Seismic Risk Assessment for Masonry Buildings Typologies from L’Aquila 2009 Earthquake Damage Data

References

• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1999. E 2026-99 Standard Guide for the Estimation of Building Damageability in Earthquakes, West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Angeletti, P., A. Baratta, A. Bernardini, C. Cecotti, A. Cherubini, R. Colozza, L. Decanini, P. Diotallevi, G. Di Pasquale, M. Dolce, et al. 2002. Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica degli edifici, con particolare riferimento a quelli strategici per la protezione civile. Rapporto finale Dipartimento Protezione Civile – Ufficio Servizio Sismico Nazionale, Roma. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• ATC-13, Applied technology council. 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, FEMA contract no. EMW-C-0912, Redwood City, CA, 1985
   Google Scholar
• Augenti, N., and F. Parisi. 2010. Learning from construction failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 24 (6): 536–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, C., A. Bernardini, R. Colozza, S. Coppari, L. Corazza, M. Della Bella, G. Di Pasquale, M. Dolce, A. Goretti, A. Martinelli, et al., 2007. Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures. In: A. Pinto and F. Taucer (eds) Translation from Italian: Goretti A, Rota M, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 22868 EN-2007
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2015. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barazza, F., S. Grimaz, P. Malisan, E. Del Pin, and F. Meroni, 2009. Stima speditiva degli scenari di danno sismico atteso per gli edifici in muratura mediante l’utilizzo di curve di Probit. Proceedings of XIII Convegno Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. (Bologna, Italy, June 28–July 2 2009). In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, S., T. Rossetto, and I. Ioannou, 2018. Derivation of empirical fragility functions from the 2009 Aquila earthquake. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, pp 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Bothara, J. K., J. B. Mander, R. P. Dhakal, R. K. Khare, and M. M. Maniyar, 2007. Seismic performance and financial risk of masonry houses. ISET journal of earthquake technology, Paper No. 493, Vol. 44, No. 3-4, Sept.-Dec. 2007, pp. 421–44
   Google Scholar
• Braga, F., D. Dolce, and D. Liberatore, 1982. Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K- 76 scale. 7th European conference on earthquake engineering. Settembre 1982, Atene; CNR-PFG. 503, Roma
   Google Scholar
• Braga, F., R. Gigliotti, G. Monti, F. Morelli, C. Nuti, W. Salvatore, and I. Vanzi. 2015. Post-seismic assessment of existing constructions: Evaluation of the shakemaps for identifying exclusion zones in Emilia. Earthq. Struct 8 (1): 37–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, F., V. Manfredi, A. Masi, A. Salvatori, and M. Vona. 2011. Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull. Earthq. Eng 9 (1): 307–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brando, G., G. De Matteis, and E. Spacone. 2017. Predictive model for the seismic vulnerability assessment of small historic centres: Application to the inner Abruzzi Region in Italy. Engineering Structures 153: 81–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34: 693–714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNI, Centro Studi Consiglio Nazionale Ingegneri, 2014. I costi dei terremoti in Italia. Roma: Centro Studi Consiglio Nazionale Ingegneri. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, M., M. Laterza, and D. Diaz Fuentes. 2020. Simplified seismic analyses of ancient churches in Matera’s landscape. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (1): 119–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1511000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato, M., R. Gigliotti, and R. Laguardia. 2019a. Seismic isolation for protecting historical buildings: A case study. Frontiers in Built Environment 5 (July): 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00087.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Amato, M., R. Laguardia, G. Di Trocchio, M. Coltellacci, and R. Gigliotti, 2019b. Risk analysis of existing building heritage through damage assessment after L’Aquila earthquake 2009. Proceedings of XVIII Convegno Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. (Ascoli Piceno, Italy, 15-19 September 2019)
   Google Scholar
• De Martino, G., M. Di Ludovico, A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017. Estimation of repair costs for RC and masonry residential buildings based on damage data collected by post-earthquake visual inspection. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4): 1681–706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0039-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., E. Criber, and G. Brando. 2016. Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10: 120–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, and V. Corlito. 2019. Predictive model for seismic vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull. Earthq. Eng 17 (9): 4909–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., G. De Martino, M. Di Ludovico, G. Manfredi, A. Prota, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2016. Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4): 1425–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0026-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., G. De Martino, M. Di Ludovico, G. Manfredi, A. Prota, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2019. Empirical fragility curves for masonry buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (11): 6301–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00683-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017a. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part I—‘“light damage”’ reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2): 667–92. Springer Netherlands. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017b. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part II—‘heavy damage’ reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2): 693–729. Springer Netherlands. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pasquale, G., and A. Goretti, 2001. Functional and economic vulnerability of residential buildings affected by recent Italian earthquakes. Proceedings of X Convegno Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. (Potenza-Matera, Italy, 9-13 September 2001). In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., E. Speranza, F. Giordano, B. Borzi, F. Bocchi, C. Conte, D. I. Meo, A. Faravelli, and M. Pascale. 2019. Observed damage database of past Italian earthquakes: The Da. DO WebGIS. Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata 60 (2): 141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., and G. Manfredi, 2015. Libro bianco sulla ricostruzione privata fuori dai centri storici nei comuni colpiti dal sisma dell’Abruzzo del 6 Aprile 2009. Rome (IT). In Italian
   Google Scholar
• DPC. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, 2015. Piattaforma Da.D.O. Database Danno Osservato - Manuale utente. Manuale realizzato da EUCENTRE nell’ambito della Convenzione DPC-RELUIS 2015 - Progetto Operativo S3.10 (“Sviluppo e Gestione di una Piattaforma WebGIS per il Monitoraggio degli interventi su edifici privati di cui all’art.2, comma 1 lettera c) delle Ordinanze in attuazione all’art. 11 del D.L. 28/ 04/2009”). Allegato S3.10_A. Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Formisano, A. 2017. Local and global scale seismic analyses of historical masonry compounds in San Pio delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy). Natural Hazard 86 (S2): 465–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2694-1.
   Google Scholar
• Formisano, A., and A. Marzo. 2017. Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building. Computers & Structures 180: 13–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, D. D., P. A. Baquedano Julià, M. D’Amato, and M. Laterza. 2019. Preliminary seismic damage assessment of mexican churches after September 2017 earthquakes. International Journal of Architectural Heritage: 1–21. Published on line. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1628323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebelein, J., M. Barnard, H. Burton, M. Cochran, and C. Haselton, 2017. Considerations for a framework of resilient structural design for earthquakes. 2017 Seaoc convention proceedings, pp 1–16
   Google Scholar
• Grunthal, G., 1998. European Macroseismic Scale. European Seismological Commission (ESC)
   Google Scholar
• Indirli, M., L. A. S. Kouris, A. Formisano, R. P. Borg, and F. M. Mazzolani. 2013. Seismic damage assessment of unreinforced masonry structures after the Abruzzo 2009 earthquake: The case study of the historical centers of L’Aquila and Castelvecchio Subequo. Int. J. Archit. Herit 7 (5): 536–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2011.654050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INGV. National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology. 2007. Available at: http://esse1-gis.mi.ingv.it/
   Google Scholar
• INGV. National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology. 2016. Accessed April 2020. Available at: http://shakemap.rm.ingv.it/shake/index.html
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT. Italian National Statitstics Insitute. 2011. 15° Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni. PopulationHosingCensus. Accessed April 2020. http://dati-censimentopopolazione.istat.it/Index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., S. Cattari, and D. Ottonelli, 2015. Derivazione di curve di fragilità empiriche per classi tipologiche rappresentative del costruito Aquilano sulla base dei dati del danno dell’evento sismico del 2009. Research Project DPC-ReLUIS 2015. In italian
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 2: Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2): 395–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguardia, R., M. D’Amato, G. Di Trocchio, M. Coltellacci, and R. Gigliotti, 2019. A statistical analysis on the application of seismic isolation on existing buildings without local interventions. Proceedings of XVIII Convegno Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. (Ascoli Piceno, Italy, 15-19 Settembre 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, S., M. D’Amato, L. Ramos, M. Laterza, and P. B. Lourenço. 2019. Simplified formulation for estimating the main frequencies of ancient masonry churches. Frontiers in Built Environment 5: 18. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00018.
   Google Scholar
• Luzi, L., R. Puglia, E. Russo, and M. Clara D’amico. 2016. Engineering strong motion database, version 1.0. Seismol. Research Letters 87: 987–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150278.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, A., L. Faenza, V. Lauciani, and L. Malagnini. 2008. ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismological Research Letters 79: 688–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.5.688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerial Decree n. 58, D.M. 2 February 2017. Linee Guida per la Classificazione del Rischio Sismico delle Costruzioni‐58/2017. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, F., Laguardia, R., Faggella, M., Piscini, A., Gigliotti, R., and Salvatore, W. (2018). Ground motions and scaling techniques for 3D performance based seismic assessment of an industrial steel structure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0244-1
   Google Scholar
• NTC, 2018. D.M. 17. 01.18Aggiornamento delle ‘Norme Tecniche per le costruzioni.’ Rome: Italian Ministry of Infrastructure. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Ottonelli, D., S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino, 2015. A seismic loss assessment procedure for masonry buildings. In Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015 (pp. 447–458)
   Google Scholar
• Penna, A., C. Calderini, L. Sorrentino, C. F. Carocci, E. Cescatti, R. Sisti, A. Borri, C. Modena, and A. Prota. 2019. Damage to churches in the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4.
   Google Scholar
• Picchi, C., 2016. Evaluation and reduction of seismic risk of existing buildings. Doctoral Thesis. “Sapienza” University of Rome. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A., J. L. Beck, and R. Shaikhutdinov. 2004. Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1239–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1809129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeian, S., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2012. A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (11): 1549–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., F. de Luca, and G. M. Verderame. 2011. 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: Reinforced concrete building performance. Bull. Earthq. Eng 9 (1): 285–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, F., M. Faggella, R. Gigliotti, M. Zucconi, and B. Ferracuti. 2018. Comparative seismic loss analysis of an existing non-ductile RC building based on element fragility functions proposals. Engineering Structures 177: 707–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., D. D’Ayala, F. Gori, Persio R., Han J., Novelli V., Wilkinson S. M., Alexander D., Hill M., Stephens S., Kontoe S., Elia G., Verrucci E., Vicini A., Shelley W., Foulser-Piggott R. 2014. The value of multiple earthquake missions: The EEFIT L’Aquila earthquake experience. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12: 277–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9588-y.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., I. Ioannou, and D. N. Grant. 2013. Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability functions: Compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia
   Google Scholar
• Rosti, A., M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2018. Damage classification and derivation of damage probability matrices from L’Aquila (2009) post-earthquake survey data. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 3687–720. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0352-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti, A., M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2020a. Empirical fragility curves for Italian URM buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti, A., M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2020b. Influence of seismic input characterisation on empirical damage probability matrices for the 2009 L’Aquila event. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 128: 105870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rota, M., A. Penna, and C. L. Strobbia. 2008. Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28 (10): 933–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabetta, F., A. Goretti, and A. Lucantoni, 1998. Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France, September 6 –11
   Google Scholar
• Sisti, R., M. Di Ludovico, A. Borri, and A. Prota. 2018. Damage assessment and the effectiveness of prevention: The response of ordinary unreinforced masonry buildings in Norcia during the Central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0448-z.
   Google Scholar
• Snoj, J., and M. Dolšek. 2020. Pushover‐based seismic risk assessment and loss estimation of masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 49 (6): 567–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3254.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, H. Kanamori, C. W. Scrivner, and C. B. Worden. 1999. TriNet ‘ShakeMaps’: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in Southern California. Earthq Spectra 15 (3): 537-555
   Google Scholar
• Zuccaro, G., and F. Cacace, 2015. Seismic vulnerability assessment based on typological characteristics. The first level procedure “SAVE”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 69, pp. 262–69, 0267-7261, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Zucconi, M., F. Ferlito, and L. Sorrentino. 2018. Simplified survey form of unreinforced masonry buildings calibrated on data from the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16.7 (2018)): 2877–911.
   Google Scholar
• Zucconi, M., L. Sorrentino, and R. Ferlito. 2017. Principal component analysis for a seismic usability model of unreinforced masonry buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 96: 64–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucconi, M., R. Ferlito, and L. Sorrentino. 2020. Validation and extension of a statistical usability model for unreinforced masonry buildings with different ground motion intensity measures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18: 767–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00669-2.
   Google Scholar