A Critical Review of Methods for Determining the Damage States for the In-plane Fragility of Masonry Infill Walls

References

• Badillo-Almaraz, H., A. S. Whittaker, and A. M. Reinhorn. 2007. Seismic fragility of suspended ceiling systems. Earthquake Spectra 23 (1): 21–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2357626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, G. 1958. Statistical estimates and transformed beta‐variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G., D. Bolognini, and A. Penna. 2004. Seismic performance of masonry-infilled RC frames: Benefits of slight reinforcement. In Proceedings of 6th National Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 253–76. Guimaraes, Portugal: SISMICA.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2015. Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls. Earthquakes and Structures 9 (1): 257–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiozzi, A., and E. Miranda. 2017. Fragility functions for masonry infill walls with in-plane loading. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (15): 2831–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutu, A., H. Sakata, Y. Yamazaki, and T. Shindo. 2016. In-plane behavior of timber frames with masonry infills under static cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 142 (2): 04015140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA 461. 2007. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P-58. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1: Methodology. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• GB 50011-2010. 2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• GB/T 24335-2009. 2009. Classification of earthquake damage to buildings and special structures. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• GB/T 50129-2011. 2011. Standard for test method of basic mechanics properties of masonry. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, W. T. 2000. A vision for a complete performance-based earthquake engineering system. In 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: WCEE.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinidis, D., and F. Nikfar. 2015. Seismic response of sliding equipment and contents in base-isolated buildings subjected to broadband ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (6): 865–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2490.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors, H. W. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (318): 399–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2283970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, A. B., P. B. Shing, M. P. Schuller, and J. L. Noland. 1996. Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 122 (3): 228–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro, P., and A. Colombo. 1997. Irregularities induced by nonstructural masonry panels in framed buildings. Engineering Structures 19 (7): 576–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00115-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulay, T., and M. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Petrone, C., L. Di Sarno, G. Magliulo, and E. Cosenza. 2017. Numerical modelling and fragility assessment of typical freestanding building contents. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4): 1609–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0034-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K., R. Kennedy, and R. Bachman. 2007. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 471–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol, S., A. Benavant‐Climent, M. Rodriguez, and J. Smith‐Pardo. 2008. “Masonry infill walls: An effective alternative for seismic strengthening of low‐rise reinforced concrete building structures.” In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China: WCEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sassun, K., T. Sullivan, P. Morandi, and D. Cardone. 2016. Characterising the in-plane seismic performance of infill masonry. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 49: 100–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.49.1.98-115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavi, S., and E. Miranda. 2003. Response assessment of nonstructural building elements. Report No 2003/05. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Verderame, G. M., F. De Luca, P. Ricci, and G. Manfredi. 2011. Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 40 (8): 925–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, P., B. Sun, and H. Zhang. 2014. Seismic damage to RC frame teaching buildings in Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. China Civil Engineering Journal 47: 24–28 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar