A Hybrid Seismic Design Method for Steel Irregular Space Moment Resisting Frames

References

• Anagnostopoulos, S. A., M. T. Kyrkos, and K. G. Stathopoulos. 2015. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: Critical review and state of the art. Earthquakes and Structures 8 (2): 305–77. doi: 10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 41-13. 2014. Seismic evaluation of retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, M., A. Ghersi, E. Marino, and P. P. Rossi. 2002. Effects of in elevation irregularity on the elastic seismic response of in-plan asymmetric buildings. Proceedings of the third European workshop on the seismic behavior of irregular and complex structures, September 17–18. Florence, Italy: CD ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgnia, Y., and V. V. Bertero. 2004. Earthquake engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. J. 2005. Ruaumoko-3D - A program for inelastic dynamic analysis. Technical Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., N. T. K. Lam, and P. Mendis. 2000. The bifurcation behavior of vertically irregular buildings in low seismicity regions. WCEE: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30 – February 4. Paper No. 1625.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. 2007. Dynamics of structures. Berkeley: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., and J. M. Nau. 2003. Seismic design aspects of vertically irregular reinforced concrete building. Earthquake Spectra 19 (3): 455–77. doi: 10.1193/1.1595650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Llera, J. C., and A. K. Chopra. 1995. Understanding the inelastic seismic behavior of asymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24: 549–72. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290240407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, M., and B. Pintucchi. 2008. A review of research on seismic behavior of irregular building structures since 2002. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 6: 285–308. doi: 10.1007/s10518-007-9052-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, X. N., and A. M. Chandler. 1995. Seismic torsional response and design procedures for a class of setback frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24: 761–77. doi: 10.1002/()1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S. C., and P. K. Das. 2002. Inelastic seismic response of code-designed reinforced concrete asymmetric buildings with strength degradation. Engineering Structures 24: 1295–314. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00062-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurocode 3, EC3. 2005. Design of steel structures, part 1. 1: General rules for buildings, European prestandard ENV 1993- 1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8, EC8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Standard EN 1998-1, Stage 51 Draft. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Fadden, M. F. 2013. Cyclic bending behavior of hollow structural sections and their application in seismic moment frame systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P58. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. ATC. Applied Technology Council, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. 1999. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. Report No 132, John A Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Humar, J. L., and E. W. Wright. 1977. Earthquake response of steel framed multistory buildings with setbacks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 5 (1): 15–39. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290050103.
   Google Scholar
• International Building Code, IBC. 2012. International code council, Inc. USA: ICC.
   Google Scholar
• Karavasilis, T. L., N. Bazeos, and D. E. Beskos. 2006. A hybrid force/displacement seismic design method for plane steel frames. In F. M. Mazzolani and A. Wada, editors. STESSA: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Area, August 14–17, 39–44. Yokohama, Japan:Taylor & Fransis.
   Google Scholar
• Karavasilis, T. L., N. Bazeos, and D. E. Beskos. 2008. Seismic response of plane steel MRF with setbacks: Estimation of inelastic deformation demands. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 64 (6): 644–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karavasilis, T. L., N. Bazeos, and Beskos, DE. 2009. Estimation of seismic inelastic deformation demands in plane steel MRF with vertical mass irregularities. Engineering Structures 30 (11): 3265–75. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, L., A. Silva, and J. M. Castro. 2019. A more rational selection of the behavior factor for seismic design according to Eurocode 8. Engineering Structures 188: 69–86. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., R. Ramasco, and R. Realfonzo. 2002. Seismic behavior of irregular in elevation plane frames. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London, UK, September 9–13. Paper no. 219.
   Google Scholar
• MATLAB. 2018. The language of technical computing. Natick, MA: The Mathworks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolani, F. M., and V. Piluso. 1996. Theory and design of seismic resistant steel frames. FN & SPON an Imprint of Chapman & Hall, London, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, PEER. 2009. Strong ground motion database. http://peer.berkeley.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Direct displacement-based design. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• SAP2000. 2018. Static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Skalomenos, K. A., G. D. Hatzigeorgiou, and D. E. Beskos. 2015a. Application of the hybrid force/displacement (HFD) seismic design method to composite steel/concrete plane frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 115: 179–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalomenos, K. A., G. D. Hatzigeorgiou, and D. E. Beskos. 2015b. Modelling level selection for seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube/moment resisting frames by using fragility curves. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44 (2): 199–220. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalomenos, K. A., G. D. Hatzigeorgiou, and D. E. Beskos. 2015c. Seismic behavior of composite steel/concrete MRFs: Deformation assessment and behavior factors. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (12): 3871–96. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9794-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Structural Engineers Association of California, SEAOC. 1995. Vision 2000 – A framework for performance based earthquake engineering. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC).
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R., and L. Poncet. 2005. Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 131: 1363–75. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1363).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzimas, A. S. 2013. A new hybrid force/displacement method for seismic design of space steel structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Tzimas, A. S., T. L. Karavasilis, N. Bazeos, and D. E. Beskos. 2013. A hybrid force/displacement seismic design method for steel building frames. Engineering Structures 56: 1452–63. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzimas, A. S., T. L. Karavasilis, N. Bazeos, and D. E. Beskos. 2017. Extension of the hybrid force/displacement (HFD) seismic design method to 3D steel moment-resisting frame buildings. Engineering Structures 147: 486–504. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valmundsson, E. V., and J. M. Nau. 1997. Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 123 (1): 30–41. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(30).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, A. A., N. Bazeos, and D. E. Beskos. 2008. Seismic design of irregular space steel frames using advanced methods of analysis. Steel and Composite Structures 8: 53–83. doi: 10.12989/scs.2008.8.1.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xilin, L., S. Ningfen, and Y. Zhou. 2011. Nonlinear time history analysis of a super-tall building with setbacks in elevation. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 22: 593–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembaty, Z., and M. De Stefano, editors. 2016. Seismic behavior and design of irregular and complex civil structures II. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar