Low-Damage Rocking Precast Concrete Cladding Panels: Design Approach and Experimental Validation

References

• ACI 318-11. 2011. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute Committee.
   Google Scholar
• ACI 533R-93 (American Concrete Institute Committee). 1993. Guide for precast concrete wall panels. USA.
   Google Scholar
• AISC 341-10.2010. Seismic provisions for steel buildings. Chicagi, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10). Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. 2014. Seismic performance of precast concrete cladding systems. PhD diss., University of Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A., and H. Ferner. 2017. Damage to non‐structural elements in the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (2): 187–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.187-193.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A., A. Palermo, and S. Pampanin. 2011. Facade damage assessment of multi-storey buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 44 (4): 368–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.368-376.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, R. T. 1990. Fastener design manual. 1228. NASA, scientific and technical information division.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., R. P. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, and G. A. MacRae. 2009. Seismic loss estimation for efficient decision making. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 42 (2): 96–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.2.96-110.
   Google Scholar
• CCANZ. 1992. Architectural concrete cladding. New Zealand: Technical Manual.TM-01. Porirua: Cement and Concrete Association of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• CERC.2012. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. Accessed November 10, 2019. https://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/vwluResources/FinalReportVol3Print/$file/Final_Report_Volume_3_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. M. 1995. Literature review on seismic performance of building cladding systems. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, M. D. 2014. Physical Characteristics of new houses 2013. Accessed November 20, 2019. https://www.branz.co.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B., F. Biondini, G. Toniolo, and M. L. Tornaghi. 2017. Experimental investigation on the influence of silicone sealant on the seismic behaviour of precast façades. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 15 (4): 1771–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0045-y.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B. A. 2015. Seismic performance of precast structures with dissipative cladding panel connections. PhD diss., Politecnico Di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Dhakal, R. P. 2010. Damage to non-structural components and contents in 2010 Darfield earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 43 (4): 404–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.4.404-411.
   Google Scholar
• Dhakal, R. P., G. MacRae, and K. Hogg. 2011. Performance of ceilings in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 44 (4): 377–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.377-387.
   Google Scholar
• EC8. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN/TC 250.
   Google Scholar
• English, B.2015. Budget speech. Accessed November 12, 2019. https://treasury.govt.nz/resources/budget-speech-1
   Google Scholar
• FEMA.2007. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and non-structural components. FEMA 461. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/15207.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA E-74. 2011. Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage - A Practical guide. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P-750. 2009. NEHRP recommended seismic provisions. Washinton, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Folić, R. J. 1991. Classification of damage and its causes as applied to precast concrete buildings. Materials and Structures 24 (4): 276–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472083.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. P. 2010. Seismic performance assessment and probabilistic repair cost analysis of precast concrete cladding systems for multistory buildings. PhD diss., UC Berkely.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T., E. Pantolli, K. McMullin, M. Hildebrand, and G. Underwood. 2014. Seismic drift compatibility of architectural precast concrete panels and connections: A design guide for engineers. Reporte Técnico No. SSRP-14/16, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Khakurel, S., R. P. Dhakal, T. Z. Yeow, and S. K. Saha. 2020. Performance group weighting factors for 1 rapid seismic loss estimation of buildings of 2 different usage. Earthquake Spectra. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019901311.
   Google Scholar
• Khakurel, S., T. Z. Yeow, F. Chen, Z. Wang, S. K. Saha, and R. P. Dhakal. 2019. Development of cladding contribution functions for seismic loss estimation. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 52 (1): 23–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.1.23-43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, N. T. K., and E. Gad.2002. An innovative approach to the seismic assessment of non-structural components in buildings. Australian Earthquake Engineering Society (AEES) Annual Seminar. Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maness, G. L. 1991. Preventing wall deterioration. Journal of Property Management 56 (5): 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, W. E., L. Megget, and A. Charleson. 2007. Architectural design for earthquake: A guide to the design of non-structural elements. New Zealand: Society for Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• MBIE. 2004. Building code B1-structure. New Zealand: Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• MBIE.2017. Economic benefits of code compliant non-structural elements in new buildings. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Accessed November 15, 2019. https://www.mbie.govt.nz/assets/decf694d37/economics-relating-to-the-seismic-performance-of-non-structural-elements-v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MBIE and EQC. 2017. Secondary Structural and Non-structural Elements-C10. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and Earthquake Commission. Accessed December 18, 2019. www.building.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, K. M., M. Ortiz, L. Patel, S. Yarra, T. Kishimoto, C. Stewart, and B. Steed. 2012. Response of exterior precast concrete cladding panels in NEES-TIPS/NEESGC/E-Defense tests on a full scale 5-story building. Structures Congress 2012: 1305–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.117.
   Google Scholar
• Negro, P., and M. L. Tornaghi. 2017. Seismic response of precast structures with vertical cladding panels: The SAFECLADDING experimental campaign. Engineering Structures 132: 205–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NZS 1170.5 - Supp1 (Standards New Zealand).2004. Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions Commentary.
   Google Scholar
• NZS 1170.5 (Standards New Zealand).2004. Structural design actions, part 5: Earthquake actions.
   Google Scholar
• NZS 3404 (Standards New Zealand).1997. Steel Structures Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Page, I. 2009. Cladding types in New Zealand. BUILD: 55-56.
   Google Scholar
• Pantoli, E. 2016. Seismic behavior of architectural precast concrete cladding panels and connections. PhD diss., UC San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• PCI.2007. Architectural precast concrete. 3rd ed. Chicago, Illinois: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rihal, S. S. 1989. Earthquake resistance and behavior of APCC and connections. Architectural Precast Concrete Cladding - Its Contribution to Lateral Resistance of Buildings, Chicago, IL., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. L., R. J. Beers, and D. L. Thomas. 1989. Seismic behavior of architectural precast concrete cladding. Architectural Precast Concrete Cladding – Its Contribution to Lateral Resistance of Buildings, Chicago, IL., USA.
   Google Scholar
• SESOC.2019. Interim design guidance: Design of conventional structural systems following the Canterbury Earthquakes 10. Version no.10. New Zealand: Structural Engineering Society New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Taghavi, S., and E. Miranda.2003. Response assessment of non-structural building elements. Report 2003/05, University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Toniolo, G., and B. Dal Lago. 2017. Conceptual design and full‐scale experimentation of cladding panel connection systems of precast buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (14): 2565–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villaverde, R. 1997. Seismic design of secondary structures: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering 123 (8): 1011–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. L. 1987. Cladding performance on a full-scale test frame. Earthquake Spectra 3.1: 119–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585423.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A., I. Noy, and M. Parker. 2016. The Canterbury rebuild five years on from the Christchurch earthquake. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin 79 (3): 3.
   Google Scholar