From victimhood to sisterhood – A practice-based reflexive inquiry into narrative informed group work with women who have experienced sexual abuse

References

• Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.10.1111/famp.1987.26.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn or blind alley? Qualitative Health Research, 7, 325–344.10.1177/104973239700700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, E., & Davis, L. (1988). The courage to heal: A guide for women survivors of child sexual abuse. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405–413.10.1111/famp.1987.26.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesler, P. (2005). Women and madness. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, P. (1999). The ethnographic self. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. (1999). Adults abused as children. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. M., & Frawley, M. G. (1994). Treating the adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse: A psychoanalytic perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Denborough, D. (2008). Collective narrative practice: Responding to individuals, groups and communities who have experienced trauma. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Denborough, D. (2014). Retelling the stories of our lives: Everyday narrative therapy to draw inspiration and transform experience. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2003). Trauma, the body and transformation: A narrative inquiry. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 267–294.10.1177/089124193022003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and civilization. (R. Howard, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. (1999). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haaken, J., & Schlaps, A. (1991). Incest resolution therapy and the objectification of sexual abuse. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 28, 39–47.10.1037/0033-3204.28.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. (1988). Reality. The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 25–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9, 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, S. (2009). Postmodern psychotherapeutic ethics: Relational responsibility in practice. Human Systems: The Journal of Therapy, Consultation and Training., 20, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, M. (2013). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguisic Journal, 15(2), 279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Nencel, L. (2013). Situating reflexivity: Voices, positionalities and representations in feminist ethnographic texts. Women’s Studies International Forum, 43, 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, P. (1990). Rescuing the inner child: Therapy for adults sexually abused as children. London: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, B. (2007). Making social worlds: A communication perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, V. (2010). Doing justice as a path to sustainability in community work. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://www.taosinstitute.net/Websites/taos/Images/PhDProgramsCompletedDissertations/ReynoldsPhDDissertationFeb2210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, V. (2014). A solidarity approach: The rhizome and messy inquiry. In G. Simon & A. Chard (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research. Farnhill: Everything is connected press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2005). Transparency and self-disclosure1 in family therapy: Dangers and possibilities. Family Process, 44, 45–63.10.1111/famp.2005.44.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (1999, June 3–5). Writing from within “living moments”: “Withness-writing” rather than “aboutness-writing”. Fourth National Writing Across the Curriculum Conference: Multiple Intelligences. Cornell: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (2005). Goethe and the refiguring of intellectual inquiry: From ‘aboutness’-thinking to ‘withness’ thinking in everyday life. Janus Head, 8, 132–158.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (2011, March 5–9). Language, joint action, and the ethical domain: The importance of the relations between our living bodies and their surroundings. Plenary paper to be given at III Congreso De Psicología Y Responsabilidad Social [Congress of Psychology and Soical Responsibility]. Colombia: Campus San Alberto Magno.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. (2012). Praction research: A model of systemic inquiry. Human Systems Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 23, 103–124.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. (2013). Relational ethnography: Writing and reading in research relationships. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. (2014). Systemic inquiry as qualitative inquiry. In G. Simon & A. Chard (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research (pp. 3–29). Farnhill: Everything is Connected Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, T. (1984). The therapeutic state: Psychiatry in the mirror of current events. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (2004). Finding the limits: Autoethnography and being an Oxford University Proctor. Qualitative Research, 4, 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (1995). Re-authoring lives: Interviews and essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. London: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (2011). Narrative practice: Continuing the conversations. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar