A Comprehensive Site Response and Site Classification of the Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya, Central Seismic Gap (CSG), India

References

• Allen, T. I., and D. J. Wald. 2009. On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (VS 30). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99: 935–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P., A. J. Boobalan, and H. S. Shaivan. 2019b. Establishing empirical correlation between sediment thickness and resonant frequency using HVSR for the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Current Science 117 (9): 1482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P., and K. Bajaj. 2020. Region-specific correlations between VS30 and time-averaged VSand SPT-N values at different depths for the Indo-GangeticBasin. Indian Geotechnical Journal 50 (3): 454–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P., K. N. Srilakshmi, K. Bajaj, S. S. Moustafa, and N. S. Al-Arifi. 2019a. Determination of seismic site classification of seismic recording stations in the Himalayan region using HVSR method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 116: 304–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P., and T. G. Sitharam. 2009. Spatial variability of the depth of weathered and engineering bedrock using multichannel analysis of surface wave method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 166: 409–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj, K., and P. Anbazhagan. 2019. Seismic site classification and correlation between VS and SPT-N for deep soil sites in Indo-Gangetic Basin. Journal of Applied Geophysics 163: 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, P. Y., and S. Participants, 2004. The SESAME project: An overview and main results, in: Proc. of 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August. pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Borcherdt, R. D. 1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 60: 29–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSSC 2003. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 450 and Building SeismicSafetyCouncil.
   Google Scholar
• Caielli, G., R. De Franco, V. Di Fiore, D. Albarello, S. Catalano, F. Pergalani, G. Cavuoto, M. Cercato, M. Compagnoni, and J. Facciorusso. 2019. Extensive surface geophysical prospecting for seismic microzonation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18: 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, W. B., S. L. Klemperer, J. F. Lawrence, and S. S. Rai. 2013. Characterizing the main himalayan thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 367: 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., V. Kumar, P. Choudhury, and R. B. S. Yadav. 2018. Site classification of Indian strong motion network using response spectra ratios. Journal of Seismology 22(2): 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fat-Helbary, R. E. S., K. O. El-Faragawy, and A. Hamed. 2019. Application of HVSR technique in the site effects estimation at the south of MarsaAlam city, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences 154: 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahalaut, V. K., and B. R. Arora. 2012. Segmentation of seismicity along the Himalayan Arc due to structural heterogeneities in the under-thrusting Indian plate and overriding Himalayan wedge. Episodes 35 (4): 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansser, A., 1964. Geology of the Himalayas.
   Google Scholar
• Gosar, A., and A. Lenart. 2010. Mapping the thickness of sediments in the ljubljana moor basin (Slovenia) using microtremors. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8: 501–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, G., S. G. Gokarn, and B. P. Singh. 1994. Thickness of the siwalik sediments in the mohand-ramnagar region using magnetotelluric studies. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 83: 217–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghshenas, E., P.-Y. Bard, N. Theodulidis, and S. W. Team. 2008. Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 6: 75–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harinarayan, N. H., and A. Kumar. 2018a. Seismic site classification of recording stations in tarai region of Uttarakhand, from multiple approaches. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 36: 1431–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harinarayan, N. H., and A. Kumar. 2018b. Determination of NEHRP site class of seismic recording stations in the Northwest Himalayas and its adjoining area using HVSR method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 175 (1): 89–107. doi: 10.1007/s00024-017-1696-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, B., and G. M. Atkinson. 2016. Applicability of the site fundamental frequency as a VS 30 proxy for central and eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106: 653–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IS 1893–2002 (Part 1)., 2002. Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 — General provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.1893.1.2002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jayangondaperumal, R., V. C. Thakur, V. Joevivek, P. S. Rao, and A. K. Gupta. 2018. Active Tectonics of Kumaun and Garhwal Himalaya. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konno, K., and T. Ohmachi. 1998. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88: 228–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavé, J., and J. P. Avouac. 2000. Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 105 (B3): 5735–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lermo, J., and F. J. Chávez-García. 1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 83 (5): 1574–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macau, A., B. Benjumea, A. Gabàs, F. Bellmunt, and S. Figueras. 2018. Geophysical measurements for site effects characterisation in the urban area of Girona, Spain. Near Surface Geophysics 16: 340–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A. K., J. J. Galiana-Merino, C. Lindholm, B. R. Arora, A. K. Mundepi, N. Rai, and N. Chauhan. 2011. Characterization of the sedimentary cover at the Himalayan foothills using active and passive seismic techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics 73: 196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A. K., and P. Kumar. 2018. Site characterisation in kangra valley (NW Himalaya, India) by inversion of H/V spectral ratio from ambient noise measurements and its validation by multichannel analysis of surface waves technique. Near Surface Geophysics 16 (3): 314–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A. K., V. Gupta, and V. C. Thakur. 2012. Macroseismic field observations of 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Natural Hazards 63: 589–603. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0170-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martorana, R., P. Capizzi, A. D’Alessandro, D. Luzio, P. Di Stefano, P. Renda, and G. Zarcone. 2018. contribution of HVSR measures for seismic microzonation studies. Annals of Geophysics 61 (2): 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. D., J. Xia, C. B. Park, and J. M. Ivanov. 1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves to map bedrock. The Leading Edge 18: 1392–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, H., A. Kumar, and R. Ramhmachhuani, 2012. Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, H., Y.-M. Wu, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, and B. Sharma. 2016. Evaluating the effects of ground motion parameters on response spectra in Uttarakhand Himalayas, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 9: 712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugnier, J. L., A. Gajurel, P. Huyghe, R. Jayangondaperumal, F. Jouanne, and B. Upreti. 2013. Structural interpretation of the great earthquakes of the last millennium in the central Himalaya. Earth-Science Reviews 127: 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundepi, A. K. 2013. Seismic microzonation study in doon valley, northwest Himalaya, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 81: 767–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundepi, A. K., J. J. Galiana-Merino, A. K. L. Asthana, and S. Rosa-Cintas. 2015. Soil characteristics in doon valley (north west Himalaya, India) by inversion of H/V spectral ratios from ambient noise measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77: 309–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Y., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports 30.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Y., and A. Saito 1983. Estimation of amplification characteristics of surface ground and PGA using strong motion records in Japan. In Proc. 17th JSCE Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Japan (pp. 25–28).
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, F., A. Gervasi, M. La Rocca, I. Guerra, and R. Scarpa. 2018. Site effects in the pollino region from the HVSR and polarization of seismic noise and earthquakessite effects in the pollino region from the HVSR and polarization of seismic noise and earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 108: 309–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, R. R., G. Kumar, M. L. Sharma, and S. C. Gupta. 2018. Estimation of bedrock depth for a part of Garhwal Himalayas using two different geophysical techniques. Geoscience Letters 5: 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, S. K., P. Sengupta, and J. R. Kayal. 2002. Determination of S-wave site response in the Garhwal Himalaya from the aftershock sequence of the 1999 Chamoli earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92: 1072–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, B., R. S. Jakka, and A. Kumar. 2016. Influence of local site conditions on strong ground motion characteristics at Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India. Natural Hazards 81: 1073–89. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-2120-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzera, F., G. Lombardo, S. Sicali, and S. D’Amico. 2017. Surface geology and morphologic effects on seismic site response: The study case of Lampedusa, Italy. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 98: 62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolai, S., 2012. Investigation of site response in urban areas by using earthquake data and seismic noise. New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP2) 3 mb, 38. doi:10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_CH14
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, V., C. C. Pant, and G. S. Darmwal. 2013. Geomorphological and seismological investigations in a part of western Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Geomorphology 193: 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudi, R., P. Roy, T. R. Martha, and K. V. Kumar. 2020. Estimation of earthquake local site effects using microtremor observations for the Garhwal–Kumaun Himalaya, India. Near Surface Geophysics. doi: 10.1002/nsg.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudi, R., P. Roy, T. R. Martha, K. V. Kumar, and P. R. Rao. 2018. Spatial potential analysis of earthquakes in the western Himalayas using b-value and thrust association. Journal of the Geological Society of India 91: 664–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission (RGNDWM), 2008. Ground water prospects mapping. National Remote Sensing Agency, Dept. od Space, Govt of India
   Google Scholar
• Rao, N. P., M. R. Kumar, T. Seshunarayana, A. K. Shukla, G. Suresh, Y. Pandey, R. D. Raju, S. D. Pimprikar, C. Das, and K. Gahalaut. 2011. Site amplification studies towards seismic microzonation in Jabalpur urban area, central India. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 36: 1247–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., M. Rodríguez, U. Iturrarán-Viveros, F. Luzón, M. Campillo, L. Margerin, A. García-Jerez, M. Suarez, M. A. Santoyo, and A. Rodriguez-Castellanos. 2011. A theory for microtremor H/V spectral ratio: application for a layered medium. Geophysical Journal International 186(1): 221–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu, M., B. Sharma, H. Mittal, and P. Chingtham. 2020. Analysis of the site effects in the North East region of India using the recorded strong ground motions from moderate earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1724214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyaseelan, R., J. P. Pappachen, and A. K. Mundepi. 2018. Micro-tremor induced gravity and seismic noise spectra in the Garhwal Himalaya and the adjoining regions. Journal of the Geological Society of India 91: 273–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seed, R. B., S. E. Dickenson, M. F. Reimer, J. D. Bray, N. Sitar, J. K. Mitchell, I. M. Idriss, R. E. Kayen, A. Kropp, L. F. Harder, et al., 1990. Preliminary report on the principal geotechnical aspects of the October 17, 1989 loma prieta earthquake. Report UCB/EERC-90/05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 137
   Google Scholar
• Seismotectonic atlas. 2000. Seismotectonic atlas of India. New Delhi: Geological Survey of India.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., D. Kumar, and A. Paul. 2020. Estimation of site response functions for the Kumaun-Garhwal region of Himalaya, India. Journal of Seismology. doi: 10.1007/s10950-020-09920-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, J., S. Chopra, and K. S. Roy. 2014. Estimation of source parameters, quality factor (QS), and site characteristics using accelerograms: Uttarakhand Himalaya region. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104: 360–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. P., A. Shukla, M. R. Kumar, and M. G. Thakkar. 2017. Characterizing surface geology, liquefaction potential, and maximum intensity in the kachchh seismic zone, Western India, through microtremor analysischaracterizing surface geology, liquefaction potential, and maximum intensity in the kachchh seismic zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 107: 1277–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. P., M. R. Kumar, A. Pandey, and K. S. Roy. 2019. Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of site response in the Arunachal Himalaya using ambient seismic noise and earthquake waveforms. Near Surface Geophysics 17: 427–45. doi: 10.1002/nsg.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. P., N. Annam, and S. Kumar. 2014. Assessment of predominant frequencies using ambient vibration in the kachchh region of western India: Implications for earthquake hazards. Natural Hazards 73 (3): 1291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharam, T. G., and L. Govindaraju. 2004. Geotechnical aspects and ground response studies in Bhuj earthquake, India. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 22: 439–55. doi: 10.1023/B:GEGE.0000025045.90576.d3.
   Google Scholar
• Steidl, J. H., A. G. Tumarkin, and R. J. Archuleta. 1996. What is a reference site? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86: 1733–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, V. L., S. N. Shrestha, and D. K. Maharjan. 2018. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of nepalprobabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Nepal. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 108: 3488–510. doi: 10.1785/0120180022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, W. C., F. Y. Yokel, M. Celebi, T. Hanks, and E. V. Leyendecker. 1987. Engineering aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico earthquake. NBS Building Science Series 165: 207.
   Google Scholar
• Valdiya, K. S. 1980. Geology of kumaun lesser Himalaya. Dehra Dun, India: Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., and T. I. Allen. 2007. Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97: 1379–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walling, M. Y., W. K. Mohanty, S. K. Nath, S. Mitra, and A. John. 2009. Microtremor survey in Talchir, India to ascertain its basin characteristics in terms of predominant frequency by Nakamura’s ratio technique. Engineering Geology 106 (3–4): 123–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, A., C. S. Dubey, T. K. Kelty, G. E. Gehrels, C. Y. Chou, M. Grove, and O. Lovera. 2006. Structural evolution of the Arunachal Himalaya and implications for asymmetric development of the Himalayan orogen. Current Science 90: 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar