Response of Buried Pipeline to Non-Uniform Longitudinal and Transverse Ground Motions

References

• Ariman, T., and G. E. Muleski. 1981. A review of the response of buried pipeline under seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 9 (2):133–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and D. C. Booth. 2011. The Wenchuan earthquake of 2008. Heidelberg; Beijing; Berlin: Science Press; Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, T. 1999. Seismic response of buried pipeline: A state-of-the-art review. Nuclear Engineering & Design 192 (2–3):271–84. doi:10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. F. 1994. Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Preliminary reconnaissance report. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. Y., M. H. El Naggar, B. W. Hou, X. L. Du, Y. Shuai, and L. Y. Li. 2020a. Nonlinear soil response under non-uniform seismic excitation from multi-point shaking table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 139:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. Y., M. H. El Naggar, L. Y. Li, B. W. Hou, J. X. Xu, and X. L. Du. 2020b. Design and commissioning of continuous soil box supported on shake tables array for testing long geostructures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 132:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindy, A., and M. Novak. 1979. Earthquake response of underground pipelines. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 7 (5):451–76. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290070506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izumi, A., K. Ono, S. Takahara, Y. Sawada, and T. Kawabata. 2016. Axial behavior of buried rehabilitated pipe in liquefaction ground. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 3 (2):60–73. doi:10.1007/s40515-016-0030-6.
   Google Scholar
• Jafarzadeh, F., H. F. Jahromi, and E. A. Torghabeh. 2010. Investigating dynamic response of a buried pipeline in sandy soil layer by 1g shaking table test. International Journal of Civil Engineering 8 (2):107–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, T., Y. Sonoda, Y. Mohri, M. Ariyoshi, and Y. Iwasaki. 2012. Dynamic behavior of buried flexible pipes of varying thickness using the shaking table test. Proceedings of the Pipelines 2012 Conference, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. H., B. H. Kim, H. Lee, and J. S. Kong. 2009. Seismic behavior of a buried gas pipeline under earthquake excitations. Engineering Structures 31 (5):1011–23. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. C., and C. H. Loh. 2000. The Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake of September 21, 1999: Reconnaissance report. MCEER-00-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J. W., and S. P. Sun. 2000. Site effects on seismic behavior of pipeline: A review. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 122 (4):469–75. doi:10.1115/1.1285974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, H. I., Y. Mohri, T. Kawabata, H. Liu, C. Burke, and L. X. Sun. 2003. Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129 (12):1092–101. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E., and F. C. P. De Barros. 1994. Seismic response of a cylindrical shell embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. I: Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 23 (5):553–67. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, H., J. Chen, J. Li, G. W. Tang, and G. Zheng. 2008. Shaking table test of soil-pipe dynamic interaction under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation. Chinese Journal of Underground Space Engineering 5, 852–59. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, I., and P. Weidlinger. 1979. Dynamic seismic analysis of long segmented lifelines. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 101 (1):10–20. doi:10.1115/1.3454592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’rourke, M. J. 1995. Seismic behaviour of buried pipeline components: A state-of-the-art review. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Otsubo, M., I. Towhata, T. Hayashida, M. Shimura, T. Uchimura, B. Liu, D. Taeseri, B. Cauvin, and H. Rattez. 2016. Shaking table tests on mitigation of liquefaction vulnerability for existing embedded lifelines. Soils & Foundations 56 (3):348–64. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, S., A. Sextos, O. Kwon, S. Gerasimidis, and G. Deodatis. 2017. Impact of spatial variability of earthquake ground motion on seismic demand to natural gas transmission pipeline. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, W. W., I. Towhata, and S. Yamada. 2012. One-g shaking-table experiments on buried pipelines crossing a strike-slip fault. Geotechnique 62 (12):1067–79. doi:10.1680/geot.10.P.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. R. L., and K. M. Cheng. 1979. Seismic response behavior of buried pipelines. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 101 (1):21–30. doi:10.1115/1.3454594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, K. M., J. J. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, W. M. Liao, and Z. J. Wu. 2018. Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 113:180–92. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerva, A. 1993. Pipeline response to directionally and spatially correlated seismic ground motions. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 115 (1):53–58. doi:10.1115/1.2929495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerva, A. 1994. On the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its effects on lifelines. Engineering Structures 16 (7):534–46. doi:10.1016/0141-0296(94)90089-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerva, A., A. H. S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen. 1988. Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 16 (3):361–79. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290160306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar