A Computational Strategy for Eurocode 8-Compliant Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Structures by Seismic Envelopes

References

• Alfano, G., Marmo, F. and Rosati, L. [2007] “An unconditionally convergent algorithm for the evaluation of the ultimate limit state of RC sections subject to axial force and biaxial bending,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 72, 924–963. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annigeri, S., Mittal, A. K. and Jain, A. K. [1996] “Uncoupled frequency ratio in asymmetric buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25(8), 871–881. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199608)25:8<871::AID-EQE593>3.0.CO;2-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, D., Constantinou, M. C. and Whittaker, A. S. [2014] “An equivalent accidental eccentricity to account for the effects of torsional ground motion on structures,” Engineering Structures 69, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, D. and Jain, S. [2004] “Seismic analysis of asymmetric buildings with flexible floor diaphragms,” Journal of Structural Engineering 130(8), 1169–1176. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1169).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. F., Teng, J. G. and Chan, S. L. [2001] “Design of biaxially loaded short composite columns of arbitrary section,” Journal of Structural Engineering 127(6), 678–685. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:6(678).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. [2007] “b. Elastic response spectrum: A historical note,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36(1), 3–12. doi:10.1002/eqe.609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. [2007a] Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• De La Llera, J. and Chopra, A. [1995] “Estimation of accidental torsion effects for seismic design of buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering 121(1), 102–114. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:1(102).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Llera, J. C. and Chopra, A. K. [1994a] “b. Evaluation of code accidental–torsion provisions from building records,” Journal of Structural Engineering 120(2), 597–616. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:2(597).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Llera, J. C. and Chopra, A. K. [1994b] “Using accidental eccentricity in code-specified static and dynamic analyses of buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 23(9), 947–967. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Llera, J. C. and Chopra, A. K. [1994a] “Accidental torsion in buildings due to base rotational excitation,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 23(9), 1003–1021. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian, A. [1981] “A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of mdf systems,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 9(5), 419–435. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290090503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurocode 2. [1992] CEN EN 1992–1–1 Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Community, Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8. [1998] CEN EN 1998–1 Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part I: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Community, Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, R. and Chopra, A. [1993] “Seismic code analysis of buildings without locating centers of rigidity,” Journal of Structural Engineering - ASCE 119(10), 3039–3055. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:10(3039).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, J. J. and López, O. A. [2002] “Response to three-component seismic motion of arbitrary direction,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31(1), 55–77. doi:10.1002/eqe.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICBO. [1991]. “Uniform building code,” International Conference of Building Officials, Pasadena, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ile, N. and Frau, A. [2017] “Use of response envelopes for seismic margin assessment of reinforced concrete walls and slabs,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 314, 238–250. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimiyan, S., Kashan, A. and Karimiyan, M. [2014] “Progressive collapse vulnerability in 6-Story RC symmetric and asymmetric buildings under earthquake loads,” Earthquake and Structures 6(5), 473–494. doi:10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. H., Chopra, A. K. and De La Llera, J. C. [2001] “Accidental torsion in buildings: analysis versus earthquake motions,” Journal of Structural Engineering 127(5), 475–481. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(475).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, O., Hernández, J., Bonilla, R. and Fernández, A. [2006] “Response spectra for multicomponent structural analysis,” Earthquake Spectra 22(1), 85–113. doi:10.1193/1.2162898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmo, F. and Rosati, L. [2012] “Analytical integration of elasto-plastic uniaxial constitutive laws over arbitrary sections,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 91, 990–1022. doi:10.1002/nme.v91.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmo, F. and Rosati, L. [2013] “The fiber-free approach in the evaluation of the tangent stiffness matrix for elastoplastic uniaxial constitutive laws,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 94, 868–894. doi:10.1002/nme.v94.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmo, F., Serpieri, R. and Rosati, L. [2011] “Ultimate strength analysis of prestressed reinforced concrete sections under axial force and biaxial bending,” Computers & Structures 89, 91–108. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menun, C. [2003] “A response–spectrum–based envelope for Mohr’s circle,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32(12), 1917–1935. doi:10.1002/eqe.308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menun, C. [2004] “An envelope for Mohr’s circle in seismically excited three-dimensional structures,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33(9), 981–998. doi:10.1002/eqe.388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian, A. [1998] “A replacement for the 30%, 40%, and SRSS rules for multicomponent seismic analysis,” Earthquake Spectra 14(1), 153–163. doi:10.1193/1.1585993.
   Google Scholar
• Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian, A. [2000a] “Envelopes for seismic response vectors. – I: theory,” Journal of Structural Engineering 126(4), 467–473. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(467).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian, A. [2000b] “Envelopes for seismic response vectors. – II: application,” Journal of Structural Engineering 126(4), 474–481. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(474).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NBCC. [2005] National Research Council of Canada – National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, N. M. [1969]. “Torsion in symmetrical buildings,” Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp. 19–32. (3).
   Google Scholar
• NTC. [2008] CSLLPP – DMLLPP 14/ 01/2008Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni – Standard building rules, Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici, Roma, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• NTC. [2018] CSLLPP – DMLLPP 17/ 01/2018Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni – Standard building rules, Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici, Roma, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• NZS 1170.5. [2004] Standards New Zealand NZS 1170.5 – Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions, Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Selna, L. G. and Lawder, J. H. [1977]. “Biaxial inelastic frame seismic behavior,” Symposium Publication on American Concrete Institute SP-53, Symposium on Reinforced Concrete Structures in Seismic Zones, American Concrete Institute Annual Convention, San Francisco, California, pp. 439–461.
   Google Scholar
• Sessa, S., Marmo, F. and Rosati, L. [2015] “Effective use of seismic response envelopes for reinforced concrete structures,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44(14), 2401–2423. doi:10.1002/eqe.2587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sessa, S., Marmo, F., Rosati, L., Leonetti, L., Garcea, G. and Casciaro, R. [2018] “Evaluation of the capacity surfaces of reinforced concrete sections: eurocode versus a plasticity-based approach,” Meccanica 53(6), 1493–1512. doi:10.1007/s11012-017-0791-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeby, W. and Der Kiureghian, A. [1985] “Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290130103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso, W. K. and Dempsey, K. M. [1980] “Seismic torsional provisions for dynamic eccentricity,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 8, 275–289. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290080307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valoroso, N., Marmo, F. and Sessa, S. [2014] “Limit state analysis of reinforced shear walls,” Engineering Structures 61, 127–139. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valoroso, N., Marmo, F. and Sessa, S. [2015] “A novel shell element for nonlinear pushover analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13(8), 2367–2388. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9724-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. L., Der Kiureghian, A. and Bayo, E. P. [1981] “A replacement for the srss method in seismic analysis,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 9(2), 187–192. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290090207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar