Quantifying Uncertainties in Ground Motion-Macroseismic Intensity Conversion Equations. A Probabilistic Relationship for Western China

References

• A, N., R. M. D. L. Na, G. Ge, and H. Jin. 2017. Seismic hazard field investigation and intensity analysis of M5.8 earthquake Alashan left county, Inner Mongolia. Recent Developments in World Seismology 467 (11): 15–21. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, N. A., and J. J. Bommer. 2005. Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Earthque Spectra 21 (2): 603–07. doi: 10.1193/1.1899158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, N. A., and R. R. Youngs. 1992. A stable algorithm for regression analysis using the random effects model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82: 505–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, D. A., J. E. Hurtado, and D. A. Bedoya-Ruíz. 2012. Prediction of modified Mercalli intensity from PGA, PGV, moment magnitude, and epicentral distance using several nonlinear statistical algorithms. Journal of Seismology 16 (3): 489–511. doi: 10.1007/s10950-012-9291-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys, N. N. 1974. The correlation of intensity with ground motion. Proc. of 14th Conference of European Seismological Communication, Trieste, Italy, Vol. 1, 335–41.
   Google Scholar
• Arioglu, E., B. Arioglu, and C. Girgin. 2001. Assessment of the eastern Marmara earthquake in terms of acceleration values. Beton Prefabrikasyon 57: 5–15. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G. M., and S. I. Kaka. 2007. Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the central United States and California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97 (2): 497–510. doi: 10.1785/0120060154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G. M., and E. Sonley. 2000. Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90 (2): 537–44. doi: 10.1785/0119990118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal, M., and A. Askan. 2014. Relationships between felt intensity and recorded ground-motion parameters for Turkey. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104 (1): 484–96. doi: 10.1785/0120130093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatwright, J., K. Thywissen, and L. Seekins. 2001. Correlation of ground motion and intensity for the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91 (4): 739–52. doi: 10.1785/0119990049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., M. W. Stirling, G. H. Mcverry, and M. Gerstenberger. 2012. Consideration and propagation of epistemic uncertainties in New Zealand probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 102 (4): 1554–68. doi: 10.1785/0120110257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprio, M., B. Tarigan, C. B. Worden, S. Wiemer, and D. J. Wald. 2015. Ground motion to intensity conversion equations (GMICEs): A global relationship and evaluation of regional dependency. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105 (3): 1–21. doi: 10.1785/0120140286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q. 2002a. The earthquake cases in China (1992-1994). Beijing, China: Seismological press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q. 2002b. The earthquake cases in China (1995-1996). Beijing, China: Seismological press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q. 2002c. The earthquake cases in China (1997-1999). Beijing, China: Seismological press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 (5): 1583–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangkua, D. T., and C. H. Cramer. 2011. Felt intensity versus instrumental ground motion: A difference between California and Eastern North America? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101 (4): 1847–58. doi: 10.1785/0120100133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, P. N. 2003. Instrumental measures of earthquake intensity in New Zealand. Proc. of 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, February.
   Google Scholar
• Du, K., B. Ding, H. Luo, and J. Sun. 2019. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and macroseismic intensity in Western China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 109 (1): 284–97. doi: 10.1785/0120180216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, P. S., D. J. Wald, K. S. Jaiswal, T. I. Allen, K. D. Marano, A. J. Hotovec, M. G. Hearne, and J. M. Fee. 2009. Prompt assessment of global earthquakes for response (PAGER): A system for rapidly determining the impact of global earthquakes worldwide. U.S. Geololgy Survey Open-File Report 2009-1131: 15.
   Google Scholar
• ERDCEA (Emergency and rescue department of China Earthquake Administration). 2010. A compilation of earthquake disaster loss assessment in mainland China (2001~2005). Beijing, China: Seismological press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Faccioli, E., and C. Cauzzi. 2006. Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations. Proc. of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, September 3-8, Paper No. 569, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Faenza, L., and A. Michelini. 2010. Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophysical Journal International 180 (3): 1138–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama-Garcia, A., and A. Gómez-Bernal. 2008. Relationships between instrumental ground motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in Guerrero, Mexico. 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. G., and A. G. Bernal. 2008. Relationships between instrumental ground motion parameters, and modified mercalli intensity in guerrero, Mexico. The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 13-17.
   Google Scholar
• Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter. 1942. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 32 (3): 163–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter. 1956. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (Second Paper). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 46 (2): 105–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, J. 1956. A comparison of earthquake accelerations with intensity rating. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 46 (4): 317–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, X., Y. Luo, B. Chen, J. Hao, and C. Liang. 2018. The characteristics of earthquake damage in Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its inspiration to earthquake prevention and disaster reduction in Guizhou. Earthquake Research in Sichuan 166 (1): 31–35. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Kaka, S. I., and G. M. Atkinson. 2004. Relationships between instrumental ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (5): 1728–36. doi: 10.1785/012003228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamer, Y., E. Abdulhamitbilal, M. B. Demircioglu, M. Erdik, U. Hancilar, K. Sesetyan, C. Yenidogan, and A. C. Zulfikar. 2009. Earthquake Loss Estimation Routine ELER v.1.0 user manual. Istanbul, Turkey: Bogazici University, Department of Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Krinitzsky, E. L., and F. K. Chang. 1988. Intensity-related earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 4: 425–35.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., X. Chang, J. Luo, J. Chen, J. Sun, W. Hu, and M. Tan. 2017. Damage Investigation of the Hutubi Ms 6.2 Earthquake on December 8, 2016. Tech Earthquake Disaster Prevention 12 (1): 14–23. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Linkimer, L. 2008. Relationship between peak ground acceleration and modified Mercalli intensity in Costa Rica. Rev Geol Am Cent 38: 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, M. W., J. F. Sauter, and H. C. Shah. 1980. A technical note on PGA-intensity relations with applications to damage estimation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70 (2): 631–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, R. K. 1995. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85 (5): 1275–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, R. K. 2007. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (3): 329–38. doi: 10.1002/eqe.765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFDCEA (Monitoring and forecasting department of China Earthquake Administration). 2001. A compilation of earthquake disaster loss assessment in mainland China (1996~2000). Beijing, China: Seismological press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, A., L. Faenza, V. Luciani, and L. Malagnini. 2008. ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismological Research Letters 79 (5): 688–97. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.79.5.688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. R., and L. J. O’Brien. 1977. The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67 (3): 877–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musson, R. M. W., G. Grüntal, and M. Stucchi. 2009. The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. Journal of Seismology 14: 413–28. doi: 10.1007/s10950-009-9172-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pailoplee, S. 2012. Relationship between modified Mercalli intensity and peak ground acceleration in Myanmar. Natural Science 4 (08): 624–30. doi: 10.4236/ns.2012.428082.
   Google Scholar
• Panjamani, A., K. Bajaj, S. S. R. Moustafa, and N. S. N. Alarifi. 2016. Relationship between intensity and recorded ground-motion and spectral parameters for the Himalayan region. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106 (4): 1672–89. doi: 10.1785/0120150342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panza, G. F., F. Vaccari, and R. Cazzaro. 1997. Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion parameters. Annals of Geofisc 15: 1371–82.
   Google Scholar
• Saman, Y. S., H. H. Tsang, and T. K. L. Nelson. 2011. Conversion between peak ground motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity values. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15: 1138–55. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2011.565861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souriau, A. 2006. Quantifying felt events: A joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. Journal of Seismology 10 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.1007/s10950-006-2843-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodulidis, N., and B. Papazachos. 1992. Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 11 (7): 387–402. doi: 10.1016/0267-7261(92)90003-V.
   Google Scholar
• Trendafiloski, G., M. Wyss, and P. Rosset. 2011. Loss estimation module in the second generation software QLARM. In Human casualties in earthquakes, advances in natural and technological hazards research, ed. R. Spence, E. So, and C. Scawthorn, Vol. 29, 95–104. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (1): 139–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tselentis, G., and L. Danciu. 2008. Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and engineering ground-motion parameters in Greece. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (4): 1863–75. doi: 10.1785/0120070172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, and H. Kanamori. 1999a. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthq. Spectra 15: 557–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, H. Kanamori, C. W. Scrivner, and C. B. Worden. 1999b. ‘Trinet ShakeMaps’: Rapid generation of instrumental ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15: 537–56. doi: 10.1193/1.1586057.
   Google Scholar
• Worden, C. B., M. C. Gerstenberger, D. A. Rhoades, and D. J. Wald. 2012. Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 102 (1): 204–21. doi: 10.1785/0120110156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. M., T. L. Teng, T. C. Shin, and N. C. Hsiao. 2003. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93: 386–96. doi: 10.1785/0120020097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar