A New Method for Generating Aftershock Records Using Artificial Neural Network

References

• Abdelnaby, A. E. 2012. Multiple earthquake effects on degrading reinforced concrete structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelnaby, A. E. 2016. Fragility curves for RC frames subjected to Tohoku mainshockaftershocks sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2016.1264328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahzadeh, G. R., A. Mohammadgholipour, and E. Omranian. 2018. Seismic evaluation of steel moment frames under mainshock-aftershock sequence designed by elastic design and PBPD methods. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2017.1387198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 7-10. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. (ASCE 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineering, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., and V. K. Gupta. 2010. Scaling of response spectrum and duration for aftershocks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30 (8): 724–35. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., and D. Frangopol. 2015. Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties. Engineering Structures 83: 198–208. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures FEMA 440. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R. 2012. Mainshock–Aftershock ground motion features and their influence in building’s seismic response. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16 (5): 719–37. doi:10.1080/13632469.2012.663154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., M. V. Marin, and A. T. Gilmore. 2014. Effect of seismic sequences in reinforced concrete frame buildings located in soft-soil sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 63: 56–68. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodrati Amiri, G., A. Asadi, and A. Bagheri. 2012. New method for generation of artificial earthquake accelerograms using wavelet packet transform and generalized regression neural networks. Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction On: Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology 27 (4): 65–74. (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Goda, K., and C. A. Taylor. 2012. Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41 (15): 2311–30. doi:10.1002/eqe.2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, F., and A. E. Abdelnaby. 2017. Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 92: 706–25. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., and H. Ebrahimian. 2016. Seismic risk assessment considering cumulative damage due to aftershocks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. doi:10.1002/eqe.2792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, N., and J. W. Baker. 2008. Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (5): 2231–43. doi:10.1785/0120070208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, G. 1994. A friendly guide to wavelets. Boston: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Kiani, J., and M. Khanmohammadi. 2015. New approach for selection of real input ground motion records for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Journal of Earthquake Engineering 19 (4): 592–623. doi:10.1080/13632469.2014.997901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, J., and S. Pezeshk. 2017. Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. doi:10.1002/eqe.2928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov, N. A. 1957. The representation of continuous functions of many variables by superposition of continuous functions of one variable and addition. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 114 (5): 953–56.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, K. 1944. A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 2 (2): 164–68. doi:10.1090/qam/10666.
   Google Scholar
• Lew, M., F. Naeim, S. C. Huang, H. K. Lam, and L. D. Carpenter. 2000. Geotechnical and geological effects of the 21 September 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 9 (2): 89–106. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(200005)9:2<89::AID-TAL146>3.0.CO;2-7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2007. Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36 (3): 405–27. doi:10.1002/eqe.667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D. W. 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11 (2): 431–41. doi:10.1137/0111030.
   Google Scholar
• Misiti, M., Y. Misiti, G. Oppenheim, and J.-M. Poggi. 2000. Wavelet toolbox user’s guide. Natick, Massachusetts: The Math Works Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nazari, N., J. W. De Lindt, and Y. Li. 2015. Quantifying changes in structural design needed to account for aftershock hazard. Journal of Structural Engineering 141. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland, D. E. 1993. An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis: 3rd Edition. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaou, A. S. 1998. A GIS Platform for Earthquake Risk Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis., State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Omranian, E., A. E. Abdelnaby, and G. R. Abdollahzadeh. 2018. Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC skew bridges subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 114: 186–97. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, M., A. B. Liel, and N. Luco. 2015. Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44 (3): 419–39. doi:10.1002/eqe.2478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoettler, M. J., J. I. Restrepo, G. Guerrini, D. E. Duck, and F. Carrea. 2015. A full-scale, single-column bridge bent tested by shake-table excitation. PEER Report No. 2015/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Shahroozi, M., A. Bahar, and Sazchini. 2011. “Reconstruction of earthquake records with extraction of wavelet coefficients. 06th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Song, R., Y. Li, and J. W. Van de Lindt 2016. Loss estimation of steel buildings to earthquake mainshock – Aftershock sequences. Structural Safety 61: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, R., and D. D’Ayala. 1999. Damage assessment and analysis of the 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake. Structural Engineering International 9 (3): 229–33. doi:10.2749/101686699780482014.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, L. E., and L. A. Montejo. 2005. “Generation of artificial earthquakes via the wavelet transform”. International Journal of Solids and Structures 42: 5905–19. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (3): 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. 2000. Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1193.
   Google Scholar
• Veelenturf, L. P. J. 1995. Analysis and applications of artificial neural networks. UK: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A., V. V. Bertero, J. Wright, and M. Higashino. 1997. Earthquake damage distribution. Retrieved from http://nisee.berkeley.edu/kobe/damage.html.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao-Hui, Y., L. Shuang, L. Da-Gang, and J. Tao. 2018. Collapse capacity of inelastic single-degree-of-freedom systems subjected to mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1453417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, C., W. Weiping, D. Ji, and S. Li. 2015. The influences of aftershocks on the constant damage inelastic displacement ratio. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 79: 186–189. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar