Effect of Time-Varying Delay on Stability of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation with Multiple Experimental Substructures

References

• Ahmadizadeh, M., G. Mosqueda, and A. M. Reinhorn. 2008. Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (1): 21–42. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly, A. M., and R. E. Christenson. 2008. Fast hybrid testing of three controlled large-scale MR dampers for a three story nonlinear building. Inaugural International Conference of the Engineering Mechanics Institute (EM08), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, C. 1986. Limitations to algorithm solvability: Galois methods and models of computation. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, October, 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S., L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan. 1994. Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 15: 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carrion, J. E., and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2007. Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing. In Newmark structural engineering laboratory, ed. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 54–108. IL, USA. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/3629.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, Y., K. Kazemibidokhti, and J. M. Ricles. 2013. Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo-hydraulic actuator systems for real-time hybrid simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (11): 1697–715. doi: 10.1002/eqe.v42.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2008. Stability analysis of SDOF real-time hybrid testing systems with explicit integration algorithms and actuator delay. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (4): 597–613. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2010. Tracking error-based servohydraulic actuator adaptive compensation for real-time hybrid simulation. Journal of Structural Engineering 136 (4): 432–40. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., J. M. Ricles, T. L. Karavasilis, Y. Chae, and R. Sause. 2012. Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading. Engineering Structures 35: 71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., J. M. Ricles, R. Sause, and R. Christenson. 2010. Experimental evaluation of an adaptive inverse compensation technique for real-time simulation of a large-scale magneto-rheological fluid damper. Smart Materials and Structures 19 (2): 025017. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/2/025017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. C., and K. C. Tsai. 2013. Dual compensation strategy for real-time hybrid testing. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combescure, D., and P. Pegon. 1997. α-Operator splitting time integration technique for pseudodynamic testing error propagation analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16 (7–8): 427–43. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00017-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridman, E., and U. Shaked. 2003. Delay-dependent stability and H∞ control: constant and time-varying delays. International Journal of Control 76 (1): 48–60. doi: 10.1080/0020717021000049151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, K. 2000. An integral inequality in the stability problem of time-delay systems. In Decision and Control, 2000. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on, Vol.3, 2805–10. Sydney, Australia: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, K., J. Chen, and V. L. Kharitonov. 2003. Stability of time-delay systems. USA: Birkhauser Boston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q. L. 2005. Absolute stability of time-delay systems with sector-bounded nonlinearity. Automatica 41 (12): 2171–76. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, T., M. Inoue, T. Konno, and Y. Namita. 1999. Real time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 28 (10): 1121–41. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, T., and T. Konno. 2001. A new method for compensating actuator delay in real–time hybrid experiments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 359 (1786): 1893–909. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2001.0878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., C. Chen, T. Guo, and M. H. Chen. 2019. Stability analysis of real-time hybrid simulation for time-varying actuator delay using the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 145 (1): 04018124. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., T. Guo, C. Chen, and M. Chen. 2018. Restoring force correction based on online discrete tangent stiffness estimation method for real-time hybrid simulation. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 17 (4): 805–20. doi: 10.1007/s11803-018-0477-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. J., R. Christenson, B. Phillips, and J. B. F. Spencer. 2012. Geographically distributed real-time hybrid simulation of MR dampers for seismic hazard mitigation. 20th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference, Chicago, IL, 382–93.
   Google Scholar
• Krasovskii, N. N. 1963. Stability of motion. San Francisco: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyapunov, A. M. 1992. The general problem of the stability of motion. International Journal of Control 55 (3): 531–34. doi: 10.1080/00207179208934253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghareh, A., S. Dyke, S. Rabieniaharatbar, and A. Prakash. 2017. Predictive stability indicator: a novel approach to configuring a real-time hybrid simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (1): 95–116. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahin, S. A., and P. S. B. Shing. 1985. Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing. Journal of Structural Engineering 111 (7): 1482–503. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1482).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, H. F. 2013. Study on several stability problems of linear retarded systems. Hefei, China: University of Science and Technology of China.
   Google Scholar
• Mercan, O. 2007. Analytical and experimental studies on large scale, real-time pseudodynamic testing. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA. 91
   Google Scholar
• Mercan, O., and J. M. Ricles. 2007. Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (11): 1523–43. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercan, O., and J. M. Ricles. 2008. Stability analysis for real-time pseudodynamic and hybrid pseudodynamic testing with multiple sources of delay. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (10): 1269–93. doi: 10.1002/eqe.v37:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, H. E. 1967. Hydraulic control systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mosqueda, G., B. Stojadinovic, and S. A. Mahin. 2007. Real-time error monitoring for hybrid simulation. Part I: Methodology and experimental verification. Journal of Structural Engineering 133 (8): 1100–08. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1100).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima, M., T. Kaminosomo, M. Ishida, and K. Ando. 1990. Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test. Proc., 4th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA, Vol. 2, 515–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nakashima, M., H. Kato, and E. Takaoka. 1992. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 21 (1): 79–92. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H. 2002. Stability criterion for neutral differential systems with mixed multiple time-varying delay arguments. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 59 (5): 401–12. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(01)00420-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, P., J. W. Ko, and C. Jeong. 2011. Reciprocally convex approach to stability of systems with time-varying delays. Automatica 47 (1): 235–38. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poley, R. 2005. DSP control of electro-hydraulic servo actuators. Texas Instruments Application Report, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Razumikin, B. S. 1956. On the stability of systems with delay. Prikladnava Matematikal Mekhanika 20 (4): 500–12.
   Google Scholar
• Seuret, A., F. Gouaisbaut, and E. Fridman. 2013. Stability of systems with fast-varying delay using improved Wirtinger’s inequality. In Decision and Control (CDC), 2013 IEEE 52nd Annual Conference on, December, 946–51. Florence, Italy: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, H. 2009. New delay-dependent stability criteria for systems with interval delay. Automatica 45 (3): 744–49. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2008.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thewalt, C., and M. Roman. 1994. Performance parameters for pseudodynamic tests. Journal of Structural Engineering 120 (9): 2768–81. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:9(2768).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. I., J. Sieber, S. A. Neild, D. J. Wagg, and B. Krauskopf. 2005. Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equation models. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (15): 1817–32. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., and Y. He. 2008. Robust control of time delay system - Free-weighting matrices approach. Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W. J., T. Guo, and C. Chen. 2017. Localized evaluation of actuator tracking for real-time hybrid simulation using frequency-domain indices. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 62 (5): 631–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., B. Basu, and S. R. Nielsen. 2016 September. Real-time hybrid simulation technique for performance evaluation of full-scale sloshing dampers in wind turbines. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 753 (8): 082021. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., J. T. Wang, F. Jin, F. D. Chi, and Y. Gui. 2015. Stability analysis of MDOF real time dynamic hybrid testing systems using the discrete time root locus technique. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (2): 221–41. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar