437
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Collective skill formation: a historical analysis of the least-likely case New Zealand

Pages 135-155 | Received 10 Jun 2013, Accepted 11 Feb 2014, Published online: 21 Mar 2014

References

  • Abbott, Malcolm. 2000. “The Development of Vocational Education and Training in New Zealand.” Education Research and Perspectives 27 (1): 90–108.
  • “Apprentices, Liability of Employers, Important Amendments of Law Suggested, Deputation to Ministers.” 1918. Evening Post XCX (35): 4, 9 February.
  • “Apprenticeship Conference: Condensed Reports of Proceedings.” 1929. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1929 H-11A.
  • “Apprenticeship Question”. 1923. Conference of Representatives of Employers, Workers, The Education Department and the Department of Labour. Wellington: Government Printer.
  • “Apprenticeship, Remodelling the Law, Trades Council’s Proposals.” 1917. Evening Post XCIV (3): 8, 4 July.
  • Belshaw, Horace. 1933. “Agricultural Labour in New Zealand.” International Labour Review 26: 26–45.
  • British Overseas (British Overseas Settlement Delegation to New Zealand). 1924. “Report of the British Overseas Settlement Delegation to New Zealand, 1923.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1924 I-A-7.
  • Brooking, Tom. 1981. “Economic Transformation.” In The Oxford History of New Zealand, edited by H. William Oliver, and R. Bridget Williams, 226–249. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Busemeyer Marius, R., and Christine Trampusch. 2012. “Introduction: The Comparative Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, edited by R. Marius Busemeyer, and Christine Trampusch, 3–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • CIARM (Commission of Inquiry into Apprenticeship and Related Matters). 1945. “Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Apprenticeship and Related Matters.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1945 H-11B.
  • Collier, David, Henry E. Brady, and Jason Seawright. 2004. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 229–266. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Crouch, Crouch, David Finegold, and Mari Sako. 1999. Are Skills the Answer? The Political Economy of Skill Creation in Advanced Industrial Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Deissinger, Thomas, Erica Smith, and Richard Pickersgill. 2006. “Models of Full-time and Part-time Vocational Training for School-leavers: A Comparison between Germany and Australia.” International Journal of Training Research 4: 30–50. doi: 10.5172/ijtr.4.1.30.
  • DoE (Department of Education). 1917. “Education: Technical Education.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1917 I-E-05.
  • DoE (Department of Education). 1924. “Education: Technical Education.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1924 I-E-05.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1918. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives I-II-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1919. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1919 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1920. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1920 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1925. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1925 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1926. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1926 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1927. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1926 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1928. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1928 I-H-11.
  • DoL (Department of Labour). 1929. “Report of the Department of Labour.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1929 I-H-11.
  • Eckstein, Harry H. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by I. Fred Greenstein and W. Nelson Polsby, 79–138. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Elbaum, Bernard. 1989. “Why Apprenticeship Persisted in Britain but not in the United States.” XLIX (2): 337–349.
  • “Examinations for Apprentices. The Work of the Trades Certification Board.” 1954. Labour and Employment Gazette 4 (3): 29–30.
  • Finegold, David, and David Soskice. 1988. “The Failure of Training in Britain: Analysis and Prescription.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 4 (3): 21–53. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/4.3.21.
  • Franks, Peter. 2001. Prints and Politics. A History of Trade Unions in the New Zealand Printing Industry, 1865–1995. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
  • Gonon, Philipp, and Markus Maurer. 2012. “Educational Policy Actors as Stakeholders in the Development of the Collective Skill System: The Case of Switzerland.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, edited by R. Marius Busemeyer and Christine Trampusch, 126–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gospel, Howard. 1994. “The Survival of Apprenticeship Training: A British, American, Australian Comparison.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 32 (4): 505–522. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.1994.tb01048.x.
  • Graham, Jeannie. 1987. “Child Employment in New Zealand.” New Zealand Journal of History 21 (1): 62–78.
  • Holt, James. 1986. Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand. The First Forty Years. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Howells, John M. 1970. “Concentration and Growth in New Zealand Unions, 1900–1966.” Journal of Industrial Relations 12 (1): 39–51. doi: 10.1177/002218567001200104.
  • Kappert, Peter. 1997. “Educational Utopia? The New Zealand Standards Approach Considered in the Light of the German Experience in Vocational Training.” PhD diss., Victoria University of Wellington.
  • Kuiper Alison, C. 2002. “Education for Occupational Change: A Study of Institutional Retraining in New Zealand.” Doctoral Thesis, Lincoln University.
  • Labour Bills Committee. 1894. “Minutes of Evidence Taken before the Committee in the Matter of the Master and Apprentice Bill No. 2, together with Appendices.” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1894 I-13. 22 October.
  • Labour Bills Committee. 1898. Appendix of the Legislative Council: Master and Apprentice Bill No. 6, 2 February.
  • “Labour Laws, Drastic Changes, Minister’s Intention, Apprentice Problem.” 1935. Evening Post 156: 8, 30 December.
  • Lee, B. C. 1970. “The Development of Technical Institutes in New Zealand.” The New Zealand Journal of Public Administration 32 (2): 1–31.
  • Mabbett, Deborah. 1995. Trade, Employment, and Welfare: A Comparative Study of Trade and Labour Market Policies in Sweden and New Zealand, 1880–1980. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Mahoney, James, and A. Kathleen Thelen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, John E. 1996. Holding the Balance. A History of New Zealand’s Department of Labour 1891–1995. Wellington: Canterbury University Press.
  • Murray, Nicky. 2001. “A History of Apprenticeship in New Zealand.” PhD diss., Lincoln University.
  • “New Zealand Apprenticeship Committees.” 1951. Labour and Employment Gazette 1 (1): 17–18.
  • Olssen, Erik. 1995. Building the New World. Works Politics and Society in Caversham 1880s–1920s. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ryan, Paul. 2000. “The Institutional Requirements of Apprenticeship: Evidence From Smaller EU Countries.” International Journal of Training and Development 4 (1): 42–65. doi:10.1111/1468-2419.00095.
  • Ryan, Shaun. 2010. “Class, Skill and Control in a Southern City: The Case of the Dunedin Branch of the ASE c. 1880–1920.” Labour History 99 (1): 77–96.
  • Shields, John. 1995. “A Matter of Skill: The Revival of Apprenticeship in Early Twentieth-Century NSW.” The Journal of Industrial Relations 37 (2): 236–262.
  • Spencer, Frederick H. 1939. A Report on the Technical Education in Australia and New Zealand. New York: Carnegie.
  • Strathdee, Rob. 2003. “The ‘Third Way’ and Vocational Education and Training in New Zealand.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 4 (1): 31–48.
  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stromback, Thorsten. 2006. By Chance or Choice: The Regulation of the Apprenticeship System in Australia, 1900–1930. The Centre for Labour Market Research: Curtin University of Technology.
  • Sung, Johnny, Arwen Raddon, and David Ashton. 2006. Skills Abroad: A Comparative Assessment of International Policy Approaches to Skills Leading to the Development of Policy Recommendations for the UK. Sector Skills Development Agency Research Report 16 May 2006. Leicester: University of Leicester/Centre for Labour Market Studies.
  • “The Making of Apprenticeship Orders.” 1953. Labour and Employment Gazette 3 (2): 8.
  • “The Master and Apprentice Bill.” 1898. Press LV (10208): 4, 2 December.
  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve. The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, The United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge Uiversity Press.
  • Toner, Philip. 2008. “Survival and Decline of the Apprenticeship System in the Australian and UK Construction Industries.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 46 (3): 413–438.
  • Tucker, R. 1941. “The Court of Arbitration in New Zealand. The Evolution of a Legislature.” Economic Record 17 (32): 46–56.
  • Tyndall, Arthur. 1960. “The New Zealand System of Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration.” International Labor Review 82: 138–162.
  • “Trade and Labour Notes.” 1918. Auckland Star XLIX (63): 8, 14 March.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.