Technical Note: Practical Challenges Facing the Selection of Conditional Spectrum-Compatible Accelerograms

References

• Abrahamson, N. A. and Al Atik, L. [2010 ] “Scenario spectra for design ground motions and risk calculation,” 9^th US National and 10^th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., Sandıkkaya, M. A., and Ay, B. Ö. [2014a ] “Compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical-to-horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader Europe region,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(1), 517–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., Sandıkkaya, M. A., and Bommer, J. J. [2014b ]. “Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(1), 359–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., Sandıkkaya, M. A., Şenyurt, M., Azari Sisi, A., Ay, B.Ö., Traversa, P., Douglas, J., Cotton, F., Luzi, L., Hernandez, B., and Godey, S. [2014c ] “Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE),” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(1), 311–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys, N. N., Simpson, K. A., and Bommer, J. J. [1996 ] “Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe,” Earthquake. Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25(4), 371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys, N. N., Douglas, J., Sarma, S. K., and Smit, P. M. [2005 ] “Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3(1), 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay, B. Ö. and Akkar, S. [2012 ] “A procedure on ground motion selection and scaling for nonlinear response of simple structural systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(12), 1693–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. [2011 ] “Conditional mean spectrum: tool for ground-motion selection,” Journal of Structural Engineering 137(3), 322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barani, S., Spallarossa, D., and Bazzurro, P. [2009 ] “Disaggregation of probabilistic ground-motion hazard in Italy,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99(5), 2638–2661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, K. and Bommer, J. J. [2006 ] “Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(4A), 1512–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, K. and Bommer, J. J. [2007 ] “Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 11(1), 13–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J. and Acevedo, A. B. [2004 ] “The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(Special Issue 1), 43–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. [2010 ] “A generalised conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground-motion selection,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 39(12), 1321–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. [2012 ] “The seismic demand hazard and importance of the conditioning intensity measure,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(11), 1417–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratti, N., Stafford, P. J., and Bommer, J. J. [2011 ] “Earthquake accelerogram selection and scaling procedures for estimating the distribution of drift response,” Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 137(3), 345–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton, B. and Abrahamson, N. [2014 ]“Issues and approaches for implementing conditional mean spectra in practice,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P. [2013 ] “Correlation in spectral accelerations for earthquakes in Europe,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42(4), 623–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., D’Ambrisi, A., and De Stefano, M. [2011 ] “Fragility analysis and seismic record selection,” Journal of Structural Engineering 137(3), 379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation [2004 ] Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998-1, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA [2012 ] “Next-generation methodology for seismic performance assessment of buildings,” FEMA P-58, Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. J., Stafford, P. J., and Sullivan, T. J. [2015a ] “Seismic hazard disaggregation in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering: occurrence or exceedance?,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, published online, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2675.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. J., Sullivan, T. J., and Beyer, K. [2015b ] “Evaluation of seismic assessment procedures for determining deformation demands in RC walls,” Earthquakes and Structures 9(4), 911–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Bommer, J. J., and Stafford, P. J. [2008 ] “Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37(14), 1585–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., and Cosenza, E. [2008 ] “Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12(1), 54–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F. and Cornell, C. A. [2002 ] “Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 38(8), 951–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T., Harmsen, S. C., Baker, J. W., and Luco, N. [2013a ] “Conditional spectrum computation incorporating multiple causal earthquakes and ground-motion prediction models,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2A), 1103–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T., Haselton, C. B., and Baker, J. W. [2013b ] “Conditional spectrum-based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk-based assessments,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42(12), 1847–1865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, N. and Bazzurro, P. [2007 ] “Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses?,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36(13), 1813–1835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meletti, C., Galadini, F., Valensise, G., Stucchi, M., Basili, R., Barba, S., Vannucci, G., and Boschi, E. [2008 ] “A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory,” Tectonophysics 450, 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. [2007 ] Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Scordilis, E. M. [2006 ] “Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude,” Journal of Seismology 10, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J. [2010 ] “Capacity design considerations for RC frame-wall structures,” Earthquakes and Structures 1(4), 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J., Welch, D. P., and Calvi, G. M. [2014 ] “Simplified seismic performance assessment and implications for seismic design,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations 13(1), 95–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenier, E., Sandıkkaya, M. A. and Akkar, S. [2010 ] “Report on the Fundamental Features of the Extended Strong-Motion Databank Prepared for the SHARE Project,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar