Improved Seismic Design of Concentrically X-Braced Steel Frames to Eurocode 8

References

• AISC. [2010] AISC/ANSI 341-10 – Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, M., Macedo, L., Marques, M. and Castro, J. M. [2016] “Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 45(1), 129–148. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. [2007] ASCE/SEI 41-06 – Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Azad, S. K., Topkaya, C. and Astaneh-Asl, A. [2017] “Seismic behaviour of concentrically braced frames designed to AISC341 and EC8 provisions,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 133, 383–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad, S. K., Topkaya, C. and Bybordiani, M. [2018] “Dynamic buckling of braces in concentrically braced frames,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 47(3), 613–633. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, R. G., Wenger, W. A. and Popov, E. P. [1980] “Inelastic buckling of steel struts under cyclic load reversals,” Report no. UCB/EERC-80/40. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, M., Brandonisio, G., Marino, E. M., Mele, E. and De Luca, A. [2017] “Ω* method: an alternative to eurocode 8 procedure for seismic design of X-CBFs,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 134, 135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., Toreno, M., Grande, E., Mele, E. and De Luca, A. [2012] “Seismic design of concentric braced frames,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 78, 22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. [2004] EN 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1, General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. [2005a] EN 1993-1-1eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. [2005b] EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 3, Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. [2010] EN 1990 Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Constanzo, S., D’Aniello, M. and Landolfo, R. [2017] “Seismic design criteria for Chevron CBFs: proposals for the next EC8 (part-2),” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 138, 17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSA. [2009] CSA-S16-09 – Design of Steel Structures, Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, A., Grande, E. and Mele, E. [2006] “Implications of code provisions in the seismic design of concentric braced frames,” STESSA 2006: 5th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Del Gobbo, G. M., Williams, M. S. and Blakeborough, A. [2018] “Seismic performance assessment of eurocode 8-compliant concentric braced frame buildings using P-58,” Engineering Structures 155, 192–208. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghazouli, A. Y. [2003] “Seismic design procedures for concentrically braced frames,” Structures & Buildings 156(SB4), 381–394.
   Google Scholar
• Elghazouli, A. Y. [2010] “Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8, 65–89. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fardie, M. N., Carvalho, E., Elnashai, A., Faccioli, E., Pinto, P. and Plumier, A. [2005] Designers’ Guide to EN 1998-1 and 1998-5. Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistant Structures, Thomas Telford, London.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. [2000] FEMA-350 – Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Giugliano, M. T., Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. [2011] “Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 40, 1455–1474. doi: 10.1002/eqe.1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggins, J. M., Broderick, B. M., Elghazouli, A. Y. and Lucas, A. S. [2005] “Experimental cyclic response of cold-formed hollow steel bracing members,” Engineering Structures 27(7), 977–989. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, P.-C., Lehman, D. E. and Roeder, C. W. [2013] “A model to simulate special concentrically braced frames beyond fracture,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42, 183–200. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamanci, E. and Lignos, D. G. [2014] “Computational approach for collapse assessment of concentrically braced frames in seismic regions,” Journal of Structural Engineering 140(8), A4014019. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, L. and Castro, J. M. [2017] “SelEQ: an advanced ground motion record selection and scaling framework,” Advances in Engineering Software 114, 32–47. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaga-Chuquitaype, C. and Elghazouli, A. Y. [2011] “Consideration of seismic demand in the design of braced frames,” Steel Construction 4(2), 65–72. doi: 10.1002/stco.201110010.
   Google Scholar
• Naqash, M. T., Mahmood, K. and Khoso, S. [2014] “An overview on the seismic design of braced frames,” American Journal of Civil Engineering 2(2), 41–47. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15.
   Google Scholar
• Nip, A. K. H., Gardner, L. and Elghazouli, A. Y. [2013] “Ultimate behaviour of steel braces under cyclic loading,” Structures and Buildings 166(SB5), 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• PEER. [2006] OpenSees: Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Shaback, B. and Brown, T. [2003] “Behaviour of square hollow structural steel braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 30(4), 745–753. doi: 10.1139/l03-028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A., Castro, J. M. and Monteiro, R. [2018] X-CBF design solutions and ground motion record sets. (available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327212019).
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R. [2002] “Inelastic response of steel bracing members,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 58(5–8), 665–701. doi: 10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00104-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R. [2007] “Innovative braced frame steel structures for seismic resistance,” ANIDIS 2007: XII Italian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Pisa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R. and Elghazouli, A. Y. [2011] “Steel concentrically braced frames: comparison between Canadian and European seismic design provisions,” Eurosteel 2011: 6th European Conference on Steel and Composite Structures, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Uriz, P., Filuppou, F. C. and Mahin, S. A. [2008] “Model for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces,” Journal of Structural Engineering 134(4), 619–628. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(619).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, A., Castro, J. M. and Elghazouli, A. Y. [2009] “Improved seismic design procedure for steel moment frames,” STESSA 2009: 6th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar