Source criticism for cultural history

REFERENCE

• Charles VI, Emperor. 1728. Instruction for Philipp Count Kinsky, Laxenburg, 12.06.1728. Österreichisches Staatsarchiv Vienna (OeStA), Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (HHStA), Staatenabteilung England 66, fol. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Charles VI, Emperor. 1729. Letter to Philipp Count Kinsky, Instruction, Vienna, 24.10.1729. OeStA, HHStA, Staatenabteilung England 66, fol. 49.
   Google Scholar
• George I, King of Great Britain and Ireland. 1727. Instructions for John Waldegrave, Baron Waldegrave, ‘private and additional’, London (St. James), 6.6.1727. The National Archives [TNA], State Papers [SP] 80, 62, fol. 45–45v.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Roberta, and Charlotte Backerra, eds. 2020. Confessional Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1730. Vienna, 21.06.1730. Wiener Zeitung 49:6.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1736. The Monthly Chronologer, London, 29 February 1736. The London Magazine 98.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, Leopold. 2015. “Die Verwendung von Chiffren in der diplomatischen Korrespondenz des Kaiserhofes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert” [The Use of Ciphers in the Diplomatic Correspondence of the Imperial Court in the 17th and 18th Century]. In Geheime Post: Kryptographie und Steganographie der diplomatischen Korrespondenz europäischer Höfe während der Frühen Neuzeit [Secret Mail: Cryptography and Steganography in Diplomatic Correspondence of European Courts during the Early Modern Period], In edited by Anne-Simone Rous and Martin Mulsow, 153–169. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann-Medick, Doris. 2016. Cultural Turns: New Orientations in the Study of Culture. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Backerra, Charlotte. 2018. Wien und London, 1727–1735: Internationale Beziehungen im frühen 18. Jahrhundert [Vienna and London, 1727–1735: International Relations in the Early 18th Century]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Backerra, Charlotte, and Peter Edwards. 2021. “Introduction: Rank and Ritual in the Early Modern Court”. The Court Historian 26 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2021.1887598.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, Corina. 2013. Verhandeln in Briefen: Frauen in der höfischen Diplomatie des frühen 18. Jahrhunderts [Negotiating in Letters: Women in Early 18th Century Court Diplomacy]. Cologne: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, Ernst. 1889. Lehrbuch der historischen Methode: Mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hülfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte [Textbook of the Historical Method: With Examples of the Most Important Sources and Aids for the Study of History]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, Ernst. 1894. Lehrbuch der historischen Methode: Mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hülfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte [Textbook of the Historical Method: With Examples of the Most Important Sources and Aids for the Study of History]. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, Ernst. 1903. Lehrbuch der historischen Methode und der Geschichtsphilosophie: Mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hilfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte [Textbook of Historical Method and Philosophy of History: With Examples of the Most Important Sources and Aids for the Study of History]. 3rd and 4th rev. and enl. ed. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, Ernst. 1908. Lehrbuch der historischen Methode und der Geschichtsphilosophie: Mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hilfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte [Textbook of Historical Method and Philosophy of History: With Examples of the Most Important Sources and Aids for the Study of History]. 5th and 6th rev. and enl.ed. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton, William Biggs. 1901. The Amusements of Old London; Being a Survey of the Sports and Pastimes, Tea Gardens and Parks, Playhouses and Other Diversions of the People of London from the 17th to the Beginning of the 19th Century. Vol. 1. London: J. C. Nimmo.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, Andrew, ed. 2018. Schleiermacher: Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Ahasver von. 1958. Werkzeug des Historikers: Eine Einführung in die historischen Hilfswissenschaften [Tools of the Historian: An Introduction to the Historical Ancillary Sciences]. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Braubach, Max. 1969. “Eine Satire auf den Wiener Hof aus den letzten Jahren Kaiser Karls VI.” [A Satire on the Viennese Court from the Last Years of Emperor Charles VI]. In Diplomatie und geistiges Leben im 17 und 18. Jahrhundert: Gesammelte Abhandlungen [Diplomacy and Intellectual Life in the 17th and 18th Century: Collected Treatises], edited by Max Braubach, 385–436. Bonn: Röhrscheid.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Guido. 2018. Diplomatische Wissenskulturen der Frühen Neuzeit: Erfahrungsräume und Orte der Wissensproduktion [Diplomatic Cultures of Knowledge in the Early Modern Period: Spaces of Experience and Places of Knowledge Production]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bünz, Enno. 2019. “Die Monumenta Germaniae Historica 1819–2019: Ein historischer Abriss” [The Monumenta Germaniae Historica 1819–2019: A Historical Outline]. In Mittelalter Lesbar Machen: Festschrift 200 Jahre Monumenta Germaniae Historica [Making the Middle Ages Readable: Celebrating 200 Years of Monumenta Germaniae Historica], edited by Martina Hartmann; Annette Marquard-Mois, and Arno Mentzel-Reuter, and Zimmerhackl, 15–36. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Accessed May 16, 2024. https://www.mgh.de/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/MGH_1819-2019_Buenz-digitaler_Sonderdruck.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, Michael. 2022. Reading History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Peter. 2008. What Is Cultural History? 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Peter 2012. “Strengths and Weaknesses of Cultural History.” Cultural History 1 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3366/cult.2012.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Croker, John Wilson, 1824. Ed. Letters to and from Henrietta, Countess of Suffolk, and Her Second Husband, the Hon. George Berkeley: From 1712 to 1767: With Historical, Biographical, and Explanatory Notes. Vol. 1. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Czeike, Felix. 2004. ‘’Freihaus’ [Free House].’ In Historisches Lexikon Wien [Historical Encyclopaedia Vienna], edited by Felix Czeike, 390–391. Vienna: Kreymayr & Scheriau/Orac.
   Google Scholar
• Dambrogio, Jana. 2014. “Historic Letterlocking: The Art and Security of Letter Writing.” Book Arts – arts du livre Canada, 5 (2): 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dambrogio, Jana, and the Unlocking History Research Group. dir. 2016. “Intelligencer Simeon Foxe’s Dagger-Trap Pleated Letter Sent from Venice (1601).” Letterlocking Instructional Videos: Unlocking History Number 0072. October. Duration: 12:11. Accessed May 16, 2024. https://youtu.be/16GAIaYN_Gk.
   Google Scholar
• Dambrogio, Jana, Amanda Ghassaei, Daniel Starza Smith, Holly Jackson, Martin L. Demaine, Graham Davis, David Mills, et al. 2021. “Unlocking History Through Automated Virtual Unfolding of Sealed Documents Imaged by X-Ray Microtomography”. Nature Communications 12 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21326-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfner, Thomas, Thomas Kirchner, and Christine Roll. 2021. Berichten als kommunikative Herausforderung: Europäische Gesandtenberichte der Frühen Neuzeit in praxeologischer Perspektive [Reporting as a Communicative Challenge: Early Modern Reports of European Envoys from a Praxeological Perspective]. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1868. Grundriss der Historik [Outline of History As Science]. Leipzig: Veit.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1875. Grundriss der Historik [Outline of History as Science]. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Veit.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1882a. Grundriss der Historik [Outline of History As Science]. 3rd rev.ed. Leipzig: Veit.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1882b. Précis de la science de l’histoire [Summery of Historiography]. Translated by P.–A. Dormoy. 2nd ed. Paris: Leroux.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1892. Précis de la science de l’histoire [Summary of Historiography]. Translated by P.–A. Dormoy. 2nd ed. Paris: Leroux.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1893. Outline of the Principles of History. Translated by E. B. Andrews.Boston: Ginn & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1897. Outline of the Principles of History. Translated by Elisha Benjamin Andrews. Boston: Ginn & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1925. Grundriss der Historik [Outline of History As Science]. 4th rev.ed. Halle: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1966. Istorica: Lezioni sulla enciclopedia e metodologia della storia [Historic: Lessons on Encyclopaedia and Methodology of History]. Translated by Luigi Emery. Milan: Ricciardi.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1967. Sommario di istorica [Summary of Historic]. Translated by Delio Cantimori. Firenze: Sansoni.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 1983. Histórica: lecciones sobre la enciclopedia y metodología de la historia [Historic: Lessons on Encyclopaedia and Methodology of History]. Translated by Ernesto Garzón Valdés and Rafael Gutiérrez Girardot. Barcelona: Ed. Alfa.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, Johann Gustav, 2002. Précis de théorie de l’histoire [Summary of the Theory of History]. Translated by Alexandre Escudier. Paris: Cerf.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrmann, Kristine. 2021. “Political Sociability at the Brahetrolleborg Estate in Denmark, 1789–90”. Scandinavian Journal of History 46 (4): 510–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2021.1891132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelberg, Peter, and Dorthe Gert. Simonsen. 2015. “Changing the Subject: Epistemologies of Scandinavian Source Criticism.” Scandinavian Journal of History 40 (2): 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2015.1021276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erslev, Kristian. 1911. Historisk Teknik: den historiske Undersøgelse fremstillet i sine Grundlinier [Historical Technique: The Historical Investigation Presented in its Basics]. Copenhagen: Erslev.
   Google Scholar
• Furger, Carmen. 2010. Briefsteller: Das Medium “Brief” im 17. und frühen 18. Jahrhundert [Letter Writer: The Medium “Letter” in the 17th and Early 18th Century]. Vienna: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Füssel, Marian. 2021. ‘‘Kommentar’ [Commentary].’ In Berichten als kommunikative Herausforderung: Europäische Gesandtenberichte der Frühen Neuzeit in praxeologischer Perspektive [Reporting as a Communicative Challenge: Early Modern Reports of European Envoys from a Praxeological Perspective], edited by Thomas Dorfner, et al., 160–165. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Georgi, Sonja, Julia Ilgner, Isabell Lammel, Cathleen Sarti, and Christine Waldschmidt, eds. 2015. Geschichtstransformationen: Medien, Verfahren und Funktionalisierungen historischer Rezeption [Transformations of History: Media, Methods, and Functionalisations of Historical Reception]. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Graham C. 1962. “Parliament and Foreign Policy in the Age of Stanhope and Walpole”. The English Historical Review 77 (302): 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/LXXVII.CCCII.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginzburg, Carlo. 1976. Il formaggio e i vermi: Il cosmo di un mugnaio del’ 500 [The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller]. Turin: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Shawn, Ian Milligan, and Scott Weingart. 2016. Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian’s Macroscope. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulston, Joseph 1786 A Biographical Dictionary of Foreigners who have resided in or visited England, from the earliest times down to the year 1777, vol. 3 (s.l.) BL [British Library], Add. Mss. 34282, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Horton. 1975. The Tübingen School. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennings, Jan, and Tracey A. Sowerby. 2017. “Introduction”. In Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410–1800, In edited by Tracey A. Sowerby and Jan Hennings, 1–21. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heuß, Alfred. 1981. ‘‘Näheres zu Niebuhr’ [More on Niebuhr].’ Antike und Abendland 27 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241396.1.
   Google Scholar
• Huysman, Ineke. 2017. ‘’100 pagina’s transcriptie brieven Johan de Witt voor Transkribus’ [100 Pages Transcripted Letters of Johann de Witt for Transkribus].’ Dataset. 16 Dec 2017. Transkribus.
   Google Scholar
• Huysman, Ineke. “Silent Power: Privacy Practices of the Dutch and Frisian Stadholder’s Wives (1605–1725).” Presented at the Privacy at Court: A Reassessment of the Public/Private Divide within European Courts (1400–1800), Copenhagen/online, 11 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hylkema, Jacqueline. 2015. ‘Between Fact and Fiction: Transforming the Past in George Psalmanazar’s Forged Histories of the Orient.’ In Geschichtstransformationen: Medien, Verfahren und Funktionalisierungen historischer Rezeption [Transformations of History: Media, Methods, and Functionalisations of Historical Reception], edited by Sonja Georgi, et al., 259–280. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jordheim, Helge, and David Gary Shaw. 2020. “Opening Doors: A Turn to Knowledge.” History and Theory 59 (4): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampmann, Christoph. 2013. ‘’Friedensschluss und dynastisches Prinzip: Kontinuität und Wandel im Zeitalter des Utrechter Friedens’ [Peace Agreement and Dynastic Principle: Continuity and Change in the Age of the Peace of Utrecht].’ In Utrecht – Rastatt – Baden 1712–1714: Ein europäisches Friedenswerk am Ende des Zeitalters Ludwigs XIV. [Utrecht – Rastatt – Baden 1712–1714: A European Work of Peace at the End of the Age of Louis XIV.], edited by Heinz Duchhardt and Martin Espenhorst, 35–51. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Kleisner, Tomáš. 1999. “Barokní londýnský token hraběte Kinského” [Count Kinsky’s Baroque Token from London]. Numismatické listy [Numismatic Sheets] 54:33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Krischer, André. 2009. ‘’Souveränität als sozialer Status: Zur Funktion des diplomatischen Zeremoniells in der Frühen Neuzeit’ [Sovereignty as Social Status: On the Function of Diplomatic Ceremonial in the Early Modern Period].’ In Diplomatisches Zeremoniell in Europa und im mittleren Osten in der Frühen Neuzeit [Diplomatic Ceremonial in Europe and the Middle East in the Early Modern Period], Inedited by Ralph Kauz; Giorgio Rota, and Jan Paul Niederkorn, 1–32. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, Achim. 2013. ‘’Historisches Material’ [Historical Material].’ In Über die Praxis des kulturwissenschaftlichen Arbeitens: Ein Handwörterbuch [On the Practice of Cultural Studies: A Dictionary], edited by Ute Frietsch and Jörg Rogge, 184–188. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, Charles-Victor, and Charles Seignobos. 1898. Introduction aux études historiques [Introduction to Historical Studies]. Paris: Librairie Hachette et Cie.
   Google Scholar
• Laura, Sangha, and Jonathan P. Willis, eds. 2016. Understanding Early Modern Primary Sources. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, Isabella. 2015. Communication and Conflict: Italian Diplomacy in the Early Renaissance, 1350–1520. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebrecht, Johannes. 2016. Fritz Kern und das gute alte Recht: Geistesgeschichte als neuer Zugang für die Mediävistik [Fritz Kern and the Good Old Law: Intellectual History as a New Approach for Medieval Studies]. Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, [John?]. 1731/35. Letters to Sir Thomas Robinson, envoy in Vienna, London, 4.8.1731/15.11.1731/22.11.1731/25.2.1735. West Yorkshire Archival Services, Leeds, WYL 150, 6023, sine fol.
   Google Scholar
• Möhler, Rainer. n.d. “Info-Blatt Quellenarbeit.” [Information Sheet on Working with Sources] S.L. S.T. Accessed May 16, 2024. https://www.uni-saarland.de/fileadmin/upload/fakultaet-p/moehler/materialien/info/Info-Quellen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mössland, Markus, and Torsten Riotte, eds. 2008. The Diplomats’ World: A Cultural History of Diplomacy, 1815–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Philipp. 2020. ‘Understanding History: Hermeneutics and Source Criticism in Historical Scholarship.’ In Reading Primary Sources: The Interpretation of Texts from Nineteenth and Twentieth Century History, edited by Miriam Dobson and Benjamin Ziemann, 21–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogrin, Mircea. 2012. Ernst Bernheim (1850–1942): Historiker und Wissenschaftspolitiker im Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik [Ernst Bernheim (1850–1942): Historian and Politician of Science in the German Empire and Weimar Republic]. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Ondoua, Hervé. 2016. “Jacques Derrida et la question de l’histoire”, Rue Descartes 2 (89–90): 231–244. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdes.089.0231
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Toby. 2002. Dynasty and Diplomacy in the Court of Savoy: Political Culture and the Thirty Years’ War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, Thomas G. 1997. “Introduction: Personalities and Impersonal Forces in History”. In Personalities, War and Diplomacy: Essays in International History, Inedited by Thomas G. Otte and Constantine A. Pagedas, 1–13. London: Frank Class.
   Google Scholar
• Pandel, Hans-Jürgen. 2006. Quelleninterpretation: die schriftliche Quelle im Geschichtsunterricht [Source Interpretation: The Written Source in History Teaching]. Schwalbach/Taunus: Wochenschau-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Herman. 2019. “A Missing Link in the History of Historiography: Scholarly Personae in the World of Alfred Dove.” History of European Ideas 45 (7): 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2019.1628084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranke, Leopold von. 1874. Zur Kritik neuerer Geschichtsschreiber [On the Critique of Recent Historians]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, Maria, and Ernst Wawra, eds. 2019. Quellenanalyse: Ein epochenübergreifendes Handbuch für das Geschichtsstudium [Source Analysis: A Epoch-Spanning Handbook for the Study of History]. Stuttgart: UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, Maria, and Ernst Wawra. 2020. ‘‘Tradition’, ‘Überrest’, ‘Denkmäler’ und/oder ‘alles’ [‘Tradition’, ‘Remnant’, ’Monuments’ and/or ‘All’].’ In Quellenanalyse: Ein epochenübergreifendes Handbuch für das Geschichtsstudium [Source Analysis: A Epoch-Spanning Handbook for the Study of History], edited by Maria Rhode and Ernst Wawra, 20–30. Stuttgart: UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, Jörn. 2013. Historik: Theorie der Geschichtswissenschaft [Historiography: Theory of the Science of History]. Vienna: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, Jörn. 2020. Geschichte denken: Erläuterungen zur Historik [Thinking History: Explanations on Historicism]. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schama, Simon. 1991. Dead Certainties: Unwarranted Speculations. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, Heinz. 2007. Konfessionalisierung und Staatsinteressen: internationale Beziehungen 1559–1660 [Confessionalisation and State Interests: International Relations 1559–1660]. Paderborn: Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, Gisela. 1957. “Englands Österreichpolitik in den Jahren 1730–1735 nach den Berichten des englischen Gesandten am Wiener Hof, Sir Thomas Robinson [England’s Austrian Policy in the Years 1730–1735 According to the Reports of the English Envoy to the Court of Vienna, Sir Thomas Robinson].” PhD diss., University of Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. 1997. “Zeremoniell als politisches Verfahren: Rangordnung und Rangstreit als Strukturmerkmale des frühneuzeitlichen Reichstags” [Ceremony as Political Procedure: Ranking and Ranking Disputes as Structural Features of the Early Modern Imperial Diet]. In Neue Studien zur frühneuzeitlichen Reichsgeschichte [New Studies in Early Modern Imperial History], edited by Johannes Kunisch, 91–132. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeyer, Arno. 2007. ‘’Wahrnehmungen des Fremden: Differenzerfahrungen von Diplomaten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert: Forschungsstand – Erträge – Perspektiven’ [Perceptions of the Foreign: Diplomats’ Experiences of Difference in the 16th and 17th Centuries: State of Research – Results – Perspectives].’ In Wahrnehmungen des Fremden: Differenzerfahrungen von Diplomaten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert [Perceptions of the Foreign: Diplomats’ Experiences of Difference in the 16^th and 17^th Centuries], Inedited by Michael Rohrschneider and Arno Strohmeyer, 1–50. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tantner, Anton. 2011. Adressbüros im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit [Address Offices in Early Modern Europe]. Manuscript, habilitation, University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, Hillard von. 2010a. Diplomatie und Patronage: Die spanisch-römischen Beziehungen 1605–1621 in akteurszentrierter Perspektive [Diplomacy and Patronage: Spanish-Roman Relations 1605–1621 from an Actor-Centred Perspective]. Epfendorf/Neckar: bibliotheca academica.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, Hillard von. 2010b. “‘Diplomatie vom type ancien: Überlegungen zu einem Idealtypus des frühneuzeitlichen Gesandtschaftswesens’ [Diplomacy of the type ancien: Reflections on the Ideal of Early Modern Diplomacy].” In Akteure der Außenbeziehungen: Netzwerke und Interkulturalität im historischen Wandel [Actors in Foreign Relations: Networks and Interculturality in Historical Change], edited by Hillard von Thiessen and Christian Windler, 471–503. Cologne: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Waldegrave, John. 1728. Letter to George Tilson, undersecretary of state, Vienna, 27.11.1728. The National Archives, Kew, State Papers 80/63, fol. 237.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden A. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden A. 1980. “Review: Historik. By Johann Gustav Droysen”. History and Theory 19 (1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504814
   Google Scholar