Effects of formative assessment programmes on teachers’ knowledge about supporting students’ reflection

References

• Airasian, P., A. Gullickson, L. Hahn, and D. Farland. 1995. Teacher Self-evaluation: The Literature in Perspective. Kalamazoo: Center for Research of Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., D. Boud, and J. Sampson. 1996. Learning Contracts. London and New York: Routledge Farmer.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, P., and M. James. 2014. “Exploring Formative Assessment in Primary School Classrooms: Developing a Framework of Actions and Strategies.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26 (2): 153–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asselin, M. E. 2011. “Narrative Reflection: A Method for Learning through Practice.” Journal for Nurses in Staff Development 27 (1): 2–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0b013e3181b1ba1a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkins, S., and K. Murphy. 1993. “Reflection: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 18 (8): 1188–1192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18081188.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baert, H., K. De Witte, and K. G. Sterck. 2000. Vorming, Training En Opleiding. Handboek Voor Een Kwaliteitsvol VTO-beleid in Welzijnsvoorzieningen [Instruction, Training and Education (ITE). Handbook for a High Quality ITE-policy in Welfare Services]. Leuven: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Bakkenes, I., J. D. Vermunt, and T. Wubbels. 2010. “Teacher Learning in the Context of Educational Innovation: Learning Activities and Learning Outcomes of Experienced Teachers.” Learning and Instruction 20 (6): 533–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D., and N. Verloop. 1996. “Assessing Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 22 (3): 275–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(96)00016-8.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education 5 (1): 7–71.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., P. Cressey, and P. Dochtery. 2006. “Setting the Scene for Productive Reflection.” In Productive Reflection at Work, edited by D. Boud, P. Cressy, and P. Dochtery, 3–10. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. 1997. “Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide.” TheJournal of the Learning Sciences 6 (3): 271–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. 2012. “Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 24 (2): 205–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and K. M. Zeichner. 2005. Studying Teacher Education. The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Washington, DC: AERA and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• De Eça, M., and T. Torres. 2005. “Using Portfolios for External Assessment: An Experiment in Portugal.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 24 (2): 209–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Degner, S., and H. Gruber. 2011. “Persons in the Shadow: How Guidance Works in the Acquisition of Expertise.” In The Politics of Empathy. New Interdisciplinary Perspectives on an Ancient Phenomenon, edited by B. Weber, E. Marsal, and T. Dobashi, 103–116. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker-Groen, A. M., M. F. Van der Schaaf, and K. M. Stokking. 2013. “A Teacher Competence Development Programme for Supporting Students’ Reflection Skills.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 19 (2): 150–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Towards Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellström, P. E. 2001. “Integrating Learning and Work: Conceptual Issues and Critical Conditions.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 12 (4): 421–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1006.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., and M. Kozhevnikova. 2011. “Styles of Practice: How Learning Is Affected by Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Beliefs, Conceptions and Approaches to Learning.” Research Papers in Education 26 (2): 133–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.561973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. 1971. “Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement among Many Raters.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (5): 378–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M., A. Porter, L. Desimone, B. Birman, and K. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (3): 915–945. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F., P. Sleegers, R. Van den Berg, and G. Kelchtermans. 2001. “Conditions Fostering the Implementation of Large-scale Innovation Programs in Schools: Teachers’ Perspectives.” Educational Administration Quarterly 37 (1): 130–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. 2000. “Using Habermas to Evaluate Two Approaches to Negotiated Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (3): 293–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050135158.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, F., R. J. Vallerand, and C. Blanchard. 2000. “On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS).” Motivation and Emotion 24 (3): 175–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., K. Sheingold, and C. M. Myford. 1998. “Reasoning about Evidence in Portfolios: Cognitive Foundations for Valid and Reliable Assessment.” Educational Assessment 5 (1): 5–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0501_1.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., K. R. Daehler, N. Wong, M. S. Shinohara, and L. W. Miratrix. 2012. “Differential Effects of Three Professional Development Models on Teacher Knowledge and Student Achievement in Elementary Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (3): 333–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In de Wal, J., P. J. den Brok, J. G. Hooijer, and R. L. Martens. 2014. “Teachers’ Engagement in Professional Learning: Exploring Motivational Profiles.” Learning and Individual Differences 36: 27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., H. Westbroek, and W. Doyle. 2015. “Practicality Studies: How to Move from What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 24 (1): 176–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.954751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., and P. A. Cranton. 1997. “Teaching as Scholarship: A Model for Instructiona Development.” Issues and Inquiry in College Learning and Teaching 19 (2): 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., and P. A. Cranton. 2000. “Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching.” Journal of Higher Education 71: 476–495. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2649149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., F. Dochy, and H. Nijs. 2009. “Learning Conditions for Non-formal and Informa Workplace Learning.” Journal for Workplace Learning 21 (5): 369–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620910966785.
   Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., and K. Børte. 2019. “Trapped between Accountability and Professional Learning? School Leaders and Teacher Evaluation.” Professional Development in Education 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585384.
   Google Scholar
• Louws, M. L., J. A. Meirink, K. van Veen, and J. H. van Driel. 2017. “Exploring the Relation between Teachers’ Perceptions of Workplace Conditions and Their Professional Learning Goals.” Professional Development in Education 43 (5): 770–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1251486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustick, D. 2011. Certifiable: Teaching, Learning and National Board Certification. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lusttick, D., and G. Sykes. 2006. “National Board Certification as Professional Development: What are Teachers Learning?” Education Policy Analysis Archives. 14: 5. Retrieved 10 August 2006 from http:/epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n5
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R., P. Mannix McNamara, and N. Seery. 2012. “Promoting Deep Learning in a Teacher Education Program through Self- and Peer-assessment and Feedback.” European Journal of Teacher Education 35 (2): 179–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, K., J. Gordon, and A. MacLeod. 2009. “Reflection and Reflective Practice in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review.” Advances in Health Sciences Education, Theory and Practice 14 (4): 595–621. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. 2013. “Identifying the Characteristics of Written Formative Feedback Used by Assessors in Work-based Qualifications.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 65 (1): 18–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2012.727855.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. 2012. “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.11613/issn.1846-7482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirink, J. A., P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop. 2007. “A Closer Look at Teachers’ Individual Learning in Collaborative Settings.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13 (2): 145–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152496.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterbaan, A. E., M. F. Van der Schaaf, L. K. J. Baartman, and K. Stokking. 2010. “Reflection during Portfolio-based Conversations.” International Journal of Educational Research 49 (4): 151–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Y. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum Implementation.” American Education Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 2006. “All about Accountability/phony Formative Assessments: Buyer Beware.” Educational Leadership 64 (3): 86–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., P. Youngs, and A. Odden. 2001. “Advances in Teacher Assessment and Their Uses.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by V. Richardson, 259–297. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. W., and K. M. Savoy-Levine. 1998. “Contingent Tutoring of Long-division Skills in Fourth and Fifth Graders: Experimental Tests of Some Hypotheses about Scaffolding.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 19 (2): 287–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)80041-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., and C. D. Bruce. 2007. “Teacher Self-assessment: A Mechanism for Facilitating Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (2): 146–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and E. M. Furtak. 2007. “Exploring Teachers’ Informal Formative Assessment Practices and Students’ Understanding in the Context of Scientific Inquiry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 57–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, P., and K. Sanders. 2013. “Implementing Human Resources Management (HRM) within Dutch VET Institutions: Examining the Fostering and Hindering Factors.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 65 (2): 236–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.783612.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being.” American Psychologist 55: 68–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., R. C. Wei, and L. Darling-Hammond. 2008. “Improving Teachers’ Assessment Practices through Professional Development: The Case of National Board Certification.” American Educational Research Journal 45 (3): 669–700. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1998. “Toward a Theory of Teaching-in-context.” Issues in Education 4 (1): 1–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15: 4–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R., and J. Chappuis. 2005. “Using Student-involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps.” Theory into Practice 44 (1): 11–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. N., and H. K. Burns. 2008. “Reflections: An Essential Element of Evidence-based Practice.” Journal of Emergency Nursing 34 (3): 246–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2008.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigelaar, D., P. Sins, and J. van Driel. 2017. “Fostering Students’ Reflection: Examining Relations between Elements of Teachers’ Knowledge.” Research Papers in Education 32 (3): 353–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlenbeck, A. M., N. Verloop, and D. Beijaard. 2002. “Requirements for an Assessment Procedure for Beginning Teachers: Implications from Recent Theories on Teaching and Assessment.” Teacher College Record 104 (2): 242–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J. 1997. “Toward a Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by M. P. Zanna, 271–360. Vol. 29. San Diego: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2011. “Patterns of Contingent Teaching in Teacher-student Interaction.” Learning and Instruction 21 (1): 46–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh, L., A. Ros, and D. Beijaard. 2014. “Improving Teacher Feedback during Active Learning: Effects of a Professional Development Program.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (4): 772–809. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Diggelen, M., P. J. den Brok, and D. Beijaard. 2013. “Teachers’ Use of a Self-assessment Procedure: The Role of Criteria, Standards, Feedback and Reflection.” Teachers and Teaching 19 (2): 115–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., and A. Berry. 2010. “The Teacher Education Knowledge Base: Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd. Vol. 7. B. McGraw, P. L. Peterson, and E. Baker, edited by. 656–661. Oxford:Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Verberg, C. P. M., D. E. H. Tigelaar, and N. Verloop. 2013. “Teacher Learning through Participation in a Negotiated Assessment Procedure.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 19 (2): 172–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloop, N., J. H. Van Driel, and P. C. Meijer. 2001. “Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 35 (5): 441–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
   Google Scholar