Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Existing Buildings under Earthquake Loading

References

• Ambraseys, N., Simpson, K., and Bommer, J. [1996] “Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe,” Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics 25(4), 371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE [2003] Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 31-03). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE [2007] Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• ATC [1996] ATC 40 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• ATC [2009] ATC-63 Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. and Dhakal, R. [2008] “Error estimation of closed-form solution for annual rate of structural collapse,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37(15), 1721–1737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos Costa, A., Sousa, M., and Carvalho, A. [2008] “Seismic zonation for Portuguese National Annex of Eurocode 8.” Proc. of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• CEN [2005] EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings. European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Deierlein, G. and Haselton, C. [2005] “Benchmarking the collapse safety of code compliant reinforced concrete moment frame building systems.” ATC/JSCA US-Japan Workshop on Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices, Proc. of an International Workshop, Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Deierlein, G., Liel, A., Haselton, C., and Kircher, C. [2008] “ATC-63 methodology for evaluating seismic collapse safety of archetype buildings.” Proc. of the ASCE-SEI Structures Congress, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantidis, D. and Bazzurro, P. [2007] “Safety acceptance criteria for existing structures,” Workshop on Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
   Google Scholar
• DOE [2002] Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities. DOE-STD-1020-2002. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Dolšek, M. [2012] “Simplified method for seismic risk assessment of buildings with consideration of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 8(10), 939–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC8-1 [2009] NP ENV 1998-1. Portuguese National Annex to Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Instituto Português da Qualidade, Caparica, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. and Dolšek, M. [2012] “A practice-oriented estimation of the failure probability of building structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(3), 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracuti, B., Pinho, R., Savoia, M., and Francia, R. [2009] “Verification of displacement-based adaptive pushover through multi-ground motion incremental dynamic analyses,” Engineering Structures 31(8), 1789–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• fib [2003a] “Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings,” Fédération Internationale du Béton, Bulletin n° 24.
   Google Scholar
• fib [2003b] “Displacement-based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings,” Fédération Internationale du Béton, Bulletin n° 25.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz, R. [2004] “Estimating seismic damage and repair costs,” Proc. of the 2004 Earthquake Engineering Symposium for Young Researchers. Charleston, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. [2006] “Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University. Stanford, California.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C., Liel, A., Deierlein, G., Dean, B., and Chou, J. [2011] “Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering 137(4), 481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L. and Krawinkler, H. [2005] “Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations,” Report No. PEER 2005/06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L., Medina, R., and Krawinkler, H. [2002] “Collapse assessment of deteriorating SDOF systems,” Proc. of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 13822 [2010] Bases for Design of Structures — Assessment of Existing Structures, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 2394 [1998] General Principles on Reliability for Structures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., Franchin, P., and Pinto, P. E. [2007] “A scalar damage measure for seismic reliability analysis of RC frames,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36(13), 2059–2079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JCSS [2001] Probabilistic Assessment of Existing Structures. Joint Committee on Structural Safety. RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.
   Google Scholar
• Kircher, C. and Heintz, J. [2008] “Overview and key concepts of the ATC-63 methodology,” Proc. of the ASCE-SEI Structures Congress, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Krawinkler, H. and Lignos, D. [2009] “How to predict the probability of collapse of non-ductile building structures,” in Seismic Risk Assessment and Retrofitting, Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, (Springer: New York), Ch. 17, 10, 343–365.
   Google Scholar
• Liel, A., Haselton, C., Deierlein, G., and Baker, J. [2009] “Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings,” Structural Safety 31(2), 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liel, A., Haselton, C., and Deierlein, G. [2011] “Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: Comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering 137(4), 492–502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafday, A. [2008] “System safety metrics for skeletal structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering 134(3), 499–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC [2008] Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Decreto del Ministero delle infrastrutture, Supplemento Ordinario n.30 alla Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica italiana n.29 del 4/02/2008, Italy (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• NZSEE [2006] “Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquake,” Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• PEER-NGA [2009] NGA Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/. Accessed April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, P. E., Giannini, R., and Franchin, P. [2004] Seismic reliability analysis of structures. IUSS Press, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia: Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C. and Miranda, E. [2009] “Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering.” Report No. 171. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Stanford University. Stanford, California.
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., Costa, A., and Delgado, R. [2011] “Assessment of the statistical distributions of structural demand under earthquake loading,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15(5), 724–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romão, X., Costa, A., and Delgado, R. [2012a] “Statistical characterization of structural demand under earthquake loading. Part 1: Robust estimation of the central value of the data,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16(5), 686–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romão, X., Costa, A., and Delgado, R. [2012b] “Statistical characterization of structural demand under earthquake loading. Part 2: Robust estimation of the dispersion of the data,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16(6), 864–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. and Verboven, S. [2002] “Robust estimation in very small samples,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 40(4), 741–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, M. and Oliveira, C. [1996] “Hazard mapping based on macroseismic data considering the influence of geological conditions,” Natural Hazards 14(2), 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziano, D., Casciati, F., and Faravelli, L. [1983] “Method of seismic fragility for complicated systems,” Proc. of the 2nd Specialist Meeting on Probabilistic Methods in Seismic Risk Assessment for NPP, Committee on Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI), Livermore, California.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. [2002] “Incremental dynamic analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31(3), 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. and Fragiadakis, M. [2010] “Incremental dynamic analysis for seismic performance uncertainty estimation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 39(2), 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, T. and Scholten, N. [2010] “Assessment criteria for existing structures,” Structural Engineering International 20(1), 62–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D., Sullivan, T., and Calvi, G. [2014] “Developing direct displacement-based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18(2), 290–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. and Ellingwood, B. [2005] “The role of fragility assessment in consequence-based engineering,” Earthquake Spectra 21(3), 861–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yohai, V. and Zamar, R. [1988] “High breakdown-point estimates of regression by means of the minimization of an efficient scale,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(402), 406–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. [2007] “Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36(13), 1901–1914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar