How multi/interdisciplinarity is actualised in work organisation with professional employees specialised in single disciplines: two case studies of the high-technology industry

References

• Alvargonzález, D. 2011. “Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4): 387–403. doi:10.1080/02698595.2011.623366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. 2012. “The Differential Impact of ICT on Employees: Narratives from a Hi-Tech Organisation.” New Technology, Work and Employment 27 (2): 120–133. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00283.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49. Accessed 15 November 2016. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03085140701760841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., and N. Thrift. 2007. “Gabriel Tarde: Imitation, Invention and Economy.” Economy and Society 36 (4): 509–525. doi:10.1080/03085140701589497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayo, A., A. Bello-Pintado, and J. Merino-Díaz-de-Cerio. 2010. “The Effects of Integrated Manufacturing on Job Characteristics.” New Technology, Work and Employment 25 (1): 63–79. doi:10.1111/ntwe.2010.25.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, C.-S., S. Bröring, and J. Leker. 2010. “Anticipating Converging Industries Using Publicly Available Data.” Technology Forecasting and Social Change 77 (3): 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dictionary of Occupational Titles. 2016. “ITA.” Accessed 3 June 2016. http://www.occupationalinfo.org/
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2006. “Trust and Professionalism. Challenges and Occupational Changes.” Current Sociology 54: 515–531. doi: 10.1177/0011392106065083. Accessed 3 June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Finnish technology industry. 2013. Henkilöstöselvitys (Report on personnel, 2013). Eugramen.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Finnish technology industry. 2014. Henkilöstöselvitys 2016 (Report on personnel 2016). Accessed 15 January 2016 http://teknologiateollisuus.fi/sites/default/files/fileattachments/elinkeinopolitiikka_osaaminen_osaamistarpeet_henkilostoselvitys_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gleadle, P., D. Hodgson, and J. Storey. 2012. “The Ground beneath My Feet: Projects, Project Management and the Intensified Control of R& D Engineers.” New Technology, Work and Employment 27 (3): 163–177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00286. Accessed 15 March 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grint, K. 1998. The Sociology of Work. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K., and S. Woolgar. 2013. The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haapakorpi, A., and J. Onnismaa 2014. Ammattien laaja-alaistuminen ja sen työpoliittinen merkitys (Hybridization of Occupations and Labour Policy). Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja. Työ ja yrittäjyys 41/2014. Helsinki: Edita Prime Oy. https://www.tem.fi/files/41191/TEMjul_41_2014_web_17102014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. 2010. “The Danish Fabricated Metal Industry: A Competitive Medium-Low-Tech Industry in A High Wage Country.” Danish Journal of Geography 110 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1080/00167223.2010.10669497. Accessed 7 November 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayler, M. 2015. Challenging the Phenomena of Technology Embodiment, Expertise, and Evolved Knowledge. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgrewe, U. 2007. “Restructuring Gendered Flexibility in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Call Centres in Germany.” In Gendering the Knowledge Economy, edited by S. Walby, H. Gottfried, K. Gottschall, and M. Osawa., 248–270. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K., J. Thompson-Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators.” Research Policy 39 (1): 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalm, M., and T. Seppälä. 2012. “Will Production Relocate from Asia to Finland? Case Bicycle.” The Research Institute of the Finnish Econom: Discussion Papers, no 1287/2012. Accessed 15 February 2015 http://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/dp1287.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures- How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lengwiler, M. 2006. “Between Charisma and Heuristics: Four Styles of Interdisciplinarity.” Science and Public Policy 33 (6): 423–434. doi:10.3152/147154306781778821.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz, A., 2007. “The Collaborative Work Concept and the Information Systems Support: Perspectives for and from Manufacturing Industry.” IET. MPRA Munich Personal PePEc Archive. Accessed 2 September 2015 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37496/
   Google Scholar
• Novotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138. Accessed 3 November 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcheva, V. 2009. “Integrating Diverse Knowledge through Boundary Spanning Processes – The Case of Multidisciplinary Project Teams.” International Journal of Project Management 27 (3): 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.008. Accessed 3 November 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, B. M., M. G. Fernández, and M. Thursby. 2006. “Implications of a Multi-Disciplinary Educational and Research Environment: Perspective of Future Business, Law, Science, and Engineering Professionals in the Technological Innovation. Generating Economic Results Program.” Technological Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (1): 57–69. doi:10.1080/09537320500520577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G., and J. Bunderson. 2005. “Learning and Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams: The Importance of Collective Team Identification.” Academy of Management Journal 4 (3): 532–547. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587. Accessed 11 November 2016.
   Google Scholar