Evaluation of Modified Frequency Dependent Equivalent Linear Method for Deconvolution Site Response Analysis

References

• Bayraktar, A., E. Hançer, and M. Akköse. 2005. Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Engineering Structures 27 (10):1498–508. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. Y., J. T. Chen, H.-K. Hong, and C. H. Chen. 1995. Application of Cesaro mean and the L-curve for the deconvolution problem. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 14:361–73. doi:10.1016/0267-7261(95)00003-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. T., H.-K. Hong, C. S. Yeh, and S. W. Chyuan. 1996. Integral represenations and regularizations for divergentseries solution of a beam subjected to multi-support motion. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25:909–25. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199609)25:9<909:AID-EQE591>3.0.CO;2-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeli, M. B. 2001. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. [Ph. D]. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A., L. Yan, Z. Yang, and J. P. Conte. 2008. Three-dimensional seismic response of humboldt bay bridge-foundation-ground system. Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (7):1165–76. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1165).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzell, S., L. F. Bonilla, and R. A. Williams. 2004. Prediction of nonlinear soil effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (5):1609–29. doi:10.1785/012003256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., M. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, G. Xing, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park. 2020. DEEPSOIL 7.0, user manual and tutorial. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D., G. Wang, C. Wang, and F. Jin. 2018. A modified frequency-dependent equivalent linear method for seismic site response analyses and model validation using KiK-Net borehole arrays. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 24 (5):827–844. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1453418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss, I. M., and J. I. Sun. 1992. SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits. Davis, CA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, C. G., D. Y. Kwak, D. Park, and K. Kim. 2010. Evaluation of frequency dependent equivalent linear analysis. In 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. San Diego, California: Missouri University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, S. H. 2013. A deconvolution scheme for determination of seismic loads in finite‐element analyses. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (1):258. doi:10.1785/0120120034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanda, J., O. S. Kwon, and G. Kwon. 2015. Time and frequency domain analyses of the Hualien large-scale seismic test. Nuclear Engineering and Design 295:261–75. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampitsis, A. E., E. J. Sapountzakis, S. K. Giannakos, and N. A. Gerolymos. 2013. Seismic soil–pile–structure kinematic and inertial interaction—A new beam approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 55:211–24. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausel, E., and D. Assimaki. 2002. Seismic simulation of inelastic soils via frequency-dependent moduli and damping. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128 (1):34–47. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(34).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottke, A., and E. M. Rathje. 2008. Technical manual for strata. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center Report 2008/10.
   Google Scholar
• Léger, P., and M. Boughoufalah. 1989. Earthquake input mechanisms for time-domain analysis of dam—Foundation systems. Engineering Structures 11 (1):37–46. doi:10.1016/0141-0296(89)90031-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meite, R., L. Wotherspoon, C. R. McGann, R. A. Green, and C. Hayden. 2020. An iterative linear procedure using frequency-dependent soil parameters for site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 130:105973. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poul, M. K., and A. Zerva. 2018. Efficient time-domain deconvolution of seismic ground motions using theequivalent-linear method for soil-structure interaction analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 112:138–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasankar, J., N. R. Iyer, B. Y. Swamy, N. Gopalakrishnan, and P. Chellapandi. 2007. SSI analysis of a massive concrete structure based on a novel convolution/deconvolution technique. Sadhana 32 (3):215–34. doi:10.1007/s12046-007-0019-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel, P. B., J. Lysmer, and H. B. Seed. 1972. SHAKE, a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. University of California Berkeley Report. Report EERC 72-12.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, W. J. 1988. Soil response to earthquake motion. Washington DC: Electric Power Prsearch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sooch, G. S., and A. Bagchi. 2014. A new iterative procedure for deconvolution of seismic ground motion in dam-reservoir-foundation systems. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2014:1–10. doi:10.1155/2014/287605.
   Google Scholar
• Sugito, M. 1995. Frequency-dependent equivalent strain for earthquake response analysis of soft ground. In Proceedings of IS-Tokyo’95, the first international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, 655–60. Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Sugito, M., H. Goda, and T. Masuda. 1994. Frequency dependent equi-linearized technique for seismic response analysis of multi-layered ground. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. M., L. G. Baise, Y. Tanaka, and R. E. Kayen. 2012. A taxonomy of site response complexity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 41:32–43. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., W.-S. Chang, and J.-S. Chiou. 2017. Enhancing prediction of ground response at the turkey flat geotechnical array. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 107 (5):2043–54. doi:10.1785/0120160324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., and C. W. Chen. 2016. Comparison study of 1D site response analysis method. Earthquake Spectra 32 (2):1075–95. doi:10.1193/071514eqs110m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). 2014. Standard review plan. NUREG-0800.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, N., S. Kobayashi, I. Suetomi, and K. Miura. 2002. Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 (3):205–22. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalachoris, G., and E. Rathje. 2015a. Evaluation of one-dimensional site response techniques using borehole arrays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 141 (12). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalachoris, G., and E. M. Rathje. 2015b. Evaluation of one-dimensional site response techniques using borehole arrays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 141 (12): 04015053–61. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., J. P. Conte, Z. Yang, A. Elgamal, J. Bielak, and G. Acero. 2008. Two-dimensional nonlinear earthquake response analysis of a bridge-foundation-ground system. Earthquake Spectra 24 (2):343–86. doi:10.1193/1.2923925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar