Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Analytical Modeling of AAC Infilled RC Frames

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers [2006] Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41:2006, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Buonopane, S. G. and White, R. N. [1999] “Pseudo-dynamic testing of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 125(6), 578–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comite Europeen de Normalisation [2004] “European Standard EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings,” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. A., Penna, A., and Magenes, G. [2011] “Seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry: from experimental testing of the in-plane capacity of walls to building response simulation,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolšek, M. and Fajfar, P. [2002] “Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo‐dynamic tests,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31(6), 1215–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolšek, M. and Fajfar, P. [2008] “The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four story reinforced concrete frame- A deterministic assessment,” Engineering Structures 30, 1991–2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celarec, D. and Dolšek, M. [2013] “Practice-oriented probabilistic seismic performance assessment of infilled frames with consideration of shear failure of columns,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42(9), 1339–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fardis, M. N. and Panagiotakos, T. B. [1997] “Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings, Part II: Infilled structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1(3), 475–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, A., Netti, A., and Monaco, P. [2012] “The influence of masonry infill on the seismic behavior of RC frame buildings,” Engineering Structures 42, 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hak, S., Morandi, P., Magenes, G., and Sullivan, T. J. [2012] “Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16(supp.1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsan, I. D. and Jirsa, J. O. [1969] “Behavior of concrete under compressive loading,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 95, ST 12, 2543–2563.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, D. C. and Park, R. [1971] “Flexural members with confined concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 97( ST 7), 1969–1990.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, R. E. and Bertero, V. V. [1978] “Earthquake resistance of infilled frames,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 104(6), 973–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahin, S. A. and Shing, P. B. [1985] “Pseudo-dynamic method for seismic testing,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 111(7), 1482–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, A. B., Shing, P. B., Schuller, M. P., and Noland, J.L. [1996] “Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 122(3), 228–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, F. J., Pegon, P., and Verzeletti, G. [1999] “Time-domain identification from seismic pseudo-dynamic test results on civil engineering specimens,” 2nd International Conference on Identification in Engineering Systems, Cromwell Press, Wiltshire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mosalam, K. M. A., White, R. N., and Ayala, G. [1998] “Response of infilled frames using pseudo-dynamic experimentation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 27(6), 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenSees [2011] “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation.” Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Penna, A., Magenes, G., Calvi, G. M., and Costa, A. A. [2008] “Seismic performance of AAC infill and bearing walls with different reinforcement solutions,” Proc. 14^th International Brick-Block Masonry Conference (IB2MAC), Sydney, CD-ROM paper no: 194.
   Google Scholar
• Polyakov, S. V. [1960] “On the interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loaded in the plane of the wall,” Earthquake Engineering, EERI, San Francisco, pp. 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM [2005] Autoclaved Aerated Concrete – Properties, Testing and Design, Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, U. A., Sucuoğlu, H., and Yakut, A. [2013] “Seismic performance of gravity-load designed concrete frames infilled with low-strength masonry” submitted to Earthquakes and Structures.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford Smith, B. and Carter, C. [1969], “A method of analysis for infilled frames,” Institution of Civil Engineers 44, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucuoğlu, H. [2013] “Implications of masonry infill and partition damage on the performance perception in residential buildings after a moderate earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra 29(2), 661–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K., Seki, M., Okada, T., and Tanaka, H. [1975] “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer-actuator on-line system,” Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Center 8: Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Tasligedik, A. S., Pampanin, S., and Palermo, A. [2011] “Damage mitigation strategies of ‘nonstructural’ infill walls: concept and numerical-experimental validation program,” Proc. 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Tomazevic, M. and Gams, M. [2012] “Shaking table study and modelling of the seismic behaviour of confined AAC masonry buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10(3), 863–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Earthquake Code [2007] Specifications for Buildings Constructed in Disaster Areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Uva, G., Raffaele, D., Porco, F. and Fiore, A. [2012] “On the role of equivalent strut models in the seismic assessment of infilled RC buildings,” Engineering Structures 42, 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar