Effect of Friction Dependencies on the Bidirectional Earthquake Response of Double Concave Friction Pendulum Bearings

References

• AASHTO. 1993. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Washington, DC, US: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Architectural Institute of Japan. 2016. Design recommendations for seismically isolated buildings. Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 7-16. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., T. C. Becker, T. Sone, and H. Hamaguchi. 2017. Experimental study of the effect of restraining rim design on the extreme behavior of pendulum sliding bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (4):906–24. doi:10.1002/eqe.2997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzoni, G., and F. Seible. 1998. Design of the Caltrans Seismic Response Modification Device (SRMD) test facility (IWGFR–96), Vol. 325. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); International Working Group on Fast Reactors.
   Google Scholar
• Bertero, V. V., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2004. The early years of earthquake engineering and its modern goal. Earthquake Engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. ed. Bozorgnia and VV Bertero. London, UK: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780203486245.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., and A. C. Wijeyewickrema. 2017. Seismic response evaluation of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings under bidirectional excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 16 (2):365–82. doi:10.1007/s11803-017-0387-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, P. M., and G. M. Calvi. 2018. Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 106:14–30. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., and V. Spaziante. 2009. Reconstruction between temporary and definitive: The CASE project. Progettazione sismica 3:221–250.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, M. C., A. S. Whittaker, Y. Kalpakidis, D. M. Fenz, and G. P. Warn. 2007. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical Rep. No. MCEER-07-0012, MCEER, NY, US.
   Google Scholar
• De Domenico, D., G. Ricciardi, and G. Benzoni. 2018. Analytical and finite element investigation on the thermo-mechanical coupled response of friction isolators under bidirectional excitation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 106:131–47. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, A., and L. G. Guidi. 2019. State of art in the worldwide evolution of base isolation design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 125:105722. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthquake Protection Systems. n.d. https://www.earthquakeprotection.com/.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization. 2004. General rules, Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures; Part 1: Seismic actions and rules for buildings. BS EN 1998-1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Furinghetti, M., A. Pavese, V. Quaglini, and P. Dubini. 2019. Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of double curved surface sliders subjected to radial and bidirectional sliding motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 117:190–202. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furinghetti, M., T. Yang, P. M. Calvi, and A. Pavese. 2021. Experimental evaluation of extra-stroke displacement capacity for curved surface slider devices. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 146:106752. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideji, N., N. Koji, and T. Atsushi. 2014. 21241 Development of spherical sliding bearing resisting high bearing pressure (Part 1) [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan, Construction II.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Society of Seismic Isolation. n.d. https://www.jssi.or.jp/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M. 1990. Base isolation: Linear theory and design. Earthquake Spectra 6 (2):223–44. doi:10.1193/1.1585566.
   Google Scholar
• Kitayama, S., and M. C. Constantinou. 2021. Effect of superstructure modeling assumptions on the seismic performance of seismically isolated buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50 (7):1805–23. doi:10.1002/eqe.3427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K-NET. n.d. https://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/
   Google Scholar
• Koji, N., W. Naoya, and K. Hasegawa. 2017. 21479 Full-scale experiment of low-friction-type spherical sliding bearing on behavior confirmation [in Japanese]. Construction II: Architectural Institute of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., A. S. Whittaker, and M. C. Constantinou. 2015. Characterizing friction in sliding isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (9):1409–25. doi:10.1002/eqe.2524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., S. Kishiki, S. Yamada, S. Yamazaki, A. Watanabe, and M. Terashima. 2020. Energy-based prediction of the displacement of DCFP bearings. Applied Sciences 10 (15):5259. doi:10.3390/app10155259.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., M. Nitawaki, S. Kishiki, T. Ishida, K. Nishimoto, A. Watanabe, and S. Yamada. 2018. Analytical study on spherical sliding bearing (SSB) subjected to tri-directional excitation: Effect of bearing stress and velocity dependency of SSB on the response of isolation system. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, Paper No. 21490, Tohoku, Japan, September 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., S. Yamada, S. Kishiki, S. Yamazaki, A. Watanabe, and M. Terashima. 2021. Experimental and numerical study of spherical sliding bearing (SSB) - part 3: Seismic response. Proceeding 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 17WCEE, Paper N° C000736, Session No. O01C01, Sendai, Japan, September– October 28–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lomiento, G., N. Bonessio, and G. Benzoni. 2013. Concave sliding isolator’s performance under multi-directional excitation. Ingegneria Sismica 30 (3):17–32. doi:10.1080/13632469.2013.814611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makris, N. 2019. Seismic isolation: Early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (2):269–83. doi:10.1002/eqe.3124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokha, A. S., M. C. Constantinou, and A. M. Reinhorn. 1993. Verification of friction model of teflon bearings under triaxial load. Journal of Structural Engineering 119 (1):240–61. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:1(240).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosqueda, G., A. S. Whittaker, and G. L. Fenves. 2004. Characterization and modeling of friction pendulum bearings subjected to multiple components of excitation. Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (3):433–42. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(433).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, H., K. Nishimoto, H. Hasegawa, and H. Nakamura. 2015. Predictive method of a temperature rise and the friction coefficient of spherical sliding bearing (Part 3), Paper No. 21232. AIJ, Kanto, Japan, September 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nakashima, M., P. Pan, D. Zamfirescu, and R. Weitzmann. 2004. Post-Kobe approach for design and construction of base-isolated buildngs. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering 4 (3):259–64. doi:10.5610/jaee.4.3_259.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimoto, K., H. Nakamura, H. Hasegawa, and N. Wakita. 2016. Bearing stress and velocity dependency of spherical sliding bearing through full-scale tests. Paper No. 21223. AIJ, Fukuoka, Japan, August 24–26 .
   Google Scholar
• NS-SSB. n.d. https://www.eng.nipponsteel.com/steelstructures/product/base_isolation/nsssb/.
   Google Scholar
• PEER. n.d. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzo, F. C., A. D. Cesare, G. Leccese, and D. Nigro. 2017. Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (14):2337–53. doi:10.1002/eqe.2907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzo, F. C., A. D. Cesare, A. Telesca, A. Pavese, and M. Furinghetti. 2021. Advanced modelling and risk analysis of rc buildings with sliding isolation systems designed by the Italian seismic code. Applied Sciences 11 (4):1938. doi:10.3390/app11041938.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglini, V., E. Gandelli, P. Dubini, G. Vazzana, and G. Farina. 2014. Re-centring capability of friction pendulum system: Experimental investigation. Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, TK.
   Google Scholar
• Shimazaki, D., and K. Nakagawa. 2015. Seismic isolation systems incorporating with RC core walls and precast concrete perimeter frames-Shimizu Corporation Tokyo Headquarter. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings 4 (3):181–89.
   Google Scholar
• Takanori, I., N. Masashi, and K. Shoichi. 2018. 21491 Experimental and analytical study on spherical sliding bearing subjected to bidirectional excitation part 1 bidirectional loading tests and verification of mechanical model. Architectural Institute of Japan, Construction II:981–82.
   Google Scholar
• Warn, G. P., and A. S. Whittaker. 2004. Performance estimates in seismically isolated bridge structures. Engineering Structures 26 (9):1261–78. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar