English schooling and little e and big E exclusion: what’s equity got to do with it?

References

• Adams, R. (2021, April 8). ”Experts Reject Claim Covid Has Worsened Behaviour in English Schools.” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M. 1999. Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ashenden, D., J. Blackburn, B. Hannan, and D. White. 1984. “Manifesto for a Democratic Curriculum.” The Australian Teacher 7: 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2000. “Policy as Discourse: What Does It Mean? Where Does It Get Us?” Discourse 21 (1): 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest NSW: Pearson Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., and J. Bonham. 2014. “Reclaiming Discursive Practices as an Analytic Focus.” Foucault Studies 17 (April): 173–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2013. Exploring ADHD: An Ethnography of Disorder in Early Childhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2018. The Education Debate. third ed. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. 2021. “Is It Really about the Evidence? Argument, Persuasion, and the Power of Ideas in Cultural Policy.” Cultural Trends 1–18. doi:10.1080/09548963.2021.1991230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K., and M. Myers. 2018. Home Schooling and Home Education. Race, Class and Inequality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Justice. 2020. Warming the Cold Spots of Alternative Provision Education in England. A Manifesto for System Improvement. Westminister: Centre for Social Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Schools Commission. 1985. Quality and Equality. Commonwealth Specific Purpose Programs for Australian Schools. Canberra: AGPS.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Schools Commission Disadvantaged Schools Programme. 1978. Disadvantaged Schools Programme. Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., D. Ashenden, S. Kessler, and G. Dowsett. 1982. Making the Difference. Schools, Families and Social Divisions. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Danechi, S. (2019). ”Briefing Paper: Alternative Provision Education in England.”Accessed 7 June 2020: House of Commons. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8522/
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2012. Exclusion from Maintained Schools, Academies, and Pupil Referral Units in England. London: Department for Education. www.education,gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2018). Creating opportunity for all: Our vision for alternative provision Yougov. Accessed 18 October 21: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/713665/Creating_opportunity_for_all_-_AP_roadmap.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2019. The Timpson Review of School Exclusion. London: Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/807862/Timpson_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2020). ”Permanent Exclusions and Suspensions in England: Academic Year 2018/2019.” Accessed 18 October 21. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-in-england/2018-19yougov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2021). ”Permanent Exclusions and Suspensions in England: Academic Year 2019/2020. Permanent Exclusions and Suspensions in England, Academic Year 2019/20 – Explore Education Statistics – GOV.UK.” Accessed 18 October 21. explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Done, E., and H. Knowler. 2021. “‘Off-rolling” and Foucault’s Art Os visibility/invisibility: A Exploratory Study of Senior Leaders’ Views of ‘Strategic” School Exclusions in Southwest England.” British Educational Research Journal 47 (4): 1039–1055. doi:10/1002/berj.3709.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., and J. Tinkler. 2020. Maximising the Impacts of Academic Research. London: PalgraveMacmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, H. 1984. Contemporary Feminist Thought. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge, Trans. A. Sheridan, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. “Politics and the Study of Discourse.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 53–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, N., and T. Cline. 2009. Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diverstiy. 2nd ed. ed. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gazeley, L., T. Marrable, C. Brown, and J. Boddy. 2013. Reducing Inequalities in School Exclusion: Learning from Good Practice. A Report to the Office of the Children’s Commissioner for the Centre for Innovation and Research in Childhood and Youth. Brighton: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, K. (2017). ”Making the Difference: Breaking the Link between School Exclusion and Social Exclusion.” Institute for Public Policy Research. https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/making-the-difference
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V. 2016. Pushed to the Edge. Inclusion and Behaviour Support in Schools. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. second ed. ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M., and A. Booth. 2009. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information and Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. 2002. “Narrowing the Breach; Can Disability Culture and Full Educational Inclusion Be Reconciled? .” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 13 (3): 144–152. doi:10.1177/10442073020130030201.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, V. 2005. Diagnosing ‘Disorderly’ Children. A Critique of Behaviour Disorder Discourses. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, R. (1986). ”Student Participation and the Participation and Equity Programme.” (PEP discussion paper,no. 2). Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IFF Research Ltd, Mills, M., & Thomson, P. 2018. Investigative Research into Alternative Provision. London: Government Social Research. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/748910/Investigative_research_into_alternative_provision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education (University of London) and the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). 2014. School Exclusion Trial Evaluation. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, J. M., Ed. 2020. On Educational Inclusion: Meanings, History, Issues and International Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A., and S. R. Forness. 2000. “History, Rhetoric and Reality: Analysis of the Inclusion Debate.” Remedial and Special Education 21 (5): 279–296. doi:10.1177/074193250002100505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, S., A. Wilkin, K. Kinder, C. Gulliver, J. Harland, K. Martin, and R. White. 2007. Effective Alternative Provision. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., and K. Willis. 1993. “The Education of Girls Unit, S. A.” In Telling Tales. Girls and Schools Changing Their Ways. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., S. Willis, J. Blackmore, and L. Rennie. 1997. Answering Back. Girls, Boys and Feminism in Schools. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Komesaroff, L. R., and M. McLean. 2006. “Being There Is Not Enough: Inclusion Is Both Deaf and Hearing.” Deafness and Education Internaitonal 8 (2): 88–100. doi:10.1179/146431506790560210.
   Google Scholar
• Lauchlan, F., and S. Greig. 2015. “Educational Inclusion in England: Origins, Perspectives and Current Drrections.” Support for Learning 30 (1): 69–82. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.12075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., J. Knight, and P. Porter, Eds. 1993. Schooling Reform in Hard Times. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, D. K., and A. Gartner. 1997. Inclusion and School Reform. Transforming America’s Classrooms. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G., Ed. 2005. Problem Girls. Understanding and Supporting Troubled and Troublesome Girls and Young Women. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loxley, J. 2007. Performativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MIddleton, G. 2021. “Gavin Williamson Urges Schools to Crack down on Discipline and Mobile Phone Use after Lockdown ‘Inevitably’ Affected Pupils.” The Independent.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M. 2004. “Male Teachers, Homophobia, Misogyny and Teacher Education.” Teaching Education 15 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1080/1047621042000179970.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., and G. McGregor. 2014. Re-engaging Young People in Education. Learning from Alternative Schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OfSTED. 2011. Alternative Provision. Manchester: OfSTED.
   Google Scholar
• OfSTED. 2013. Pupils Missing Out on Education. Low Aspirations, Little Access, Limited Achievement. Manchester: OfSTED.
   Google Scholar
• Ogg, T., and E. Kail. 2010. A New Secret Garden? Alternative Provision, Exclusion and Children’s Rights. London: Civitas.
   Google Scholar
• Osler, A., and K. Vincent. 2003. Girls and Exclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osler, A. 2006. “Excluded Girls: Interpersonal, Institutional and Structural Violence in Schooling.” Gender and Education 18 (6): 571–589. doi:10.1080/09540250600980089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. 2011. Strategic Alternatives to Exclusion from School. 2nd ed. Stoke: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Penfield, T., M. J. Baker, R. Scoble, and M. C. Wykes. 2014. “Assessment, Evaluations and Definitions of Research Impact. A Review.” Research Evaluation 23 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrie, A., G. Macleod, M. A. Cullen, and G. McCluskey. 2009. ”Where Next for Pupils Excluded from Special Schools and Pupil Referral Units?.” Department for Children, Schools and Families. www.dcsf.gov.uk/research
   Google Scholar
• Pupil Inclusion Network Scotland. (2012). ”Pupil Inclusion Network Scotland Exclusions in Scotland’s Schools: One Year On, Where are We Now?.” Pupil Inclusion Network. http://www.pinscotland.org/assets/main-pdfs/PINS-Exclusions-Seminars-Report2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2018. The Research Impact Handbook. 2nd ed. ed. London: Fast Track Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Schools Commission. 1975. Girls, School and Society. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Schools Council. 1993. In the Middle. Schooling for Young Adolescents. Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 1995. Changing Theories and Practices of Discipline. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 1998. “Inclusive Education? This Must Signify ‘New Times’ in Educational Research.” British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (4): 440–454. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproston, K., F. Sedgewick, and L. Crane. 2017. “Autistic Girls and School Exclusion. Perspectives of Students and Their Parents.” Autism & Developmental Language Impariments 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941517706172
   Google Scholar
• Tawell, A., and G. McCluskey. 2021. “Utilising Bacchi’s Whats the Problem Represented to Be? (WPR) Approach to Analyse National School Exclusion Policy in England and Scotland: A Worked Example.” International Journal of Research and Methods in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1976750
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., and L. Russell. 2007. Mapping the Provision of Alternatives to School Exclusion. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., and J. Pennacchia. 2014. ”What’s the Alternative? Effective Support for Young People Disengaging from Mainstream Education.” Princes Trust. http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/pdf/whats-the-alternative-effective-support-for-young-people.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, K. 2012. Schoolgirl Pregnancy, Motherhood and Education: Dealing with Difference. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C., P. Standen, G. John, G. German, and T. Patel. 2005. School Exclusion and Transition into Adulthood in African-Caribbean Communities. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. 1993. The Education of Girls: Policy, Research and the Question of Gender. Melbourne: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Yeatman, A. 1990. Bureaucrats, Technocrats, Femocrats: Essays on the Contemporary Australian State. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar