An evaluation of the responsiveness of a comprehensive set of outcome measures for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries

References

• Grealy MA, Heffernan D. The rehabilitation of brain injured children: The case for including physical exercise and virtual reality. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2001;4:41–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell N, Johnson P, Schuller R, Jutai J. Evaluationof a computer-based program for the remediation of cognitive- communication skill. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1994;9:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH. Pediatric functionaloutcome measures. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 1991;2:689–723.
   Google Scholar
• Lollar DJ, Simeonsson R, Nanda U. Measures of outcomesfor children and youth. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;81:S46–S52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrzykowski EA. The methodology of outcomemeasurement. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997;11:27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Forer S. Outcomes evaluation in subacute care. Rehabilitation Management 1995;8:138–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer JE. Neurobehavioral outcomes and their determinants. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995;10:74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K, Cope ND. The benefit of rehabilitation in traumaticbrain injury: A literature review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995;10:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Jaffe KM, Polissar NL, Liao S, Oddson B. Written language production and neuropsychological function in children with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 1997;78:1096–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk M. Early development-related conditions. In: FuhrerMJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brooks; 1997. p 367–92.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell N, Wright V, Rumney, Johnson P, Oddson B, Brimblecombe P. Outcome measurement in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Canadian Association of Speech- Language Pathologists and Audiologists (CASLPA) annual conference, 27 April, Vancouver, BC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological prob-lems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997;50:869–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1997;79:298–305.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels T, Verrips GHW, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Fekkes M, Kamphuis RP, Koopman HM, Theunissen NCM, Wit JM. Measuring health-related quality of life in children: The development of the TACQOL parent form. Quality of Life Research 1998;7:457–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Bushnik T, Zafonte RD. Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the functional independence measure and the disability rating scale. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001;16:318–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C, High WJ, Jr. Functional outcome for traumatic brain injury: Unidimensional or multidimensional? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;5:105–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinetz CA, Warren RW, Berseth CL, Aday LA, Sachdeva R, Kirkland RT. Health status of children with special health care needs: Measurement issues and instruments. Clinical Pediatrics 1999;38:525–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine BR, Pless IB, Friedman DS, Montes JL. TheWeeFIM instrument: Its utility in detecting change in children with developmental disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;79:412–20.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce W, Gowland C, Rosenbaum P, Lane M, Plews N, Goldsmith C, Russell D, Wright V, Zdrobor S, Harding D. The Gross Motor Performance Measure: Validity and responsiveness of a measure of quality of movement. Physical Therapy 1995; 75:603–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K. Choosing and using outcome assessment tools. Annual Williamsburg Conference: Practical Strategies for Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes, 11 June, Williamsburg, PA; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• van der Putten J, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1999;66:480–84.
   Google Scholar
• Long AF, Dixon P. Monitoring outcomes in routine clinical practice: Defining appropriate measurement criteria. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1996;2:71–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson C, Watt J, Joffe A, Murphy DB, Nagy JM, McLean DE, Pain KS, Saunders LD. Childhood morbidity after severe traumatic brain injury: Increased detection with the Multiattribute Health Status Classification. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2001;2:145–50.
   Google Scholar
• Landraf JM, Abetz L. Influences of sociodemographic characteristics on parental reports of children’s physical and psychosocial well-being: Early experiences with the Child Health Questionnaire. In: Drotar D, editor. Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates; 1996. p 105–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Mann N, High JR, Wright J, Kreutzer JS, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: Ceiling effects of the FIM, FIMþFAM, DRS, and CIQ. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996;11:27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C. Outcomes that matter [Editorial]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 1995;37:753–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. Journal of Rheumatology 1995;22:1191–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May L. The challenge of measuring change: Responsiveness of outcome measurements. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1997;10:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Murawski MM, Miederhoff PA. On the generalizability of statistical expressions of health related quality of life instru- ment responsiveness: A data synthesis. Quality of Life Research 1998;7:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frytak J. Measurement. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes2000;4:15–31.
   Google Scholar
• ICIDH-2: International classification of functioning, disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. The author of this publication the World Health Organization 54th World Health Assembly (A54/18); Report by Secretariat. This publication can also be retrieved online at www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA54/ea5418.pdf. Accessed 8 February, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenteri S, Morgan SB. Adaptive and intellectual func- tioning in autistic and nonautistic retarded children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1996;64:356–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell G, Dockrell J, Rehman H. Community care for people with challenging behaviours and mild learning disability: An evaluation of an assessment and treatment unit. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1995;34:383–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggio DJ, Massingale TW. Comparison of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales—survey form and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with infants evaluated for developmental delay. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1993;77:931–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelker S, Shore D, Hakim-Larson J, Bruner D. Discrepancies in parent and teacher ratings of adaptive behavior of children with multiple disabilities. Mental Retardation 1997;35:10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bragg RM, Klockars AJ, Berninger VW. Comparison of families with and without adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992;7:94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman SB, Levin H, Matefka J, Harward H, Kufera J. Discourse ability in children with brain injury: Correlations with psychosocial, linguistic and cognitive factors. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995;10:36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM, Ewing-Cobbs L, Miner ME, Levin HS, Eisenberg HM. Behavioral changes after closed head injury in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990;58:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM, Levin HS, Lachar D, Kusnerik L, Harward H, Mendelsohn D, Lilly MA. Behavioral outcomes after pediatric closed head injury: Relationships with age, severity and lesion size. Journal of Child Neurology 1996;11:283–90.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measuring health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 1989;10:407–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russell DJ, Rosenbaum P, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The Gross Motor Function Measure: A means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1989;31:341–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Task force on treatment outcome/cost effectiveness. National treatment outcome data collection project. Rockland, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch A, Braun S, Granger CV. The functional indepen- dence measure (FIMTM instrument). Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997;1:67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Haley S. The pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI). Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement 1997;1:61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zivani J, Ottenbacher KJ, Shephard K, Foreman S, Astbury W, Ireland P. Concurent validity of the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM) and the pediatric evaluation of disabilities inventory in children with developmental disabilities and acquired brain injuries. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 2001;21:91–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumas HM, Haley SM, Rabin JP. Short-term durability and improvement of function in traumatic brain injury: A pilot study using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI) classification levels. Brain Injury 2001;15:891–902.
   Google Scholar
• Tokcan GA, Haley SM, Gill-Body KMC, Dumas HM. Item-specific functional recovery in children and youth with acquired brain injury. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2003;15:16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Taylor HG, Drotar D, Stancin T, Yeates KO. Childhood traumatic brain injury: Initial impact on the family. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996;29:652–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess E, Drotar D, Taylor G, Wade S, Stancin T, Yeates KO. The family burden of injury interview: Reliability and validity studies. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999;14:394–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research 1995;4:293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Brain Injury Association. C.I.S.L.—Caregiver infor- mation support link. Available online at: www.obia.on.ca/ cisl.html, 2002 accessed 15 May, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. PharmacoEconomics 1995;7:490–502.
   Google Scholar
• Saigal S, Feeny D, Furlong W, Rosenbaum P, Burrows E, Torrance G. Comparison of the health-related quality of life of extremely low birth weight children and a reference group of children at age eight years. Journal of Pediatrics 1994;125:418–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson CMT, Joffe AR, Moore AJ, Watt JM. Neurodevelopmental outcome of young pediatric intensive care survivors of serious brain injury. Pediatric Critical Care and Medicine 2002;3:345–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N, Duffy LC, Zivani J, Granger CV, Braun S, Feidler RC. The WeeFIM instrument: Its utility in detecting change in children with developmental disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;81:1317–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1984.
   Google Scholar