Effects of Deck-Abutment Pounding on the Seismic Fragility Curves of Box-Girder Highway Bridges

References

• AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 2020. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2016. The Effect of In-Span Hinges on the Seismic Behavior of Multiple-Frame Reinforced Concrete Box Girder Bridge. In Proceedings of the Istanbul Bridge Conference, 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2019. “Time-Dependent Seismic Fragilities of Older and Newly Designed Multi-Frame Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges in California.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (1): 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1193/102317EQS220M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M., B. Zakeri, and G. G. Amiri. 2016. “Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Multiframe Concrete Box-Girder Bridges with Unequal-Height Piers.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 30 (2): 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amjadian, M., and A. K. Agrawal. 2016. “Rigid-Body Motion of Horizontally Curved Bridges Subjected to Earthquake-Induced Pounding.” Journal of Bridge Engineering 21 (12): 04016090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amjadian, M., A. Kalantari, and A. K. Agrawal. 2018. “Analytical Study of the Coupled Motions of Decks in Skew Bridges with the Deck–Abutment Collision.” Journal of Vibration and Control 24 (7): 1300–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316659781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotti, G., and C. G. Lai. 2019. “Use of Fragility Curves to Assess the Seismic Vulnerability in the Risk Analysis of Mountain Tunnels.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 91:103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyub, B. M., and K. L. Lai. 1989. “Structural Reliability Assessment Using Latin Hypercube Sampling.” In Proc., ICOSSAR’89, the 5th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Part II, ASCE, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., T. Lin, S. K. Shahi, and N. Jayaram. 2011. New Ground Motion Selection Procedures and Selected Motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of CaliforniaBerkeley, Berkeley, CA, PEER Report, ( 2011/3).
   Google Scholar
• Bertero, V. V., and R. C. Collins. 1973, “Investigation of the Failures of the Olive View Stairtowers During the San Fernando Earthquake and Their Implications on Seismic Design”, Report no. EERC 73-26, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Buckle, I. 1994. The Northridge, California Earthquake of January 11, 1994: Performance of Highway Bridges. Tech. Rep. NCEER-94-0068, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Buckle, I., M. Hube, G. Chen, W. H. Yen, and J. Arias. 2012. “Structural Performance of Bridges in the Offshore Maule Earthquake of 27 February 2010.” Earthquake Spectra 28 (S1): S533–S552. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000031
   Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. “Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.” Structural Safety 32 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander 1994. “Seismic Energy Based Fatigue Damage Analysis of Bridge Columns. Part 1—Evaluation of Seismic Capacity.” NCEER Technical Rep. No. NCEER-94-0006, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. F., and L. Duan, Eds. 2003. Bridge Engineering: Seismic Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Q. Han, X. Liang, and X. Du. 2017. “Effect of Pounding on Nonlinear Seismic Response of Skewed Highway Bridges.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 103:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E. 2002. “Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of Mid-America Bridges.” Doctoral dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chouw, N., and H. Hao. 2008a. “Significance of SSI and Nonuniform Near-Fault Ground Motions in Bridge Response I: Effect on Response with Conventional Expansion Joint.” Engineering Structures 30 (1): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouw, N., and H. Hao. 2008b. “Significance of SSI and Non-Uniform Near-Fault Ground Motions in Bridge Response II: Effect on Response with Modular Expansion Joint.” Engineering Structures 30 (1): 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouw, N., and H. Hao. 2012. “Pounding Damage to Buildings and Bridges in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake.” International Journal of Protective Structures 3 (2): 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.3.2.123.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines.” Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesRoches, R., and S. Muthukumar. 2002. “Effect of Pounding and Restrainers on Seismic Response of Multiple-Frame Bridges.” Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (7): 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(860).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesRoches, R., J. Padgett, K. Ramanathan, and J. Dukes. 2012. Feasibility Studies for Improving Caltrans Bridge Fragility Relationships ( No. CA12-1775).
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, E. G. 2011. “Seismic Response Analysis of Skew Bridges with Pounding Deck–Abutment Joints.” Engineering Structures 33 (3): 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, A.1999. On Energy-Based Seismic Analysis and Design of Highway Bridges. State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B., and H. Hwang. 1985. “Probabilistic Descriptions of Resistance of Safety-Related Structures in Nuclear Plants.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 88 (2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90059-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Maissi, A. M., S. A. Argyroudis, and F. M. Nazri. 2020. “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-Of-The-Art Review.” Sustainability 13 (1): 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J. Q., Q. S. Li, A. P. Jeary, and D. K. Liu. 1999. “Damping of Tall Buildings: Its Evaluation and Probabilistic Characteristics.” The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 8 (2): 145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2010. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Earthquake Model HAZUS-MH MR5 Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou, F. C., V. V. Bertero, and E. P. Popov. 1983. “Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints.” Report No.UCB/EERC-83/19 Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., A. Der Kiureghian, and K. M. Mosalam. 2002. “Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns Based on Experimental Observations.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128 (10): 1024–1038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. F. 1995. “Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 - Reconnaissance Report.” Earthquake Spectra 1:Rep. No. 95–03.
   Google Scholar
• Havaei, G., and S. A. Moayyedi. 2018. “Assessment of Sliding‐Rubber Isolator Effect in Progressive Collapse of Bridges Under Two Scenarios.” The Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings 27 (3): e1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y., and J. Zhang. 2012. “Effects of Pounding and Skewness on Seismic Responses of Typical Multispan Highway Bridges Using the Fragility Function Method.” Journal of Bridge Engineering 18 (6): 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. 2015. “Pounding Between Superstructure Segments in Multi-Supported Elevated Bridge with Three-Span Continuous Deck Under 3D Non-Uniform Earthquake Excitation.” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami 9 (4): 1550012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431115500128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. 2017. “Damage-Involved Structural Pounding in Bridges Under Seismic Excitation.” Key Engineering Materials 754:309–312. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.754.309.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R., and H. Walukiewicz. 1997. “Modeling of Two-Dimensional Random Fields.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 12 (2): 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(96)00040-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R., and K. Wilde. 2000. “A Simple Method of Conditional Random Field Simulation of Ground Motions for Long Structures.” Engineering Structures 22 (5): 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00125-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, H. Y., X. L. Lan, N. Luo, J. Yang, S. X. Zheng, and C. Zhang. 2019. “Nonlinear Pounding Analysis of Multispan and Simply Supported Beam Bridges Subjected to Strong Ground Motions.” Shock and Vibration 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8759428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, C., W. Liu, S. Wu, X. Gui, J. Huang, P. Long, and W. Li. 2021a. “Shake Table Experimental Study of Curved Bridges with Consideration of Girder-To-Girder Collision.” Engineering Structures 237:112216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, C., J. Lu, C. Wang, P. Long, and Z. Sun. 2021b. “Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Effects of Radius of Curvature and Longitudinal Slope on the Responses of Curved Bridges Subject to Seismic Pounding.” Measurement and Control 54 (3–4): 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211000377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantari, A., and S. A. Moayyedi. 2018. “Seismic Vertical Component Effects on Seismic Demands of a Base Isolated Bridge with Friction-Rubber Bearings.” Civil Engineering Research Journal 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.19080/CERJ.2018.03.555617.
   Google Scholar
• Kassem, M. M., F. Mohamed Nazri, L. J. Wei, C. G. Tan, S. Shahidan, and S. S. Mohd Zuki. 2019. “Seismic Fragility Assessment for Moment-Resisting Concrete Frame with Setback Under Repeated Earthquakes.” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering 20 (3): 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00119-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., S. Unjoh, J. I. Hoshikuma, and K. Kosa. 2011. “Damage of Bridges Due to the 2010 Maule, Chile, Earthquake.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (7): 1036–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.575531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., and M. Shinozuka. 2003. “Effects of Seismically Induced Pounding at Expansion Joints of Concrete Bridges.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 129 (11): 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:11(1225).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosa, K., K. Tazaki, and E. Yamaguchi. 2002. “Mechanism of Damage to Shiwei Bridge Caused by 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake.” Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering 19 (2): 221s–226s. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceseee.19.221s.
   Google Scholar
• Kun, C., L. Jiang, and N. Chouw. 2017. “Influence of Pounding and Skew Angle on Seismic Response of Bridges.” Engineering Structures 148:890–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., K. Bi, N. Chouw, J. W. Butterworth, and H. Hao. 2013. “Effect of Abutment Excitation on Bridge Pounding.” Engineering Structures 54:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, P. K. 1998. “Dynamics of Seismic Pounding at Expansion Joints of Concrete Bridges.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 124 (7): 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:7(794).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., D. K. Kim, S. S. Chen, and G. J. Premus 1996. Response of Steel Bridge Bearings to Reversed Cyclic Loading. Technical Rep. No. NCEER 96-0014, US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER).
   Google Scholar
• Mangalathu Sivasubramanian Pillai, S. 2017. “Performance Based Grouping and Fragility Analysis of Box-Girder Bridges in California.”
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, F. 2011. “OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation.” Computing in Science & Engineering 13 (4): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megally, S. H., M. Seible, F. Garg, and R. K. Dowell. 2001. “Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge superstructures.” SSRP 24 (2): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012002.40.56.
   Google Scholar
• Megally, S. H., P. F. Silva, and F. Seible. 2002. Seismic Response of Sacrificial Exterior Keys in Bridge Abutments. Report no. SSRP–2001/23. Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., and P. Pinto. 1973. Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded Reinforced Concrete Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements Under Combined Normal Force and Bending. In Proceedings IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Miari, M., K. K. Choong, and R. Jankowski. 2021. “Seismic Pounding Between Bridge Segments: A State-Of-The-Art Review.” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28 (2): 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09389-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayyedi, S. A., and A. Kalantari. 2021. “Computing the Effects of Vertical Ground Motion Component on Performance Indices of Bridge Sliding-Rubber Bearings.” Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 45 (2): 1197–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00278-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morokoff, W. J., and R. E. Caflisch. 1995. “Quasi Monte Carlo Integration.” Journal of Computational Physics 122 (2): 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, S., and R. DesRoches. 2006. “A Hertz Contact Model with Non‐Linear Damping for Pounding Simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazri, F. M. 2018. Seismic Fragility Assessment for Buildings Due to Earthquake Excitation. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• NBI (National Bridge Inventory). 2010. National Bridge Inventory Data. Washington, DC: U.S.Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G. 2005. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Seismic Fragility Methodology for Highway Bridges Using a Component Level Approach.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E. 2007. “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Retrofitted Bridges Using Probabilistic Methods.” Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the Development of Analytical Fragility Curves for Retrofitted Bridges.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, K. N. 2012. “Next Generation Seismic Fragility Curves for California Bridges Incorporating the Evolution in Seismic Design Philosophy.” Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, H., S. Arabestani, R. Akbari, and E. Noroozinejad Farsangi. 2022. “The Effects of Earthquake Incidence Angle on the Seismic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges of Unequal Pier Heights.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 18 (2): 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1842467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, H., S. A. Moayyedi, and R. Jankowski. 2020. “Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of RC Box-Girder Highway Bridges with Unequal-Height Piers Subjected to Earthquake-Induced Pounding.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (4): 1547–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00764-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, H., P. Zarfam, E. M. Golafshani, and G. G. Amiri. 2022. “Seismic Fragility Analysis of RC Box-Girder Bridges Based on Symbolic Regression Method.” Structures 38:306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, H., P. Zarfam, E. M. Golafshani, and G. G. Amiri. 2023. “Development of Seismic Demand Prediction Models for Bridges Based on Probability Approach Using Symbolic Regression Method.” Computers & Structures 282:106991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.106991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., D. D’Ayala, I. Ioannou, and A. Meslem. 2014. “Evaluation of Existing Fragility Curves.” SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk: Buildings, Lifelines, Transportation Networks and Critical Facilities 27: 47–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Ruangrassamee, A., and K. Kawashima. 2001. “Relative Displacement Response Spectra with Pounding Effect.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 30 (10): 1511–1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadeghvaziri, M. A., and A. Yazdani‐Motlagh. 2007. “Inelastic Seismic Response of Stiffening Systems and Development of Demand Spectrum: Application to MSSS Bridges.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (14): 2153–2169. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsabadi, A., and M. Kapuskar. 2010. “Nonlinear Soil–Abutment–Foundation–Structure Interaction Analysis of Skewed Bridges Subjected to Near-Field Ground Motions.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2202 (1): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.3141/2202-23.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsabadi, A., and L. Yan. 2008. “Closed-Form Force-Displacement Backbone Curves for Bridge Abutment-Backfill Systems.” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)159.
   Google Scholar
• Shantz, T., and C. Roblee. 2011. “Estimates of Foundation Springs, Piles Capacities and Uncertainties for Typical Caltrans Bridges.” [email] (Personal communication with Ramanathan K., DesRoches R., Padgett J. Dukes J. and Turner L., 25 March).
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2017. “Nonsmooth Dynamics Prediction of Measured Bridge Response Involving Deck‐Abutment Pounding.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (9): 1431–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, V., S. Akkar, J. Baker, P. Bazzurro, J. M. Castro, H. Crowley, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2019. “Current Challenges and Future Trends in Analytical Fragility and Vulnerability Modeling.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (4): 1927–1952. https://doi.org/10.1193/042418EQS101O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. 2005. “The Challenge of Earthquake Risk Assessment.” Seismological Research Letters 76 (4): 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.4.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. L., and Q. N. Li. 2011. “Research on Pounding Response at Expansion Joint in the Linear Bridge and the Curved Bridge Under Earthquake.” In Advanced Materials Research, 2303–2307. Vol. 255. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, M. G., J. T. Smith, S. Fotopoulou, K. Pitilakis, O. Mavrouli, J. Corominas, and S. Argyroudis. 2014. “An Expert Judgement Approach to Determining the Physical Vulnerability of Roads to Debris Flow.” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 73 (2): 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0570-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., H. S. Mha, and S. H. Kim. 2015. “Effects of the Earthquake-Induced Pounding Upon Pier Motions in the Multi-Span Simply Supported Steel Girder Bridge.” Engineering Structures 93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. S., R. DesRoches, and J. E. Padgett. 2009. “Fragility Curves for a Typical California Box Girder Bridge.” TCLEE 2009: Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multihazard Environment 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/41050(357)5.
   Google Scholar
• Yashinsky, M., R. Oviedo, S. A. Ashford, L. Fargier-Gabaldon, and M. Hube 2010. Performance of Highway and Railway Structures During the February 27, 2010 Maule Chile Earthquake. EERI/PEER. FHWA Bridge Team Report.
   Google Scholar
• Zamiri, A., M. R. Banan, and M. R. Banan. 2021. “Fragility Assessment for Horizontally Curved Reinforced Concrete Box Girder Bridges Using As-Built Data.” Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 45 (3): 1349–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00455-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, P., M. Abe, and Y. Fujino. 2004. “Evaluation of Pounding Countermeasures and Serviceability of Elevated Bridges During Seismic Excitation Using 3D Modeling.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33 (5): 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar