The effectiveness of nurture groups: a systematic review

References

• Bani, M. 2011. “The Use and Frequency of Verbal and Non-Verbal Praise in Nurture Groups.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 16 (1): 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bennathon, M., and M. Boxall. 1998. The Boxall Profile: Handbook for Teachers. London: Nurture Group Network.
   Google Scholar
• Binnie, L.M., and K. Allen. 2008. “Whole School Support for Vulnerable Children: The Evaluation of a Part-time Nurture Group.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 13 (3): 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1969. Attachment and Loss, Vol.1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1980. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss, Sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, M. 2002. Nurture Groups: Principles and Practice. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P.C. 1998. “Measuring Behavioural Indicators of Self-esteem in the Classroom.” Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 37 (2): 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P.C. 1999. “Behavioural Indicators of Self-esteem.” Accessed November 22, 2012.http://eprints.qut.edu.au/26835/2/26835.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cefai, C., and P. Cooper. 2011. “The Introduction of Nurture Groups in Maltese Schools: A Method of Promoting Inclusion Education.” British Journal of Special Education 38 (2): 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, D. 2009. “Nurture Groups in Secondary Schools.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 14 (4): 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, J., and T. O‘Connor. 2003. “Understanding Nurturing Practices: A Comparison of the Use of Strategies Likely to Enhance Self-esteem in Nurture Groups and Normal Classrooms.” British Journal of Special Education 30 (3): 119–124.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, C., J. Yeomans, and J. Parkes. 2008. “The Oasis: Nurture Group Provision for Key Stage 3 Pupils.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 13 (4): 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., and D. Whitebread. 2007. “The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups on Student Progress: Evidence from a National Research Study.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 12 (3): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., R. Arnold, and E. Boyd. 2001. “The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups: Preliminary Research Findings.” British Journal of Special Education 28 (4): 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T., and R.R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, C., P. Cooper, and E. Royer. 2011. “A Study of the Concurrent Validity Between the Boxall Profile and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.” The International Journal of Emotional Education 3 (1): 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools & Families. 2008. Targeted Mental Health in Schools Project: Using the Evidence to Inform Your Approach: A Practical Guide for Headteachers and Commissioners. London: Central Office of Information.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools & Families. 2009. Healthy Child Programme: From 5–19 years old. London: Central Office of Information.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2005. Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL): Improving Behaviour, Improving Learning. London: Central Office of Information.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education 2010. “The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper.” [online]. Accessed December 3, 2012 https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/CM-7980.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 2003. “Every Child Matters.” https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/DfES/1081/2004#downloadableparts. Accessed 3 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 1994, 2001. Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: Central Office of Information.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, S.H., and N. Black. 1998. “The Feasibility of Creating a Checklist for the Assessment of the Methodological Quality Both of Randomised and Non-randomised Studies of Health care Interventions.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52 (6): 377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, R. 2003. “Developing the Nurturing School: Spreading NG Principles and Practices into Mainstream Classrooms.” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 8 (4): 253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, R. 2005. “‘I hate you, please help me: A Case Study from a Classic Boxall Nurture Group.” Pastoral Care 23 (1): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, B. 2005. “City of Glasgow Nurture Group Pilot Scheme Evaluation.” Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 10 (4): 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. 1981a. “Language and Individual Differences: The Search for Universals in Personality Lexicons.” In Review of personality and social psychology, Volume 2, edited by L. Wheeler, 141–165. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. 1981b. “Developing a Taxonomy of Trait-descriptive Terms.” In Problems with Language Imprecision: New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, edited by D.W. Fiske, 43–65. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. 1998. “The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).” [online]. Accessed October 17, 2012 http://www.sdqinfo.com.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. 2001. “Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 40 (11): 1337–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., H. Meltzer, and V. Bailey. 1998. “The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Pilot Study on the Validity of the Self-report Version.” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 7 (3): 125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, T. 1999. “Baseline Assessment in Scotland.” Journal of Research in Reading 22 (1): 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, T. 2006. The West Dunbartonshire Literacy Initiative: The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Intervention Strategy to Raise Achievement and Eradicate Illiteracy. Phase 1 Research Report. Dunbarton: West Dunbartonshire Council.
   Google Scholar
• Minds, Y. 2012. “Early Intervention Is Vital.” [online]. Accessed October 14. http://www.youngminds.org.uk/about/whats_the_problem
   Google Scholar
• Muris, P., C. Meesters, and F. van der Berg. 2003. “The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Further Evidence for Its Reliability and Validity in a Community Sample of Dutch Children and Adolescents.” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 12 (1): 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2008. “Social and Emotional Wellbeing in Primary Education: Full Guidance.” [online]. Accessed December 20, 2012. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/PH12/Guidance/pdf/English
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2009. “Social and Emotional Wellbeing in Secondary Education: Full Guidance.” [online]. Accessed December 20, 2012. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/PH20/Guidance/pdf/English
   Google Scholar
• Nurture Group Network. 2010. “Who we are.” Accessed October 12, 2012. http://www.nurturegroups.org/pages/who-we-are.html
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T., and J. Colwell. 2002. “The Effectiveness and Rationale of the ‘Nurture Group’ Approach to Helping Children with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties Remain Within Mainstream Education.” British Journal of Special Education 29 (2): 96–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2011. Supporting Children with Challenging Behaviour Through a Nurture Group Approach. Manchester: Crown Copyright.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S., T. MacKay, and M. Kearney. 2009. “Nurture Groups: A Large-Scale, Controlled Study of Effects on Development and Academic Attainment.” British Journal of Special Education 36 (4): 204–212.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. 2007. “Helping Children Thrive at School: The Effectiveness of Nurture Groups.” Educational Psychology in Practice 23 (1): 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K., and A. Lee. 2009. “Beyond the ‘Classic’ Nurture Group Model: An Evaluation of Part-Time and Cross-Age Nurture Groups in a Scottish Local Authority.” Support for Learning 24 (1): 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Seth-Smith, F., N. Levi, R. Pratt, P. Fonagy, and D. Jaffey. 2010. “Do Nurture Groups Improve the Social, Emotional and Behavioural Functioning of at Risk Children?.” Educational & Child Psychology 27 (1): 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D.J. 2001. “Toward an Interpersonal Neurobiology of the Developing Mind: Attachment Relationships, “mindsight”, and Neural Integration.” Infant Mental Health Journal 22 (1–2): 67–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Children Act. 2004. Accessed November 15, 2012 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31/contents
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, D.J. 2007. Attachment in Psychotherapy. : New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar