Evaluation of the Local Site Effects and Their Implication to the Seismic Risk of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Old City of Dubrovnik (Croatia)

References

• Aki, K. 1993. Local site effects on weak and strong ground motion. Tectonophysics 218 (1–3):93–111. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(93)90262-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoroso, S., I. Gaudiosi, M. Tallini, G. Di Giulio, and G. Milana. 2018. 2D site response analysis of a cultural heritage: The case study of the site of Santa Maria di Collemaggio Basilica (L’aquila, Italy). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (10):4443–66. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0356-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askan, A., S. Karimzadeh, M. Asten, N. Kilic, F. N. Şişman, and C. Erkmen. 2015. Assessment of seismic hazard in the Erzincan (Turkey) region: Construction of local velocity models and evaluation of potential ground motions. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 24 (6):529–65. doi:10.3906/yer-1503-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, P.-Y., M. Campillo, F. J. Chávez-Garcia, and F. Sánchez-Sesma. 1988. The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985—A theoretical investigation of large- and small-scale amplification effects in the Mexico City Valley. Earthquake Spectra 4 (3):609–33. doi:10.1193/1.1585493.
   Google Scholar
• Bard, P., A. Duval, A. Koehler, and S. Rao, 2004. Guidelines for the Implementation of the H/V Spectral Ratio Technique on Ambient Vibrations Measurements, Processing and Interpretation. SESAME H/V User Guidelines. p. 62. Accessed August 12, 2022 http://sesame.geopsy.org/SES_Reports.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., C. Cornou, P.-Y. Bard, F. Cotton, P. Moczo, J. Kristek, and D. Fäh. 2006. H/V ratio: A tool for site effects evaluation. Results from 1-D noise simulations. Geophysical Journal International 167 (2):827–37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03154.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boore, D. M. 2004. Estimating Vs(30) (or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models (depths < 30 m). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (2):591–97. doi:10.1785/0120030105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellaro, S., and F. Mulargia. 2009. VS30 estimates using constrained H/V measurements. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (2A):761–73. doi:10.1785/0120080179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN-Eurocode 8. 2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998-1:2004). Vol. 1, 231. Brussels: European Committee for Normalization. [Authority: The European Union per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
   Google Scholar
• Cetin, K. O., S. Altun, A. Askan, M. Akgün, A. Sezer, C. Kıncal, Ö. C. Özdağ, Y. İ̇pek, B. Unutmaz, Z. Gülerce, et al. 2022. The site effects in Izmir Bay of October 30 2020, M7. 0 Samos earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 152:107051. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico, S., M. Picozzi, F. Baliva, and D. Albarello. 2008. Ambient noise measurements for preliminary site-effects characterization in the Urban area of Florence, Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (3):1373–88. doi:10.1785/0120070231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Monaco, F., M. Tallini, C. De Rose, and F. Durante. 2013. HVNSR survey in historical downtown L’Aquila (central Italy): Site resonance properties vs. subsoil model. Engineering Geology 158:34–47. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivre, S., T. Bakran-Petricioli, M. Herak, J. Barešić, and D. Borković. 2021. Late Holocene interplay between coseismic uplift events and interseismic subsidence at Koločep island and Grebeni islets in the Dubrovnik archipelago (southern Adriatic, Croatia). Quaternary Science Reviews 274:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiaschi, A., L. Matassoni, G. Pratesi, C. A. Garzonio, and P. Malesani. 2012. Microtremor analysis of the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre Jerusalem. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 41:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, S., F. Hollender, F. Garofalo, D. Albarello, M. Asten, P.-Y. Bard, C. Comina, C. Cornou, B. Cox, G. Di Giulio, et al. 2018. Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: A product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (6):2367–420. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Građevinski institut 1981. Geotehnički istražni radovi i seizmička mikrorajonizacija stare gradske jezgre Dubrovnika, Geomehanička istraživanja, Fakultet građevinskih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zavod za geotehniku (in Croatian).
   Google Scholar
• Grgić, M., J. Bender, and T. Bašić. 2020. Estimating vertical land motion from remote sensing and in-situ observations in the Dubrovnik area (Croatia): A multi-method case study. Remote Sensing 12 (21):3543. doi:10.3390/rs12213543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. C., B. R. Cox, E. M. Rathje, and D. P. Teague. 2016. Surface-wave dispersion approach for evaluating statistical models that account for shear-wave velocity uncertainty. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142 (11):04016061 1–16. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gušić, I., and V. Jelaska. 1990. Stratigrafija gornjokrednih naslaga otoka Brača u okviru geodinamske evolucije Jadranske karbonatne platforme (Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Island of Brač within the geodynamic evolution of the Adriatic carbonate platform). In Djela Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti, Vol. 69, 160. Zagreb: Institut za geološka istraživanja Zagreb, OOUR za geologiju.
   Google Scholar
• Herak, M. 2011. Overview of recent ambient noise measurements in Croatia in free-field and in buildings. Geofizika 28:21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herak, M., D. Herak, and S. Markušić. 1996. Revision of the earthquake catalogue and seismicity of Croatia, 1908–1992. Terra Nova 8 (1):86–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1996.tb00728.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husinec, A., 2002. Stratigrafija mezozojskih naslaga otoka Mljeta u okviru geodinamske evolucije južnoga dijela Jadranske karbonatne platforme. Unpublished PhD thesis, Zagreb University, 300. (includes English Summary).
   Google Scholar
• Husinec, A., B. Prtoljan, L. Fuček, and T. Korbar. 2016. Osnovna geološka karta Republike Hrvatske mjerila 1:50 000 – list Otok Mljet. Zagreb: Hrvatski geološki institut, Zavod za geologiju. 1 list, ISBN: 978-953-6907-57-1. https://www.hgi-cgs.hr/osnovna-geoloska-karta/150-000-geolosko-geografska-podrucja/.
   Google Scholar
• Jakka, R. S., A. Desai, and S. Foti. 2023. Guidelines for minimization of uncertainties and estimation of a reliable shear wave velocity profile using MASW testing: A state-of-the-art review. In Advances in Earthquake Geotechnics, ed. T. G. Sitharam, R. S. Jakka, and S. Kolathayar, 211–53. Singapore: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3330-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Jelić, R. 1994. Dubrovnik je nastao u uvali. Naše More 41 (3–4):167–74. (in Croatian). https://hrcak.srce.hr/209750.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklamanos, J., L. G. Baise, E. M. Thompson, and L. Dorfmann. 2015. Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 69:207–19. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, K. 1957. Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground motion. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute 35 (2):309–25.
   Google Scholar
• Korbar, T. 2009. Orogenic evolution of the external dinarides in the NE Adriatic region: A model constrained by tectonostratigraphy of upper cretaceous to Paleogene carbonates. Earth-Science Reviews 96 (4):296–312. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbar, T., T. Grgasović, L. Fuček. 2023. Geology of the Old Town Dubrovnik. In 36th IAS Meeting of Sedimentology, Dubrovnik, 12–16 June 2023, Field Trips Guidebook, ed. T. Korbar, Zagreb: Field Trip B1.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, V., E. Prelogović, and I. Dragičević. 2000. Seismotectonically active zones in the Dinarides, Geol. Croat 53 (2):295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Labbé, P., and R. Paolucci 2022. Developments relating to seismic action in the Eurocode 8 of next generation. In: R. Vacareanu and C. Ionescu (ed.) Progresses in European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. ECEES 2022. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15104-0_2.
   Google Scholar
• Leyton, F., S. Ruiz, S. A. Sepúlveda, J. P. Contreras, S. Rebolledo, and M. Astroza. 2013. Microtremors’ HVSR and its correlation with surface geology and damage observed after the 2010 Maule earthquake (Mw 8.8) at Talca and Curico, Central Chile. Engineering Geology 161:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzi, L., R. Puglia, F. Pacor, M. R. Gallipoli, D. Bindi, and M. Mucciarelli. 2011. Proposal for a soil classification based on parameters alternative or complementary to Vs,30. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (6):1877–98. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9274-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marković, B., 1971. Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100.000, List Dubrovnik K34–49. Zavod za geološka i geofizička istraživanja, Beograd (1963–1965), Savezni geološki institut, Beograd. Available on: https://www.hgi-cgs.hr/osnovna-geoloska-karta-republike-hrvatske-1100-000/
   Google Scholar
• Markušić, S., I. Ivančić, and I. Sović. 2017. The 1667 Dubrovnik earthquake – some new insights. Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica 61 (3):587–600. doi:10.1007/s11200-016-1065-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markušić, S., D. Stanko, D. Penava, D. Trajber, and R. Šalić. 2021. Preliminary observations on historical castle Trakošćan (Croatia) performance under recent ML ≥ 5.5 earthquakes. Geosciences 11 (11):461, 17. doi:10.3390/geosciences11110461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihevc, A., M. Prelovšek, and N. Zupan Hajna, eds. 2010. Introduction to the dinaric karst 71. Postojna: Karst Research Institute at ZRC SAZU. doi:10.3986/9789612541989.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, H., H. Fujita, K. S. S. Than, and Y. Hibino. 2019. Estimation of site response during the 2016 Chauk, Myanmar earthquake based on microtremor-derived S-wave velocity structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 126:105781. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciarelli, M., and M. R. Gallipoli. 2001. A critical review of 10 years of microtremor HVSR technique. Bolletino di geofisica teorica es applicate 42 (3–4):255–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Y. 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of the Railway Technical Research Institute 30 (1):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Y., E. D. Gurler, and J. Saita, 1999. Dynamic characteristics of leaning tower in Pisa using microtremor – preliminary results. 25th Japan Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo
   Google Scholar
• Panzera, F., G. Romagnoli, G. Tortorici, S. D’Amico, M. Rizza, and S. Catalano. 2019. Integrated use of ambient vibrations and geological methods for seismic microzonation. Journal of Applied Geophysics 170:103820. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci, E., D. Albarello, S. D’Amico, E. Lunedei, L. Martelli, M. Mucciarelli, and D. Pileggi. 2015. A large scale ambient vibration survey in the area damaged by May–June 2012 seismic sequence in Emilia Romagna, Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (11):3187–206. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9767-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. B., R. D. Miller, and J. Xia. 1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64 (3):800–08. doi:10.1190/1.1444590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.-J., D.-S. Kim, and D.-M. Kim. 2013. Seismic risk assessment of architectural heritages in Gyeongju considering local site effects. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (2):251–62. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-251-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, V., P. Bergamo, and D. Fäh. 2022. Evaluating the minimum number of earthquakes in empirical site response assessment: Input for new requirements for microzonation in the Swiss building codes. Frontiers in Earth Science 10:917855. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.917855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picha, F. J. 2002. Late orogenic strike-slip faulting and escape tectonics in frontal Dinarides-Hellenides, Croatia, Yugoslavia, Albania and Greece. AAPG Bulletin 86 (9):1659–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., E. Riga, A. Anastasiadis, S. Fotopoulou, and S. Karafagka. 2019. Towards the revision of EC8: Proposal for an alternative site classification scheme and associated intensity dependent spectral amplification factors. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 126:126. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonikios, T., N. Theodoulidis, and G. Zacharopoulou. 2020. Seismic response evaluation of monuments based on ambient vibrations: The case studies of a byzantine basilica and an ottoman bath in Thessaloniki (Greece). Journal of Seismology 24 (4):777–802. doi:10.1007/s10950-020-09906-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, S. M., D. Bernoulli, B. Fügenschuh, L. Matenco, S. Schefer, R. Schuster, M. Tischler, and K. Ustaszewski. 2008. The alps– Carpathians–dinarides connection: A compilation of tectonic units. Swiss Journal of Geosciences 101 (1):139–83. doi:10.1007/s00015-008-1247-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwellenbach, I., K.-G. Hinzen, G. M. Petersen, and C. Bottari. 2020. Combined use of refraction seismic, MASW and ambient noise array measurements to determine the near surface velocity structure in the archaeological park of selinunte, SW Sicily. Journal of Seismology 24 (4):753–76. doi:10.1007/s10950-020-09909-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seht, I. V., and J. Wohlenberg. 1999. Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89 (1):250–59. doi:10.1785/BSSA0890010250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šolaja, D., S. Miko, D. Brunović, N. Ilijanić, O. Hasan, G. Papatheodorou, M. Geraga, T. Durn, D. Christodoulou, and I. Razum. 2022. Late quaternary evolution of a submerged karst basin influenced by active tectonics (Koločep Bay, Croatia). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10 (7):881. doi:10.3390/jmse10070881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko, D., and S. Markušić. 2020. An empirical relationship between resonance frequency, bedrock depth and Vs30 for Croatia based on HVSR forward modelling. Natural Hazards 103 (3):3715–43. doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04152-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko, D., I. Sović, N. Belić, and S. Markušić. 2022. Analysis of local site effects in the Međimurje Region (North Croatia) and its consequences related to historical and recent earthquakes. Remote Sensing 14 (19):4831. doi:10.3390/rs14194831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuber, T., T. Korbar, V. Jelaska, and I. Gušić. 2005. Strontium-isotope stratigraphy of upper cretaceous platform carbonates of the island of Brač (Adriatic Sea, Croatia): Implications for global correlation of platform evolution and biostratigraphy. Cretaceous Research 26 (5):741–56. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2005.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surić, M., T. Korbar, and M. Juračić. 2014. Tectonic constraints on the late pleistocene-holocene relative sea-level change along the north-eastern Adriatic coast (Croatia). Geomorphology 220:93–103. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro, G. R. 2022. Uncertainty in shear-wave velocity profiles. Journal of Seismology 26 (4):713–30. doi:10.1007/s10950-022-10084-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tün, M., E. Pekkan, O. Özel, and Y. Guney. 2016. An investigation into the bedrock depth in the Eskisehir Quaternary Basin (Turkey) using the microtremor method. Geophysical Journal International 207 (1):589–607. doi:10.1093/gji/ggw294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahović, I., J. Tišljar, I. Velić, and D. Matičec. 2005. Evolution of the Adriatic carbonate platform: Palaeogeography, main events and depositional dynamics. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220 (3–4):333–60. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., R. D. Miller, and C. B. Park. 1999. Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics 64 (3):691–700. doi:10.1190/1.1444578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar