A Novel FRP Retrofit Solution for Improved Local and Global Seismic Performance of RC Buildings: Development of Fragility Curves and Comparative Cost-Benefit Analyses

References

• Akguzel, U., P. Quintana Gallo, and S. Pampanin. 2011. Seismic strengthening of a non-ductile RC frame structure using GFRP sheets. In Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering. Auckland, New Zealand. http://www.ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/5363.
   Google Scholar
• Alsayed, S. H., Y. A. Al-Salloum, T. H. Almusallam, and N. A. Siddiqui. 2010. Seismic response of FRP-Upgraded exterior RC beam-column joints. Journal of Composites for Construction 14 (2):195–208. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, S., and R. Pinho. 2004. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8 (5):643–61. doi:10.1080/13632460409350504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2015. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31 (1):579–99. doi:10.1193/021113EQS025M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournas, D. A. 2018. Concurrent seismic and energy retrofitting of RC and masonry building envelopes using inorganic textile-based composites combined with insulation materials: A new concept. Composites Part B Engineering 148:166–79. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournas, D. A., P. V. Lontou, C. G. Papanicolaou, and T. C. Triantafillou. 2007. Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP confinement in reinforced concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal 104 (6):740–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousias, S., A.-L. Spathis, and M. N. Fardis. 2007. Seismic retrofitting of columns with lap spliced smooth bars through FRP or concrete jackets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 11 (5):653–74. doi:10.1080/13632460601125714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousselham, A. 2010. State of research on seismic retrofit of RC beam-column joints with externally bonded FRP. Journal of Composites for Construction 14 (1):49–61. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2019. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative retrofit strategies for RC frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (2):208–41. doi:10.1080/13632469.2017.1323041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2004. BS EN 1998-1:2004 Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1:General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2006. BS EN 1998-3:2005 - Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-K., F.-P. Hsiao, and W.-Y. Jean. 2013. A novel lifetime cost-benefit analysis method for seismic retrofitting of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 9 (9):891–902. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.631114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNR. 2013. DT 200.R1/2013 - Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures - materials, RC and PC structures, masonry structures. Rome, Italy: CNR.
   Google Scholar
• CYPE. 2020. Gerador de Preços Na Construção - Portugal. http://geradordeprecos.cype.pt/reabilitacao.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D., A. Meslem, D. Vamvatsikos, K. Porter, T. Rossetto, H. Crowley, and V. Silva. 2014. Guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings – methodology. Vulnerability Global Component Project. www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-vulnerability/posts/.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, A. Balsamo, A. Prota, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2014. Experimental investigation of exterior RC beam-column joints retrofitted with FRP systems. Journal of Composites for Construction 18 (4). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, A. Prota, and S. Pampanin. 2016. Repair costs analysis for case study buildings damaged in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. In Proceedings of the 2016 NZSEE conference. Christchurch, New Zealand. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305789344_Repair_costs_analysis_for_case_study_buildings_damaged_in_the_2009_L%27Aquila_earthquake_2016_NZSEE_Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Engindeniz, M., L. F. Kahn, and A. H. Zureick. 2008. Performance of an RC corner beam-column joint severely damaged under bidirectional loading and rehabilitated with FRP composites. In Seismic strengthening of concrete buildings using FRP composites, 19–36. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute. http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gI72a6OHeQIC&oi=fnd&pg=PA25&dq=FRP+engindeniz&ots=JYz9bJ-q59&sig=9IYHOyFV6mMrotwhfuHuPvw43CQ.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. The European green deal - communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, D. R. S. M., and J. A. O. Barros. 2006. CFRP-Based confinement strategies for RC columns-experimental and analytical research (April). http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/5986.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou, F., and G. Fenves. 2004. Methods of analysis for earthquake- resistant structures. In Earthquake engineering, ed. Y. Bozorgnia and V. Bertero. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/10.1201/9780203486245.ch6.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2020. Cost-effective analysis of textile-reinforced mortar solutions used to reduce masonry infill walls collapse probability under seismic loads. Structures 28:141–57. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkatzogias, K., H. Crowley, A. Veljkovic, D. A. Pohoryles, H. Norlén, G. Tsionis, and D. A. Bournas. 2022. REEBUILD: Integrated techniques for the seismic strengthening and energy efficiency of existing buildings – prioritising EU regions for building renovation: Seismic Risk, energy efficiency, socioeconomic vulnerability. JRC128988. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gkournelos, P. D., T. C. Triantafillou, and D. A. Bournas. 2021. Seismic upgrading of existing reinforced concrete buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures 240:112273. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollaway, L. C. 2010. A review of the present and future utilisation of FRP composites in the civil infrastructure with reference to their important in-service properties. Construction and Building Materials 24 (12):2419–45. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., C. Galasso, and E. Cosenza. 2010. REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8 (2):339–62. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, A. J., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2008. Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves. Natural Hazards 45 (1):33–54. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9155-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8):1804–26. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastroberti, M., D. Bournas, M. Vona, B. Manganelli, and V. Palermo. 2018. Combined seismic plus energy retrofitting for the existing RC buildings: Economic feasibility. In Proceedings of the 16th European conference on Earthquake engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, J., D. A. Pohoryles, T. Rossetto, and H. Varum. 2021. Full-scale cyclic testing of realistic reinforced-concrete beam-column joints. MethodsX 8:101409. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal forces and bending moment. IASBE proceedings, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Orcamentos. 2022a. Orçamentos e Orçamentação Na Construção Civill, Sheet B0103 - Scaffolding. https://orcamentos.eu/fichas-de-rendimento-com-precos-de-andaimes/ (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Orcamentos. 2022b. Orçamentos e Orçamentação Na Construção Civill, Sheet C0203 - Demolitions. https://orcamentos.eu/fichas-de-rendimento-com-precos-de-demolicoes/ (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, V., G. Tsionis, and M. L. Sousa. 2018. Building stock inventory to assess seismic vulnerability across Europe. EUR 29257 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/530683.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazopoulou, S., S. Tastani, G. Thermou, T. Triantafillou, G. Monti, D. Bournas, and M. Guadagnini. 2016. Background to the European seismic design provisions for retrofitting RC elements using FRP materials. Structural Concrete Journal of the Fib 17 (2):194–219. doi:10.1002/suco.201500102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohoryles, D. A. 2017. Realistic FRP seismic strengthening schemes for interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints. PhD., University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Pohoryles, D. A., C. Maduta, D. A. Bournas, and L. A. Kouris. 2020. Energy performance of existing residential buildings in Europe: A novel approach combining energy with seismic retrofitting. Energy & Buildings 223:110024. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohoryles, D. A., J. Melo, T. Rossetto, D. D’Ayala, and H. Varum. 2018. Experimental comparison of novel CFRP retrofit schemes for realistic full-scale RC beam–column joints. Journal of Composites for Construction 22 (5):04018027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohoryles, D. A., J. Melo, T. Rossetto, H. Varum, and L. Bisby. 2019. Seismic retrofit schemes with FRP for deficient RC beam-column joints: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Composites for Construction 23 (4):03119001. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A. 2003. An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In Proceedings of ninth international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, San Francisco, California.
   Google Scholar
• REBA. 1967. Governo D. Regulamento de Estruturas de Betão Armado - Decreto n^.o 47723. Vol. 119. serie I. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., and A. Elnashai. 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 25 (10):1241–63. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismosoft Ltd. 2018. SeismoStruct (version 2018). Pavia (PV) - Italy: Seismosoft Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, S. A., and Y. Li. 2007. Design of FRP confinement for square concrete columns. Engineering Structures 29 (6):1074–83. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, V., H. Crowley, H. Varum, R. Pinho, and L. Sousa. 2015. Investigation of the characteristics of Portuguese regular moment-frame RC buildings and development of a vulnerability model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (5):1455–90. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9669-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, A. W., G. Altay, G. Deodatis, M. Erdik, G. Franco, P. Gulkan, H. Kunreuther, H. Luş, E. Mete, N. Seeber, et al. 2004. Probabilistic benefit-cost analysis for earthquake damage mitigation: Evaluating measures for apartment houses in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 20(1):171–203. doi:10.1193/1.1649937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Portugal. 2020a. Median value per M2 of dwellings sales (€) by geographic localization and category of housing unit; Quarterly. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0009484&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Portugal. 2020b. Proportion of buildings with repair needed (%) by geographic localization (at the date of census 2011); Decennial. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0006984&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2.
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, T. C. 2001. Seismic retrofitting of structures using FRPs. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 3 (1):57–65. doi:10.1002/pse.61.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (3):491–514. doi:10.1002/eqe.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdakul, Ö., C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, Ö. Avşar, and A. Prota. 2023. Fragility functions for fiber-reinforced polymers strengthened reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Engineering Structures 279:115570. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar