Capturing the Nurture approach: experiences of young pupils with SEBD

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., and J. Bowlby. 1991. “An Ethological Approach to Personality Development. ” American Psychologist 46: 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennathan, M., and M. Boxall. 1998. The Boxall Profile: Handbook for Teachers. London: The Nurture Group Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bennathan, M., and M. Boxall. 2005. Effective Intervention in Primary School: Nurture Groups. 2nd ed. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Binnie, L., and K. Allen. 2008. “Whole School Support for Vulnerable Children: The Evaluation of a Part-Time Nurture Group. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 13 (3): 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A., and J. Swain. 2000. “The Bread, the Jam and Some Coffee in the Morning: Perceptions of a Nurture Group. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 5 (3): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, M. 2002. Nurture Groups in Schools: Principles and Practice. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, E., M. Barrett, and A. Davis. 2003. “The Effect of Affective Characterizations on the Size of Children’s Drawings. ” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21: 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R. C., and S. H. Kaufman. 1972. Actions, Styles and Symbols in Kinetic Family Drawings (K-F-D). New York: Bruner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, T. 1998. “Understanding: A Pre-Requisite to Inclusion. ” In Promoting Inclusive Practice, edited by C. Tilstone, L. Florian, and R. Rose, 113–126. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, T. 2003. “Policies for Positive Behaviour Management. ” In Strategies to Promote Inclusive Practice, edited by R. Rose and C. Tilstone, 67–83. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., R. Arnold, and E. Boyd. 2001. “The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups: Preliminary Research Findings. ” British Journal of Special Education 28 (4): 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., and Y. Tiknaz. 2005. “Progress and Challenge in Nurture Groups: Evidence from Three Case Studies. ” British Journal of Special Education 32 (4): 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., and D. Whitebread. 2007. “The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups on Student Progress: Evidence from a National Research Study. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 12 (3): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. 1993. Children’s Drawings of the Human Figure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., J. Visser, T. Cole, and N. De Reybekill. 1999. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties in Mainstream Schools. Research Report No 90. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.D. 2005. “Voices from the Margins: The Perceptions of Pupils with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties about their Educational Experiences. ” In Handbook of Emotional Behavioural Difficulties, edited by P. Clough, P. Garner, J. T. Pardeck, and F. Yuen, 299–316. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2011a. Permanent and Fixed Period Exclusions from Schools in England 2009/10. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2011b. Support and Aspiration: A New Approach to Special Educational Need and Disability. A Consultation. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2001. Special Educational Needs: Code of Practice. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Di Leo, J.H. 1983. Interpreting Children’s Drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, D., and L. Fingerson. 2002. “Interviewing Children and Adolescents. ” In Handbook of Interview Research, edited by J. K. Gubrium, and J. A. Holstein, 181–202. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, W., and J. Reilly. 1996. “Drawings as a Method of Program Evaluation and Communication with School-age Children. ” Journal of Extension 34 (6): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Flutter, J. 2007. “Pupil Voice and Teacher Development. ” Educational Review Special Edition on Teacher Development 18 (3): 343–35.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research. ” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fury, G., E. A. Carlson, and L. A. Sroufe. 1997. “Children’s Representations of Attachment Relationships in Family Drawings. ” Child Development 68 (6): 1154–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. 1993. “What Disruptive Students Say about the School Curriculum and the Way It Is Taught. ” Therapeutic Care and Education 2 (2): 404–415.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, B. 2005. “City of Glasgow Nurture Group Pilot Scheme Evaluation. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 10 (4): 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Goldner, L., and M. Scharf. 2011. “Children’s Family Drawings: A Study of Attachment, Personality, and Adjustment. ” Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association 28 (1): 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, L., and D. Habenicht. 1994. “The Kinetic Family Drawing Technique: A Review of the Literature. ” Journal of Personality Assessment 62: 440–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D.B. 1963. Children’s Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity. A Revision and Extension of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. J., L. Clarke, and J. A. Ungerer. 2007. “Children’s Drawings Provide a New Perspective on Teacher-Child Relationship Quality and School Adjustment. ” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 22: 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., B. J. Thompson, and E. N. Williams. 1997. “A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research. ” The Counselling Psychologist 25: 517–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, A., J. Emanuel, and P. Farrell. 2003. “Can Nurture Groups Facilitate Inclusive Practice in Primary Schools? ” In Making Special Education Inclusive, edited by P. Farrell and M. Ainscow, 101–110. London: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hulse, W.C. 1951. “Childhood Conflict Expressed Through Family Drawings. ” Journal of Projective Techniques 16: 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• Iijma, M., O. Arisaka, F. Minamoto, and Y. Arai. 2001. “Sex Differences in Children’s Free Drawings: A Study on Females with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. ” Hormones and x 40: 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Iszatt, J., and T. Wasilewska. 1997. “NGs: An Early Intervention Model Enabling Vulnerable Children with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties to Integrate Successfully into School. ” Educational and Child Psychology 14 (3): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2001. “Experiencing Special Education. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 6 (3): 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, R.P. 2010. Children and Pictures: Drawing and Understanding. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, N., and M. Main. 1986. Instructions for the Classification of Children’s Family Drawings in Terms of Representation of Attachment. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, B., and A. Wohl. 1992. Casualities of Childhood. Bruner/Mazel: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E., and J. R. Weisz. 1998. “Identifying and Developing Empirically Supported Child and Adolescent Treatments. ” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66 (1): 19–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. 1970. Analysing Children’s Art. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Knoff, H. M., and H. T. Prout. 1985. Kinetic Drawing System for Family and School: A Handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Koppitz, E.M. 1968. Psychological Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Drawings. London: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• La Voy, S. K., W. C. Pederson, J. M. Reitz, A. A. Brauch, T. M. Luxenberg, and C. C. Nosfisnger. 2001. “Children’s Drawings: A Cross-Cultural Analysis from Japan and the United States. ” School Psychology International 22: 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levick, M. 1997. See What I’m Saying. Dubuque, IA: Islewest.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S., K. Insley, and G. Buckland. 2006. Nurture Group Principles and Curriculum Guidelines Helping Children to Achieve. London: The Nurture Group Network.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A.H. 1987. Motivation and Personality. 3rd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., L. M. Delli, and M. N. Edwards. 2004. “The Good Teacher and Good Teaching: Comparing Beliefs of Second-Grade Students, Preservice Teachers, and Inservice Teachers. ” The Journal of Experimental Education 72 (2): 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J.A. 1988. Draw A Person Test: A Quantitative Scoring System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., and S. I. Pfeiffer. 1992. “Performance of Disruptive Behaviour Disordered and Normal Samples on the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. ” Psychological Assessment 4 (2): 156–159.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N., J. Huttenlocher, A. B. Drummey, and J. G. Wiley. 1998. “The Development of Spatial Location Coding: Place Learning and Dead Reckoning in the Second and Third Years. ” Cognitive Development 13: 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurture Group Network 2012. http://www.nurturegroups.org/pages/who-we-are.html
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted 2011. Supporting children with challenging behaviour through a nurture group approach. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/supporting-children-challenging-behaviour-through-nurture-group-approach
   Google Scholar
• O’Conner, T., and J. Colwell. 2002. “The Effectiveness and Rational of the “Nurture Group” Approach to Helping Children with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties Remain within Mainstream Education. ” British Journal of Special Education 29 (2): 96–100.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M., A. Hodkinson, D. Burton, and G. Torstensson. 2011. “Pupil Voice – Educational Experiences of Young People with Behavioural, Emotional and Social Difficulties (BESD). ” Emotional and Behaviourial Difficulties 16 (3): 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• O’Kane, C. 2008. “The Development of Participatory Techniques: Facilitating Children’s Views about Decisions which Affect Them. ” In Research with Children: Perspectives and Practice 2nd Edition, edited by P. Christensen and A. James, 125–155. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, M., K. A. Kavale, S. R. Mathur, R. B. Rutherford, and S. R. Forness. 1999. “A Meta-analysis of Social Skill Interventions for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. ” Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders 7 (1): 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S., T. MacKay, and M. Kearney. 2009. “Nurture Groups: A Large-scale, Controlled Study of Effects on Development and Academic Attainment. ” British Journal of Special Education 36 (4): 204–212.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. 1996. “Listening to Children with Special Educational Needs. ” In Listening to Children in Education, edited by R. Davie and D. Galloway, 121–139. London: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. 2007. “Helping Children Thrive at School: The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups. ” Educational Psychology in Practice 23 (1): 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sellman, E. 2009. “Lessons Learned: Student Voice at a School for Pupils Experiencing Social, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. ” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 14 (1): 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Seth-Smith, F., N. Levi, R. Pratt, P. Fonagy, and D. Jaffey. 2010. “Do Nurture Groups Improve the Social, Emotional and Behavioural Functioning of at Risk Children?” Educational & Child Psychology 27 (1): 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W.B. 1993. “Quality Control in Qualitative Research. ” Clinical Psychology Review 13: 593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson, M., and K. Salmon. 2001. “Drawing and Showing: Helping Children to Report Emotionally Laden Events. ” Applied Cognitive Psychology 15: 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar