Numerical Modeling for Nonlinear Static Pushover and Response History Analyses of Dhajji-Dewari Structures

References

• Ahmad, N., Q. Ali, and M. Umar. 2012. Simplified engineering tools for seismic analysis and design of traditional Dhajji-Dewari structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (5): 1503–34. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9364-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, E., Y. Didem, A. Turer, B. Erdil, U. Akyuz, and N. S. Guchan. 2010. Testing and seismic capacity evaluation of a typical traditional ottoman timber frame. Advanced Materials Research 133-134: 629–34. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.629.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Q. 2006. Unreinforced brick masonry residential building. In Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), World Housing Encyclopedia, Report No. 112.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Q., N. Ahmad, M. Ashraf, M. Rashid, and T. Schacher. 2017. Shake table tests on single-story Dhajji Dewari traditional buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–14. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2017.1338789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, Q., and T. Schacher 2008. Timber reinforced stone masonry in Northern Pakistan in the context of the post earthquake reconstruction efforts. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Seismic Risk and Rehabilitation. Azores, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Q., T. Schacher, M. Ashraf, B. Alam, A. Naeem, N. Ahmad, and M. Umar. 2012. In-plane behavior of the Dhajji-Dewari structural system (Wooden Braced Frame with Masonry Infill). Earthquake Spectra 28 (3): 835–58. doi: 10.1193/1.4000051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCP-SP. 2007. Building Code of Pakistan - Seismic Provisions 2007. Islamabad: Ministry of Housing and Works.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., M. Lopes, and R. Bento. 2005. Seismic evaluation of old masonry buildings. Part I: Method description and application to a case-study. Engineering Structures 27 (14): 2024–35. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, R. K., K. S. Chawla, and T. P. Singh. 2007 Traditional earthquake resistant houses. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://www.devalt.org/newsletter/may01/of_10.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dogangun, A., O. Tuluk, R. Livaoglu, and R. Acar. 2006. Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis 13 (6): 981–96. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutu, A., H. Sakata, Y. Yamazaki, and T. Shindo. 2016. In-Plane behavior of timber frames with masonry infills under static cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 142 (2): 04015140. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. G., M. J. Teixeira, A. Duţu, F. A. Branco, and A. M. Gonçalves. 2014. Experimental evaluation and numerical modelling of timber-framed walls. Experimental Techniques 38 (4): 45–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00820.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, E., Y. Sieffert, H. Algusab, S. Grange, P. Garnier, and L. Daudeville. 2018. Numerical analysis on seismic resistance of a two-story timber-framed structure with stone and earth infill. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1479804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guchan, N. S. 2007. Observations on earthquake resistance of traditional timber-framed houses in Turkey. Building and Environment 42 (2): 840–51. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülkan, P., and R. Langenbach. 2004. The earthquake resistance of traditional timber and masonry dwellings in Turkey. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. no. 2297.
   Google Scholar
• Javed, M., A. Naeem, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2006. Behavior of masonry structures during the Kashmir 2005 earthquake. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland (CD-ROM) paper no. 1077.
   Google Scholar
• Kheyroddin, A., M. Gholhaki, and G. Pachideh. 2019. Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete moment frames retrofitted with steel braces using IDA and pushover methods in the near-fault field. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering 7 (1): 159–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kouris, L., S. Alexandros, and A. J. Kappos. 2012. Detailed and simplified non-linear models for timber-framed masonry structures. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13 (1): 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2011.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouris, L. A. S., and A. J. Kappos. 2014. A practice-oriented model for pushover analysis of a class of timber-framed masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 75: 489–506. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbach, R. 2007. From ‘Opus Craticium’ to the ‘Chicago Frame’: Earthquake-resistant traditional construction. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1 (1): 19–59. doi: 10.1080/15583050601125998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbach, R. 2008. Resisting earth’s forces: Typologies of timber buildings in history. Structural Engineering International 18 (2): 137–40. doi: 10.2749/101686608784218806.
   Google Scholar
• Langenbach, R., S. Kelley, P. Sparks, K. Rowell, M. Hammer, O. J. Julien, and E. Avrami. 2010. Preserving Haiti’s gingerbread houses: 2010 earthquake mission report, 84.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8): 1804–26. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovski, M., H. G. L. Prion, and E. Karacabeyli. 2003. Shake table tests on single-storey braced timber frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 30 (6): 1089–100. doi: 10.1139/l03-060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, N., D. D’Ayala, and T. Descamps. 2016. Structural characterization and numerical modeling of historic Quincha walls. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3): 300–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggieri, N., G. Tampone, and R. Zinno. 2015. In-Plane versus out-of-plane “Behavior” of an Italian timber frames system – The Borbone constructive system: Historical analysis and experimental evaluation. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (6): 696–711. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2015.1041189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadati, S., and S.-G. Behnam. 2014. Numerical modeling of links behavior in eccentric bracings with dual vertical links. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering 1 (1). pp. 14-20.
   Google Scholar
• Sheheryar, N. A hmad, M. Ashraf, and Q. Ali. 2018. Numerical Modelling of Timber Braced Frame Masonry Structures (Dhajji Dewari). Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering2(2), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.29252/nmce.2.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., L. Tieying, Y. F. Chen, J. Chen, and Q. Yang. 2018. Full-scale tests on the horizontal hysteretic behavior of a single-span timber frame. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1547799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, R. 2007. Saving lives in earthquakes: Successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 5 (2): 139–251. doi: 10.1007/s10518-006-9028-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E., A. Zagkotsis, C. Repapis, and C. Zeris. 2007. Seismic behaviour of the historical structural system of the Island of Lefkada, Greece. Construction and Building Materials 21 (1): 225–36. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar