Influence of Riverbed Scour on the Performance of Bridges Subjected to Lateral Seismic Loads

References

• Alipour, A., and B. Shafei 2012. Performance assessment of highway bridges under earthquake and scour effects. Proceedings, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Alipour, A., B. Shafei, and M. Shinozuka. 2013. Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: Scour and earthquake. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering 18 (5): 362–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI standard 7-16. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. 1996a. Improved seismic design criteria for california bridges: Provisional recommendations, ATC-32. Redwood City, California, U.S.A: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. 1996b. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40. Redwood City, California, U.S.A.: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, FEMA-440. Redwood City, California, U.S.A.: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., and G. G. Prasad. 2013. Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 9 (9): 952–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caltrans. 2011. California amendments to AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 4th ed. Sacramento, California, U.S.A.: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans. 2013. Seismic design criteria (SDC) - Version1.7. Sacramento, California, U.S.A.: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans. 2015. Bridge design practice. 4th ed. Sacramento, California, U.S.A: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonnari, S., M. Morici, F. Dezi, F. Gara, and G. Leoni. 2017. Soil-structure interaction effects in single bridge piers founded on inclined. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 92: 52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, Y. H., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2002. Flexural strength and ductility of extended pile-shafts – II: Experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering 128: 595–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. C., Y. C. Tsai, D. W. Chang, Y. C. Sung, W. Y. Liao, J. F. Chai, H. H. Hung, K. Y. Liu, H. M. Wu, S. R. Qi, et al. 2009. Seismic assessment and retrofit manual for highway bridges. Taiwan, R.O.C: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE).
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 1999. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, pacific earthquake engineering research center. Berkeley, California, U.S.A: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Chotesuwan, A., H. Mutsuyoshi, and T. Maki. 2012. Seismic behavior of bridges with pier and foundation strengthening PsD tests and analytical study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41: 279–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. 1999. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28: 979–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. A. (1998). “Development and use of capacity spectrum method,” Proceedings, 6th US NCEE Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. A. 2004. Review of the development of the capacity spectrum method. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 41 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X., M. Badroddin, and Z. Chen. 2017. Applied method for seismic assessment of scoured bridges: A review with case studies. Earthquake and Structures 13 (5): 497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z., A. Ye, and L. Fan. 2010. Effects of riverbed scour on seismic performance of high-rise pile cap foundation. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 9 (4): 533–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. C., Y. H. Chai, R. W. Boulanger, and I. M. Idriss. 2004. Inelastic seismic response of extended pile-shaft-supported bridge structures. Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1057–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, Z., and K. Amanat. 2014. Riverbed scouring effect in bridge pile foundation during earthquake. Advances in Soil Dynamics and Foundation Engineering ASCE GSP 240: 343–52.
   Google Scholar
• Klinga, J. V., and A. Alipour. 2015. Assessment of structural integrity of bridges under extreme scour conditions. Engineering Structures 82: 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., and G. C. Lee. 2013a. Bridge pier failure probabilities under combined hazard effects of scour, truck and earthquake. Part I: Occurrence probabilities. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 12 (2): 229–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., and G. C. Lee. 2013b. Bridge pier failure probabilities under combined hazard effects of scour, truck and earthquake. Part II: Failure probabilities. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 12 (2): 241–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, K. W., Y. Muto, and J. Gitomarsono. 2018. Reliability analysis of river bridge against scours and earthquakes. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 32 (3): 04018017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgreen, C. C. 2010. Damping ratio for laterally loaded pile group in fine grained soils and improved soils, Master thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8): 1804–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Mylona, E. K. V., A. G. Sextos, and G. E. Mylonakis. 2017. Rotational seismic excitation effects on CIDH pile-supported bridge piers. Engineering Structures 138: 181–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. 2015. NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. FEMA P-1050. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. W., and J. M. Murchison 1983. An evaluation of P-Y relationships in sands. Research Report PRAC 82-41-1, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Paulay, T., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York, U.S.A: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, G. G., and S. Banerjee. 2013. The impact of flood-induced scour on seismic fragility characteristics of bridges,”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17 (9): 803–28.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York, U.S.A: Wiley- Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, B. D., R. Park, and M. J. N. Priestley. 1982. Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI Journal 79: 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, Y., A. Alipour, and A. Ye. 2018. Selection of input motion for seismic analysis of scoured pile-supported bridge with simplified models. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 144 (8): 04018099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, S. T., C. Y. Wang, and W. H. Huang. 2015. Earthquake damage potential and critical scour depth of bridges exposed to flood and seismic hazards under lateral seismic loads. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 14 (4): 579–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. C., K. Y. Liu, C. H. Chen, and K. C. Chang. 2015. Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of scoured bridge pier with pile foundation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (6): 849–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. W., A. Ye, Z. G. He, and Y. Shang. 2016. Quasi-static cyclic testing of elevated RC pile-cap foundation for bridge structures. Journal of Bridge Engineering 21 (2): 04015042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., J. E. Padgett, and L. Dueñas-Osorio. 2014. Risk-consistent calibration of load factors for the design of reinforced concrete bridges under the combined effects of earthquake and scour hazards. Engineering Structures 79: 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and J. E. Padgett. 2014. Influence of scour effects on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges. Engineering Structures 76: 202–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., W. Song, and T. Li 2012. Combined fragility surface analysis of earthquake and scour hazards for bridge, Proceedings, 15th World Conference on. Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Y. Shang, and A. Ye. 2016. Dynamic interaction between bridge pier and it’s large pile foundation considering earthquake and scour depths. Advances in Structural Engineering 19 (9): 1390–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar