The Influence of Slope Angle Variation on Structures Resting on Hilly Region Considering Soil–Structure Interaction Under Earthquake Loadings Using Capacity Curves and Probabilistic Approach

References

• Adey, B., R. Hajdin, and E. Brudwile. 2004. Effect of common cause failures on indirect costs. Journal of Bridge Engineering 9 (2):200–08. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:2(200).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Y., and S. K. Saha. 2021. Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete hilly buildings with open story. In Structures, vol. 34, 224–238. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.069.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 41-13. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ATC. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA: US Department of Homeland Security.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal, A., Z. Mohammad, and A. Baqi. 2022. Seismic response of hill buildings with base isolation and URM infills. In Earthquakes and structures, 277–89. Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5673-6_22.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, D. S., S. E. Chang, H. Cochrane, R. A. Olson, A. Rose, and J. Steenson. 1997. Direct and indirect economic losses from earthquake damage. Earthquake Spectra 14 (4):683–701. doi:10.1193/1.1585975.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, A. S., and R. Banerjee. 2021. Seismic response of irregular building on sloping ground.
   Google Scholar
• Cordova, P. P., G. G. Deierlein, S. S. Mehanny, and C. A. Cornell. 2000. Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. In The second US-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for reinforced concrete building structures, 187–206. Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Estrella, X., P. Guindos, and J. L. Almazán. 2019. Ground motions for FEMA P-695 application in subduction zones. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 16 (9):16. doi:10.1590/1679-78255848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA 273. 1997. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 356. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA, P695. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors: Component equivalency methodology. Washington, DC: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Forcellini, D. 2019. A new methodology to assess indirect losses in bridges subjected to multiple hazards. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 4 (1). doi:10.1007/s41062-018-0195-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, R., and R. Debbarma. 2017. Performance evaluation of setback buildings with open ground storey on plain and sloping ground under earthquake loadings and mitigation of failure. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering 9 (2):97–110. doi:10.1007/s40091-017-0151-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. A., E. G. Díaz-Segura, and J. C. Vielma. 2021. Nonlinear numerical assessment of the seismic response of hillside RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 20 (2):423–40. doi:10.1007/s11803-021-2029-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. A., J. C. Vielma, and E. G. Díaz-Segura. 2022. Evaluación numérica de la respuesta sísmica de estructuras fundadas en laderas. Obras y Proyectos 2022 (31):67–76. doi:10.4067/S0718-28132022000100068.
   Google Scholar
• Jammula, D., and R. Konda. 2021. Seismic analysis of G+ 9 framed structures made of reinforced concrete resting on hill slopes. Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.484.
   Google Scholar
• Jingjiang, S., T. Ono, Z. Yangang, and W. Wei. 2003. Lateral load pattern in pushover analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2 (1):99–107. doi:10.1007/BF02857542.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsulkar, N. 2015. Seismic analysis of RCC building resting on sloping ground with varying number of bays and hill slopes.
   Google Scholar
• Kassem, M. M., S. Beddu, J. H. Ooi, C. G. Tan, A. Mohamad El-Maissi, and F. Mohamed Nazri. 2021b. Assessment of seismic building vulnerability using rapid visual screening method through web-based application for Malaysia. Buildings 11 (10):485. doi:10.3390/buildings11100485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem, M. M., Nazri, F.M., Farsangi, E.N. and Tan, C.G. 2021a. Comparative seismic RISK assessment of existing RC buildings using seismic vulnerability index approach. In Structures, 889–913. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Khadiranaikar, R., and A. Masali. 2015. Seismic performance of buildings resting on sloping ground. In Advances in structural engineering, 803–13. Springer India. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2193-7_63.
   Google Scholar
• Malaysia National Annex to MS EN 1998-1. 2017. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Putrajaya: Department of Standards Malaysia 1:1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Muceku, Y., O. Korini, and A. Kuriqi. 2016. Geotechnical analysis of hill’s slopes areas in heritage town of Berati. Albania Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 60 (1):61–73. doi:10.3311/PPci.7752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassirpour, A., D. D’Ayala, and C. Galasso. 2018. Increasing seismic resilience of Philippines’ school infrastructure through structural retrofitting. In 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE). Thessaloniki. Greece: European Association of Earthquake Engineering (EAEE).
   Google Scholar
• Prashant, D., and J. Kori. 2013. Seismic response of one way slope RC frame building with soft storey. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development 3 (5):311–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 14 (3):469–500. doi:10.1193/1.1586011.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Y. Gade, P. Lang, D.H. and Erduran, E. 2012. Seismic behavior of buildings located on slopes-an analytical study and some observations from Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011. In World conference in earthquake engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., and D. Kanungo. 2021. Structural vulnerability of buildings exposed to earthquake in Hilly Region: A conceptual framework. In Recent advances in structural engineering, 193–99. Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6389-2_19.
   Google Scholar
• Surana, M., Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang. 2018a. Effect of irregular structural configuration on floor acceleration demand in hill‐side buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (10):2032–54. doi:10.1002/eqe.3054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surana, M., Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang. 2018b. Seismic characterization and vulnerability of building stock in hilly regions. Natural Hazards Review 19 (1):04017024. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatoba Patil, R., and M. Raghunandan. 2019. Seismic performance assessment of buildings located on hillside slope.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, A., D. K. Ashish, and S. K. Verma. 2019. Influence of rooftop telecommunication tower on set back-step back building resting on different ground slopes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 18 (2):351–62. doi:10.1007/s11803-019-0508-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thombre, P. 2016. Seismic analysis of building resting on sloping ground.
   Google Scholar