Correlation Analysis of Ground Motion Duration Indexes and Nonlinear Seismic Responses of a Long-span Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridge with High-Rise Piers

References

• Arias, A. 1970. A measure of earthquake intensity. In Seismic design for nuclear power plants, ed. R. J. Hansen, 438–483. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. R., F. L. A. Ribeiro, and L. A. C. Neves. 2017. Influence of earthquake ground-motion duration on damage estimation: Application to steel moment resisting frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (1): 27–49. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., and A. Martinez-Pereira. 1999. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3 (2): 127–172. doi: 10.1080/13632469909350343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., and A. Martinez-Pereira 2000. Strong-motion parameters: Definition, usefulness and predictability. In Proc. of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., P. J. Stafford, and J. E. Alarcón. 2009. Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (6): 3217–3233. doi: 10.1785/0120080298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendon, A., and Bradley. 2011. Correlation of significant duration with amplitude and cumulative intensity measures and its use in ground motion selection. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (6): 809–832. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2011.557140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandramohan, R., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein. 2016. Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records. Earthquake Spectra 32 (2): 927–950. doi: 10.1193/122813eqs298mr2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusicka, P., and A. Lopez 2016. Impact of cascadia subduction zone earthquake on the seismic evaluation criteria of bridges: technical report: SPR 770. Department of Transportation, Research Section.
   Google Scholar
• Foschaar, J. C., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein 2012. Preliminary assessment of ground motion duration effects on structural collapse. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Gou, H. Y., H. Long, Y. Bao, G. Chen, Q. Pu, and R. Kang. 2018. Stress distributions in girder-arch-pier connections of long-span continuous rigid frame arch railway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 23 (7): 04018039. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Y. Huang, and W. Zhuo. 2011. Study on seismic vulnerability of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge with high piers. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 31 (2): 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, A. X., Y. Shen, J. L. Bai, and H. Li. 2017. Application of the endurance time method to the seismic analysis and evaluation of highway bridges considering pounding effects. Engineering Structures 131: 220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammad, A., and M. A. Moustafa. 2019. Shake table tests of special concentric braced frames under short and long-duration earthquakes. Engineering Structures 200: 109695. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. P., X. Y. Sun, and Y. Zhou. 2017. Duration effect of spectrally matched ground motion records on collapse resistance capacity evaluation of RC frame structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 26 (18): e1397. doi: 10.1002/tal.1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., and J. J. Bommer. 2006. A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage. Earthquake Spectra 22 (3): 827–845. doi: 10.1193/1.2220576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., and J. J. Bommer. 2007. Using spectral matched records to explore the influence of strong-motion duration on inelastic structural response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (4): 291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2006. Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (1): 21–38. doi: 10.1002/eqe.529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, M. R., A. H. M. Muntasir Billah, and M. Shahria Alam. 2019. Seismic fragility assessment of a multi-span RC bridge in Bangladesh considering near-fault, far-field and long-duration ground motions. Structures 19: 333–348. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., Y. Takahashi, H. Ge, Z. Wu, and J. Zhang. 2009. Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 13 (7): 965–996. doi: 10.1080/13632460902859169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempton, J. J., and J. P. Stewart. 2006. Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects. Earthquake Spectra 22 (4): 985–1013. doi: 10.1193/1.2358175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. L., and C. M. Gianotti. 1995. Inelastic structural response to Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 11 (1): 63–89. doi: 10.1193/1.1585803.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M. S., D. Sanders, and I. Buckle 2015. Shake table tests of reinforced concrete bridge columns under long-duration ground motions. In 6th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, S., and R. Desroches. 2006. A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (7): 811–828. doi: 10.1002/eqe.557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, Y. C., J. W. Song, P. H. Wang, L. Adidharma, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2013. Ground motion duration effects on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering 140 (3): 04013065. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., C. C. Fu, and Y. Jiang. 2010. Uncertainty analysis of creep and shrinkage effects in long-span continuous rigid frame of Sutong Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering 16 (2): 248–258. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, M., and A. B. Liel. 2013. Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse. Structural Safety 41: 119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahnama, M., and L. Manuel 1996. The effect of strong motion duration on seismic demands. In 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.924, Acapulco, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji, Y., K. Tanii, and M. Kamiyama 2004. The duration and amplitude characteristics of earthquake ground motions with emphasis on local site effects. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.436, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Taflanidis, A. A. 2011. Optimal probabilistic design of seismic dampers for the protection of isolated bridges against near-fault seismic excitations. Engineering Structures 33 (12): 3496–508. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., H. Y. Pan, and R. S. Ma. 2019. Probabilistic seismic demand model and fragility analysis of transmission tower subjected to near-field ground motions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 156: 266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake of ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American 65 (3): 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar