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 10 (3): 254–265. doi: 10.1177/1746197915607279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino-Yancovic, M., A. González, and L. Ahumada. 2018. Indagación colaborativa: Elementos teóricos y prácticos para su uso en redes educativas. Informe Técnico N° 4. LIDERES EDUCATIVOS. Valparaíso, Chile: Centro de Liderazgo para la Mejora Escolar.
   Google Scholar
• Pino-Yancovic, M., A. G. Torres, L. A. Figueroa, and C. Chapman. 2019. School Improvement Networks and Collaborative Inquiry: Fostering Systematic Change in Challenging Contexts. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Poortman, C. L., and C. Brown. 2018. “The Importance of Professional Learning Networks.” In Networks for Learning, edited by C. Brown, and C. L. Poortimand, 32–41. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. N. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincón-Gallardo, S., and M. Fullan. 2016. “Essential Features of Effective Networks in Education.” Journal of Professional Capital and Community 1 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1108/JPCC-09- 2015-0007 doi: 10.1108/JPCC-09-2015-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. 2018. Reduce Change to Increase Improvement. San Francisco, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, M., and F. J. Murillo. 2012. “Políticas educativas de apoyo a escuelas de sectores pobres y de bajo logro académico en Chile: 1990-2011.” Revista Educación 1: 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., C. L. Poortman, and A. Handelzalts. 2016. “Data Teams for School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 27 (2): 228–254. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia-Gutiérrez, C. P., S. Becerra-Peña, J. Mansilla-Sepúlveda, and J. Saavedra-Muñoz. 2011. “Liderazgo de los directivos docentes en contextos vulnerables.” Educación y Educadores 14 (2): 389–409. doi: 10.5294/edu.2011.14.2.8
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. “The Past and Future of Mixed Methods Research: From Data Triangulation to Mixed Model Designs.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 671–702. Thounsand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2006. From Pinochet to the ‘Third Way’: Neoliberalism and Social Transformation in Chile. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. 2010. “School-to-School Cooperation as a Strategy for Improving Student Outcomes in Challenging Contexts.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 93–112. doi: 10.1080/09243450903569767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar