Negotiating presentism: toward a renewed understanding of historical change

References

• Assmann, A. 2013. Ist die Zeit aus den Fugen? Aufstieg und Fall des Zeitregimes der Moderne. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bevernage, B. 2011. History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence: Time and Justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bouton, C. 2019. “Hartog’s Account of Historical Times and the Rise of Presentism.” History 104 (360): 309–330. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. “The Climate of History. Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry. 35 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1086/596640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2018. “Anthropocene Time.” History and Theory 57 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1111/hith.12044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fareld, V. 2016. “(In) between the Living and the Dead: New Perspectives on Time in History,” History Compass 14 (9): 430–440. doi:10.1111/hic3.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, P. 2004. Stranded in the Present. Modern Time and the Melancholy of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, R., and E. Kleinberg, eds. 2013. Presence: Philosophy, History, and Cultural Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, H. U. 2001. “Die Gegenwart wird (immer) breiter.” Merkur 55 (629/630): 769–784.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, H. U. 2004. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, H. U. 2013. After 1945. Latency as Origin of the Present. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, H. U. 2014. Our Broad Present. Time and Contemporary Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog, F. 2005. “Time and Heritage.” Museum International. 57 (3): 7–18. 10.1111/j.1468-0033.2005.00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartog, F. 2015. Regimes of Historicity. Presentism and Experiences of Time. Translated by Saskia Brown. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellerma, J. 2020, “History on the Move: Reimagining Historical Change and the (Im)possibility of Utopia in the 21st Century.” Journal of the Philosophy of History. Advance online publication. doi:10.1163/18722636-12341442.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, L. 1999. Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jordheim, H. 2014. “Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization.” History and Theory 53 (4): 498–518. doi:10.1111/hith.10728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordheim, H. 2019. “Return to Chronology.” In Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism, edited by M. Tamm and L. Olivier, 43–56. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, E. 2017. Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 1975. “Geschichte, Historie.” In R. Koselleck, O. Brunner, and W. Conze, eds. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Band 2. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2000. “Moderne Sozialgeschichte und historische Zeiten.” In R. Koselleck ed, Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik, 317–335. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2002. “The Eighteenth Century as the Beginning of Modernity.” In R. Koselleck ed, The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, 154–169. Translated by Todd Samuel Presner and others. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2004. “Neuzeit: Remarks on the Semantics of Modern Concepts of Movement.” In R. Koselleck ed, Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time, 222–254. Translated by K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2011. “Introduction and Prefaces to the “Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”. Translation and foreword by Michaela Richter. Contributions to the History of Concepts, Vol. 6 (1): 1–5, 7–25, 27–37. doi:10.3167/choc.2011.060102.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2018. “Constancy and Change of All Contemporary Histories: Conceptual-Historical Notes.” In R. Koselleck ed, Sediments of Time. On Possible Histories, 100–116. Translated and edited by Sean Franzel and Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, A. 2014. Geburt der Gegenwart. Eine Geschichte der Zeit im 17. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. 2019. “Out of Time? Some Critical Reflections on François Hartog’s Presentism.” In Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism, eds M. Tamm and L. Olivier, 23–42. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C., and B. Bevernage, eds. 2013. Breaking up Time. Negotiating the Borders between Present, past and Future. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 2015. The past is a Foreign Country – Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2013. Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runia, E. 2014. Moved by the Past: Discontinuity and Historical Mutation, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Z. B. 2018. “(The Impossibility Of) Acting upon a Story that We Can Believe.” Rethinking History, 22 (1), 105–125. doi:10.1080/13642529.2017.1419445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Z. B. 2019. History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Z. B. 2020, The Epochal Event: Transformations in the Entangled Human, Technological, and Natural Worlds. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, M., and L. Olivier eds. 2019. Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar