Guidance on Conducting 2D Linear Viscoelastic Site Response Analysis Using a Finite Element Code

References

• Abaqus, 6.13 © 2002–2018 Dassault Systèmes - All rights reserved
   Google Scholar
• Andreotti, G. and Lai, C. G. [2017a] “A nonlinear constitutive model for beam elements with cyclic degradation and damage assessment for advanced dynamic analyses of geotechnical problems. Part I: theoretical formulation,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15(7), 2785–2801. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0090-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotti, G. and Lai, C. G. [2017b] “A nonlinear constitutive model for beam elements with cyclic degradation and damage assessment for advanced dynamic analyses of geotechnical problems. Part II: validation and application to a dynamic soil-structure interaction problem,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15(7), 2803–2825. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0091-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, P.-Y. and Bouchon, M. [1980a] “The seismic response of sediment- filled valleys. Part 1. The case of incident SH waves,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70(4), 1263–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, P.-Y. and Bouchon, M. [1980b] “The seismic response of sediment- filled valleys. Part 2. The case of incident P and SV waves,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70(5), 1921–1941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, P.-Y. and Bouchon, M. [1985] “The two-dimensional resonance of sediment-filled valleys,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 75(2), 519–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe, K.-J. and Wilson, E. L. [1976] Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, L. F. [2000] NOAH: Users Manual, Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez-García, F. J. and Faccioli, E. [2000] “Complex site effects and building codes: making the leap,” Journal of Seismology 4(1), 23–40. doi:10.1023/A:1009830201929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. [1995] Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A. and Park, D. [2002] “Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(2002), 611–624. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00042-8.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I. [1992] User’s Manual for Shake91, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, California.
   Google Scholar
• Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC. [2012] Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC 3dfast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua: User’s Manual, Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklamanos, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M. and Dorfmann, L. [2015] “Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 69, 207–219. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaklamanos, J., Bradley, B. A., Thompson, E. M. and Baise, L. G. [2013] “Critical parameters affecting bias and variability in site-response analysis using Kik-net downhole array data,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(3), 1733–1749. doi:10.1785/0120120166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, A. L. and Lovell, D. F. [1927] “Internal friction in solids,” Physics Review 30, 948. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.30.948.
   Google Scholar
• Kottke, A. R. and Rathje, E. M. [2008] Technical Manual for Strata, PEER Report 2008/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. [1996] Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlemeyer, R. L. and Lysmer., J. [1973] “Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems,” Journal of the Soil Dynamics Division 99, 421–427.
   Google Scholar
• Luzi, L., Pacor, F. and Puglia, R. [2017] Italian Accelerometric Archive V2.3, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Dipartimento della protezione Civile Nazionale, Italy. doi:10.13127/ITACA.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R. L. [1969] “Finite dynamic model for infinite media,” Proceedings of the ASCE – Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 95(EM4), 859–876.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. H. [2006]. “Absorbing boundary conditions for seismic analysis in ABAQUS,” ABAQUS Users’ Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 359–376.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. H. [2014] “Towards a complete framework for seismic analysis in Abaqus,” Proceedings of the ICE - Engineering and Computational Mechanics 167(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rayleigh, J. W. S. and Lindsay, R. B. [1945] The Theory of Sound, 1st American Ed, Dover Publications, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H. B. [1972]. “Shake: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites,” Report EERC 72–12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., Martin, P. P. and Lysmer, J. [1975]. “The generation and dissipation of pore water pressures during soil liquefaction,” NSF Report PB-252 648, University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., Afshari, K. and Goulet, C. A. [2017] “Non-ergodic site response in seismic hazard analysis,” Earthquake Spectra 33, 1385–1414. doi:10.1193/081716EQS135M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., Afshari, K. and Hashash, Y. M. A. [2014]. “Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction,” PEER Report No. 2014/16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UC Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. M., Baise, L. G., Tanaka, Y. and Kayen, R. E. [2012] “A taxonomy of site response complexity,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 41, 32–43. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidale, J. and Helmberger, D. V. [1988] “Elastic finite difference of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 78(1), 122–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpini, C. and Douglas, J. [2019] “An accessible approach for the site response analysis of quasi-horizontal layered deposits,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17(3), 1163–1183. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0488-4 (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. P. [1988] Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis in Time Domain, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. P. [1994] Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Zienkiewicz, O. C., Bicanic, N. and Shen, F. Q. [1989] “Earthquake input definition and the transmitting boundary conditions,” in: Advances in Computational Nonlinear Mechanics. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), vol 300, ed. I. S. Doltsinis (Springer, Vienna), pp. 109–138.
   Google Scholar