A Machine-Learning-Based Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Approach for Low-Rise RC Buildings

References

• Akyuz, H. S., R. Hartleb, A. Barka, E. R. H. A. N. Altunel, G. Sunal, B. Meyer, and V. R. Armijo. 2002. Surface rupture and slip distribution of the 12 November 1999 Duzce earthquake (M 7.1), North Anatolian fault, Bolu, Turkey. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92 (1):61–66. doi:10.1785/0120000840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansal, A., K. Özaydın, A. Edinçliler, A. Saglamer, H. Sucuoglu, and P. Özdemir. 2003. Earthquake master plan for Istanbul. Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul, Planning and Construction Directorate, Geotechnical and Earthquake Investigation Department: Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Arya, A. S. 2011. Rapid structural and non-structural assessment of school and hospital buildings in SAARC countries. SAARC Disaster Management Centre, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Aydan, Ö., R. Ulusay, and M. Miyajima. 2003. The Bingöl Earthquake of May 1, 2003. Japan Society of Civil: Tokyo, Japan. https://www.jsce.or.jp/report/19/report/report200307.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coskun, O., A. Aldemir, and M. Sahmaran. 2020. Rapid screening method for the determination of seismic vulnerability assessment of RC building stocks. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (4):1401–16. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00751-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derczynski, L. 2016. Complementarity, F-score, and NLP Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), 261–66. Portorož, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Fathi-Fazl, R., Z. Cai, E. Jacques, and W. L. Cortés-Puentes. 2021. Methodology for seismic risk screening of existing buildings in Canada: Structural scoring system. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 48 (3):250–62. doi:10.1139/cjce-2019-0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A. F., and M. A. Sozen. 1997. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes. ACI Structural Journal 94 (1):31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2018. A report on emergency plan of action operation for 2016 Ecuador earthquake.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S. K., K. Mitra, M. Kumar, and M. Shah. 2010. A proposed rapid visual screening procedure for seismic evaluation of RC-frame buildings in India. Earthquake Spectra 26 (3):709–29. doi:10.1193/1.3456711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, K., D. Wald, and K. Porter. 2010. A global building inventory for earthquake loss estimation and risk management. Earthquake Spectra 26 (3):731–48. doi:10.1193/1.3450316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardine, N., and C. J. van Rijsbergen. 1971. The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval 7 (5):217–40. doi:10.1016/0020-0271(71)90051-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. G., and D. R. Fick. 2018. Generalized trends of severe damage observed from building surveys of seven different Earthquakes. Paper presented at the Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, California, June 25.
   Google Scholar
• JPDPA. 2001. Seismic evaluation and retrofit, the Japan building disaster prevention association.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H., S. Yilmaz, H. Binici, E. Yazar, and N. Çetinkaya. 2004. May 1, 2003 Turkey—Bingöl earthquake: Damage in reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Failure Analysis 11 (3):279–91. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2003.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem, M. M., F. M. Nazri, and E. N. Farsangi. 2020. The seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies: A state-of-the-art review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 11 (4):849–64. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., Y. Chu, S. R. Kim, and D. Bhandari. 2018. Seismic behavior of domestic piloti-type buildings damaged by 2017 Pohang earthquake. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea 22 (3):161–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum, D. G., K. Dietz, M. Gail, M. Klein, and M. Klein. 2002. Logistic regression, 536. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kostinakis, K., A. Athanatopoulou, and K. Morfidis. 2015. Correlation between ground motion intensity measures and seismic damage of 3D R/C buildings. Engineering Structures 82:151–67. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. M., and S. I. Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: 4768–4777.
   Google Scholar
• Mangalathu, S., H. Sun, C. C. Nweke, Z. Yi, and H. V. Burton. 2020. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning. Earthquake Spectra 36 (1):183–208. doi:10.1177/8755293019878137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCREE, Purdue University. 2016. 2016 Taiwan (Meinong) Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/534.
   Google Scholar
• Ningthoujam, M. C., and R. P. Nanda. 2018. Rapid visual screening procedure of existing building based on statistical analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 28:720–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NZSEE. 2006. Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in Earthquake, recommendations of a NZSEE study group on Earthquake risk buildings, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi, B. K. 2004. Damage due to the Mw 7.7 Kutch, India earthquake of 2001. Tectonophysics 390 (1–4):85–103. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2004.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojahn, C., C. D. Poland, and C. Scawthorn. 1988. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: Supporting documentation. Vol. 21, No. 1. Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Şen, Z. 2010. Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (8):5653–60. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, P., S. Pujol, A. Puranam, and L. Laughery. 2016. 2015 Nepal Earthquake Building Performance Database. Accessed 2022. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/537.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., I. Choi, and J. Kim. 2021. Rapid decision-making tool of piloti-type RC building structure for seismic performance evaluation and retrofit strategy using multi-dimensional structural parameter surfaces. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 151:106978. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, C., L. Laughery, T. C. Chiou, and P. W. Weng. 2018. 2017 Pohang Earthquake-reinforced concrete building damage survey. Accessed 2022. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/296.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, C., C. Song, N. Skok, A. Irfanoglu, S. Pujol, and M. Sozen. 2016. Database of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings with earthquake damage. Accessed 2022. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/454.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, C., E. Villalobos, J. P. Smith, P. Rojas, A. Y. Puranam, L. Laughery, and P. Santiago. 2016. 2016 Ecuador Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/535.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 1999. Duzce Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp0009hev/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2003. Bingol Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000bwbc/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2015. Nepal Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002926/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2016a. Ecuador Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20005j32/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2016b. Taiwan Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20004y6h/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2017. Pohang Earthquake. Accessed 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000bnrs/shakemap.
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos, E., C. Sim, J. P. Smith-Pardo, P. Rojas, S. Pujol, and M. E. Kreger. 2018. The 16 April 2016 Ecuador earthquake damage assessment survey. Earthquake Spectra 34 (3):1201–17. doi:10.1193/060217EQS106M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, H. Kanamori, C. W. Scrivner, and C. B. Worden. 1999. TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15 (3):537–55. doi:10.1193/1.1586057.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D. J., B. C. Worden, V. Quitoriano, and K. L. Pankow. 2005. ShakeMap manual: Technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide. No. 12-A1. Accessed 2022. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/pdf/508TM12-A1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, H. O., and F. Neumann. 1931. Modified Mercalli intensity scale of 1931. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 21 (4):277–83. doi:10.1785/BSSA0210040277.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., H. V. Burton, H. Sun, and M. Shokrabadi. 2018. A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety. Structural Safety 72:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar